Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You realise how insanely expensive that would be, right?

Apple's stuffs are already insanely expensive anyway. People here at Mac Rumors just won't care about the price. They buy Apple's product anyway, even if Apple charge them at ridiculously expensive price.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

Glad that for once I developed some patience. A certain sale here when sandy bridge arrives on the air.
 
I think the "source" for this story got confused. June is about the time that the MacBook would get an update. Not the MBA. The MacBook got refreshed May 18th last year. The mobile Sandy Bridge is arriving a bit latter than the mobile Arrandales did last year. That's not to mention the support chip screw up that Intel had. So it wouldn't be surprising to see that "anniversary" date slide a month into June. By June Apple would have steadied out their supply of parts for the updated MBPs and be ready to add the MB's to the picture. The MBA would wait till it was closer to when Lion was going to ship (at some point in the Fall doesn't make sense to ship when new OS is coming.)

All of that sounds quite sensible actually.
 
You realise how insanely expensive that would be, right?

I'll give the OP the benefit of doubt and assume he was being sarcastic. That's the ONLY way one can make sense of his statement. :p

cheers
JohnG
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

Will this have any effect on battery life? From what people are saying doesn't seem like much of a bump performance wise compared to the current nvidia combo. Probably will wait till 4 gb ram is standard and Lion comes out.
 
This is very credible source indeed. It's a same company who said MBP will get i3 processor and iPad 7 inch...in 2010.

MBP and iPad are more due for updates.

After that, it's iMac's turn. Not MBA.
 
If you're even THINKING of getting one, just do it; it's an incredible machine. The whole constant need for a faster processor mentality is asinine.
???????

If people want to wait 4 months and get more for their money, it's asinine for someone to try and talk them out of it. It's 4 months. The whole "if you're always waiting for the technology just over the hill, you'll never buy anything" argument just doesn't work for a 4-month wait.

I guess Misery loves company.

---------------------

Besides, C|NET has been wrong about facts LOTS of times. And what's it with C|Net's dude/girl?
 
I just now understood the air's quote "The future of Macbooks".
No more plastic macbook, no more macbook pro, ONLY THE AIR WILL SURVIVE!
all jokes aside, im worried that apple may drop their white+mbp 13" and keep air 11-13 and pro 15-17.
 
Maybe they'll put the backlit keyboards back in for this new release. Never understood the logic of taking them out when they'd been there before.

I think they are thicker than the non-backlit keyboards and won't fit in a MacBook Air.
 
Does anyone have an idea of what sort of impact this will have on battery life?

Battery life would get better. One of the reasons that Intel's graphics has lagged in performance is that lower power was higher on the design priority list than many of the features that Nvidia/ATI-AMD added to their solutions. So Intel's solution was more competitive on perf/watt than on performance alone. When matched up on chip implementation tech generation versus the others they are as "hopelessly bad" as many folks around here characterize them. ( $/perf was also has been higher on the design priority list than Nvidia/ATI . )

The performance would be a backwards slide on higher end 3D graphics though. Back to the previous MBA (mid-2009 or worse ) era of graphics. That's way waiting till a better "two chip" solution appear later in the year would be a smarter design choice for the MBA. Churning the design "just because" is very misguided. Nor would it be too surprising to see Apple milk the current C2D/Nvidia solution for another 6+ months from its launch date until May-June 2012 if nothing this Summer/Fall is has better $/perf and perf/watt ratios.
 
I'm a graphic designer and use my maxed 11" Air as my main machine. It runs CS5 Design beautifully. InDesign, Photoshop, Illustrator, Outlook, Word and multiple web pages opened all at once and never a hiccup.
wow -- you use an ELEVEN-INCH computer as your main machine for GRAPHIC DESIGN?! Wow! I'm not saying it can't crunch the data, but I do design too, but my Mac Pro has a 27-inch monitor attached to it. And I selfishly still want a second 27-inch.

Do you tether your notebook to something bigger? Just curious! :)
 
I think they are thicker than the non-backlit keyboards and won't fit in a MacBook Air.

Apple fanboys will say, "Uncle Steve and his team will find a way and make us open our wallets."
 
