Damn, that sucks.
Great bit of deduction that. Nice one.
But why would Apple do this? Surely they'd sell more of them if unrestricted
<<But if you connected a powered-hub to your port and then plugged it into that, wouldn't it be able to draw enough power to run and be used, of course it wouldn't be convenient, but would it work ?>>
No it wouldn't, unfortunately. I read somewhere that the Superdrive needs a direct connection to the Air and couldn't be used through a powered hub. But I had to try it for myself and I can report that it definitely doesn't work. It's a good thing that the drive is only for occasional use or it would be a major problem because of the Air's single USB port.
@Mixalis, actually, my hacked SuperDrive works fine when connected to a powered hub![]()
Well it's called the "MacBook Air SuperDrive," and the description says it's "for the MacBook Air." The system requirements are pretty simple: "MacBook Air computer." Isn't that clear enough?
You can buy a cable which plugs into two usb ports and goes to one mini usb for powering external 2.5" harddrives.
I read somewhere that the Superdrive needs a direct connection to the Air and couldn't be used through a powered hub.
Hack it for use with other computers
http://tnkgrl.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/macbook-air-superdrive-for-all/
Oops I see it's posted it above.
I'm impressed!![]()
^ That should be at least second page news. MBA Superdrive is artificially crippled from usage on other hardware not because of power requirements as apple have stated.... Whilst I'm not shocked it's certainly very interesting.
Very well done on working this out.
* Presumably this is hacked to work with any Mac rather than just the Air? I would have tried a two-plug USB cable if the Superdrive USB cable hadn't been hard-wired into the device. Maybe it will work if I get a USB adaptor with two plugs to get the extra power from the hub.
Why does that suck?Wow that sucks.
Talk about a straw-man argument. Breaking a published software standard != using an existing plug type for a different purpose. Clearly you don't have a solid grasp on the concept of a standardized connector:Microsoft - We've improved HTML, but it doesn't work for any other browser.
Apple - We've improved USB, but it doesn't work for any other machine.
All I've got to say is, if Apple didn't like the spec, they shouldn't have used the plug.
In Apple's case, they are not marketing it as a USB Superdrive. They're specifically marketing it as a "Macbook Air Superdrive". No where in any of their literature does it imply conformance with the USB spec or interoperability with notebooks other than the Macbook Air. Additionally, you can still plug *any* standards compliant USB device into the Macbook Air and it will work - the port is not crippled in any way.I was referring to USB as a whole, not just the connector.
Apple isn't just using the connector, but also the protocol. The only thing that is out of spec is the power requirements.
This is very analogous to 'extending' HTML. In both cases a well defined spec is being altered in a way that extends the functionality for a proprietary solution at the expense of compatibility.
I am a condescending jackass and I don't pretend to be otherwise.BTW - It's condescending comments like yours that lead to the generally negative attitude towards the Apple community.