Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
"Port" covered with tape

Has anyone stopped to think that the "port" covered with tape might be a vent? PowerBooks have had a vent in the same position in the past. Doesn't seem like a stretch to me.
 
That's funny... I'd say that they DEFINITELY care, considering that they happen to sell those tools. Besides, Logic Express (the 'lite' version of Logic) is a $200 piece of 'ware targeted at the consumer market, and it still needs a good audio interface. Apple's going to turn around and prevent all Logic Express users from using a FW audio interface?

Hm... not buying it.

I have to agree, and to the original poster Maklinn, I have to say that
These are professional tools, I'm pretty sure that as far as Apple's concerned you don't use >$1000 worth of tool with a $1000 worth laptop.

Is a bit naive and condescending, especially considering the educational market, most courses in sound or audio are done using macs, either with Logic or Pro Tools. That's a lot of students who need a laptop, and preferably with FW so they can get a quality audio interface to go with it.

Plus the notion that the word "PRO" means that there's no limitation on ones budget is a little daft. ;)
 
I totally agree, with a slight change in design it is possible that we could several other ports on our macbooks insted of losing one!! Seen as apple are so good at the design of these things i would have thought they would have done this alread

I vote for a port that cooks hotdogs. Just have it supply some current with two probes that go in each end (one in each end that is).
 
Tapered case

the case still could end up being tapered like the Air. Not tapered down to such a small edge as in the Air, but tapered down to the edge that we're seeing in these photos. We haven't seen the screen or the bottom of the case, and these are the parts that would show the taper that we saw in this spy shot. So basically, the bottom of the case would bulge out, although I think someone measured and found that even the thickest part was still thinner than the current MBP. The taper still manages to make it LOOK a lot thinner than the MBP, and Apple's been doing perception tricks like that for decades.

I'm betting this photo is legit, those ports probably just barely fit along that edge and were obviously the limiting factor in the degree of that taper.
 

Attachments

  • xc3q8h.jpg
    xc3q8h.jpg
    33 KB · Views: 134
What some of you need to understand is FW is pretty much dead. Or at least a rarity anymore. Especially if they include USB 3.0. But as far as FW, I haven't used in over three years. Nor has anyone that I know, except my brother. And the only reason he has used it is for a first generation iPod. Which is now at the bottom of a junk drawer.

I understand some people still use it, but no one is forcing you to buy a new MB. Like the guy that asked if Apple was going to buy him all new equipment if he buys a new MB. Why would Apple need to do that? It's not their decision as to whether you buy a new MB. Are they threatening you with a lawsuit if you don't?

I have plenty of obsolete technology. Get over it. There are plenty of notebooks that don't include FW anymore. And if you want it, you need to fork over the money to get it.
 
Im still thinking theres GOING to be firewire, i cant believe theres nearly 2000 posts across 2 threads about it... calm down!
We will find out tommorow, and there will be firewire!
Dont moan until you know about it!
If apple doesnt include FW, then moan about it, 1,000,000 posts of it, i dont care :p
 
These are professional tools, I'm pretty sure that as far as Apple's concerned you don't use >$1000 worth of tool with a $1000 worth laptop.

In other words, they don't care about that.

I think you've got it right. Like with graphics, MacBook just isn't good enough for it.

not if the hdd is encrypted

I was referring to the fingerprint reader providing all security (sometimes even replacing passwords). I agree it might have sounded as if it was always easy, sorry for that.
 
Not a huge fan of the potential loss of Firewire here.....

I do like some of the suggestions though of eSATA or HDMI additions though with only a few reservations:
HDMI: There are not many if any LCD computer monitors on the market that are cost effective that have HDMI connections. Hell most of the ones that finally have DVI still have VGA on the back! However, pro photogs will like the addition for viewing their shots on a nice HD screen. They, but I believe it was Dave Cross, had a nice small segment on PhotoshopUser TV a while back about this. However I just don't see this being a widely used viable option as a replacement to a widely used port that has many many periphs already on the market that use FW400.
eSATA: While this is the way I prefer to hook up external HDDs, that is all it is good for at this moment. If eSATA could be implemented into all other periphs from printers to scanners to DVD/Blu-Ray burners then I think it has some real legs to stand on. I know it is stupid to say but what if eSATA could be used in place of Gigabit Ethernet to network a small number of Macs together in a cluster? Would it not have maximum speeds roughly 3-4x faster?

well, personally, the hdmi port would be relatively useful because it would eliminate the monitors in my house. why have another monitor, when you could just have a tv with a larger screen. that allows for a more integrated entertainment system, and a better experience in my opinion. i think that people will go for it.

but with esata, i think that we have ways to go before the majority of perifs. are nuilt in with esata. its been somewhat overlooked in some things like printers. and ethernet is overpowering right now. and from my experinces, the connectors are very fragile.
 
the case still could end up being tapered like the Air. Not tapered down to such a small edge as in the Air, but tapered down to the edge that we're seeing in these photos. We haven't seen the screen or the bottom of the case, and these are the parts that would show the taper that we saw in this spy shot. So basically, the bottom of the case would bulge out, although I think someone measured and found that even the thickest part was still thinner than the current MBP. The taper still manages to make it LOOK a lot thinner than the MBP, and Apple's been doing perception tricks like that for decades.