I just now understood the air's quote "The future of Macbooks".
No more plastic macbook, no more macbook pro, ONLY THE AIR WILL SURVIVE!
all jokes aside, im worried that apple may drop their white+mbp 13" and keep air 11-13 and pro 15-17.

Right now apple had 3s of sku on 13 in model.

Macbook
Macbook pro
Macbook air

One of them has to go...
 
Any word on what the TDP for these MacBook Air compatible Sandy Bridge processors might be?
The current 11.6" Core 2 Duo TDP is 10Watts and runs noticeably cooler an much quieter than the 17W of the 13" MBA.
I currently have both here side by side and was surprised (and disappointed) to find how much hotter (and noiser) the 13" runs. :(
 
Only when you turn the graphics down to low quality mode. The graphics while better than the last generation of integrated chips is still sorely lacking. This is just Apple giving in to Intel's demand that they forgo putting separate graphics cards in their computers. I would much rather have the Core Duo/Nvidia combo than the SandyBridge chip with poor graphics.

so... you're saying that the next macbook pro 13" will be worse than the current... awright bro, i believe you!
 
its computer time.

I hope AAPL starts spending more time on thinking up cutting edge COMPUTERS. We have the iToys, now it is time push the limits on core computer products.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

Core 2 Duo is 5 years old. Time to step up Apple.
 
I personally would just want a better processor (Core i3 would be nice) for the coming MBA...wait...no... I WANT MY BACKLIT KEYBOARD BACK TOO!!!
 
I think they are thicker than the non-backlit keyboards and won't fit in a MacBook Air.

Cost may have played a role also. The 2009 MBA had backlit keyboards (all the way back to the original MBA). Granted it is thicker than the current 13" MBA but some of the contributor to thickness was the hard drive also. (for the 11" version there is nothing to look back to). It is simpler, costs less, and slightly less power consuming to leave it out. I suspect it was also harder to insert into the 11" version and so leaving it out of the 13" one was more consistent (in addition to the previous listed perks from Apple's perspective). Backlit keyboards is once again a "MacBook Pro" feature.
 
wow -- you use an ELEVEN-INCH computer as your main machine for GRAPHIC DESIGN?! Wow! I'm not saying it can't crunch the data, but I do design too, but my Mac Pro has a 27-inch monitor attached to it. And I selfishly still want a second 27-inch.

Do you tether your notebook to something bigger? Just curious! :)

Yes I tether it to a 23" LG HD monitor. I would love a 27" Apple monitor (or two), but LG is one of my clients and I won't squawk at free technology.

I also have, from time to time, needed to work on just the Air's screen, but I'm a GD Ninja and the 11" real estate causes me little issue. ;)

D.
 
Any word on what the TDP for these MacBook Air compatible Sandy Bridge processors might be?
The current 11.6" Core 2 Duo TDP is 10Watts and runs noticeably cooler an much quieter than the 17W of the 13" MBA.
I currently have both here side by side and was surprised (and disappointed) to find how much hotter (and noiser) the 13" runs. :(
17W includes the IGP. Add another ~4 Watts for the PCH.
 
That totally sucks for those of us who took the initial leap.
Apple has a lot on their plate right now, seems unlikely to come out 6 months after the initial release of the product.

MacRumors is usually is on the cutting edge of hear say and innuendo, so I'm not going to get to upset at this point.
More like 8 months (since 20 October 2010).
 
Sandy Bridge + back lit keyboard + 4GB RAM standard = me knocking people over (small children and the elderly included) at the Apple store to get the new Air
 
so... you're saying that the next macbook pro 13" will be worse than the current... awright bro, i believe you!

The next MBP 13" could easily have discrete graphics just like the other MBP brethren if they drop the DVD drive and replace it with discrete chip and an additional fan (just like the other models). If Apple is going to declare war on DVD/CDs ( flash memory based emergency boot and OS restore device, Mac App Store , etc.) then there should be internal volume in the MBP 13" for a discrete chip, VRAM, and additional cooling.

Additionally, a MBP 13" with a discrete GPU will further differentiate that model from the MBA 13". If need more graphics performance.... buy the MBP 13". Similar to how MBP 13" differentiated from the MB 13".


In the MBA there is not because they chose to minimize volume. So there is no space to "recover" to add multiple new components.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.