I'm betting this photo is legit, those ports probably just barely fit along that edge and were obviously the limiting factor in the degree of that taper.

that pic is cool.
look fat though
 
There seems to be a lot of people here who use Firewire, but I am sure there are a lot that don't. I fall into the latter category. I used to use it for a video cam, but since that died I have not used it at all. I have friends the same (none of them musicians mind) who don't use it all. But they don't have mac's though. Well in another 24 I guess we'll find out!!! ;)
 
What we are looking at may be JUST the $799 MacBook (that doesn't have firewire). Visualize it this way

13":
$799 - No firewire
$899 - Same specs + slightly better video/0.1 Ghz processor upgrade + firewire
$999 - ^ Same spec + HDD space + RAM

And so on...
 
There seems to be a lot of people here who use Firewire, but I am sure there are a lot that don't. I fall into the latter category. I used to use it for a video cam, but since that died I have not used it at all. I have friends the same (none of them musicians mind) who don't use it all. But they don't have mac's though. Well in another 24 I guess we'll find out!!! ;)

A lot of the fuss is because most of the people who like and use FW actually believe deep down that Apple are capable of nixing it in a new consumer model.

I know I do.
 
that pic is cool.
look fat though

Like I said, someone measured that pic in a previous thread, and found that it was still thinner than the current MBP even at the fattest part. And I'll bet it would look really thin if seen from typical laptop viewing angle, (as in from above, not directly side-on). That's the way it works with the Air. When Jobs first showed it off, you can see he made a point of showing it at an angle that made it look impossibly thin.

Sort of like how the new Jaguar XK was designed with a taper to the nose and tail, so that if you see it from an angle, it looks like there's no rear or front overhang at all.
 
What we are looking at may be JUST the $799 MacBook (that doesn't have firewire). Visualize it this way

13":
$799 - No firewire
$899 - Same specs + slightly better video/0.1 Ghz processor upgrade + firewire
$999 - ^ Same spec + HDD space + RAM

And so on...
No. An I/O port is a significant modification, and means a completely different case and internal design, they're not going to add that as a $100 option, it makes absolutely no sense.

At best, if they decide they'll have a 15" macbook you might find an FW port on the 15", but if there is no FW on the base 13" macbook you won't find it on any of the 13".
 
What some of you need to understand is FW is pretty much dead. Or at least a rarity anymore. Especially if they include USB 3.0. But as far as FW, I haven't used in over three years. Nor has anyone that I know, except my brother. And the only reason he has used it is for a first generation iPod. Which is now at the bottom of a junk drawer.

I understand some people still use it, but no one is forcing you to buy a new MB. Like the guy that asked if Apple was going to buy him all new equipment if he buys a new MB. Why would Apple need to do that? It's not their decision as to whether you buy a new MB. Are they threatening you with a lawsuit if you don't?

I have plenty of obsolete technology. Get over it. There are plenty of notebooks that don't include FW anymore. And if you want it, you need to fork over the money to get it.

Dead! What planet are you on, just because you don't use it doesn't mean it's obsolete.

I don't use HDMI, therefore it must be dead, Bah!

I'll repeat again, Audio and Video = Firewire.

Apple make some of the best Audio and Video software, for them to get rid of a standard they created on their consumer devices would be a cheapshot to many users who've invested in FW devices.

All though I do think that part of FW not having as much market share was Apples daft decision to differentiate FW400 and FW800 between their consumer and pro lines.
 
What we are looking at may be JUST the $799 MacBook (that doesn't have firewire). Visualize it this way

13":
$799 - No firewire
$899 - Same specs + slightly better video/0.1 Ghz processor upgrade + firewire
$999 - ^ Same spec + HDD space + RAM

And so on...


My bet is that the rumored "$800" laptop will actually end up being $899.
 
why don't you just move all your accessories to the network instead of having them directly connected to to your laptop
 
I'm fairly sure that even the Mac Pro has a single FW bus (for its 4 ports).

The express card solution has two problems. First it does not supply power, so you have to have extra wires and power brick making you less mobile. Secondly the card pops out of the slot way too easily on the current MBP (at least my card does), and if attached to the Duet, that's instant kernel panic.

I'd heard about the express cards having problems, I guess in an ideal world Apple would offer their Pro computers with multiple FW busses, rather that just multiple ports, but I doubt that's going to happen.

But saying that doesn't USB run over 2 busses, at least on my Dual G5 it does?
 
I have plenty of obsolete technology. Get over it. There are plenty of notebooks that don't include FW anymore. And if you want it, you need to fork over the money to get it.

What you need to understand that while FW might be 'obsolete' for general consumer peripherals (and even that's a stretch), it's the de-facto standard for all data-intensive media applications. I'd say that makes it vital technology, especially considering Apple's long courtship with the content-creation market. A bloody ton of media professionals that have pro machines at work have consumer-level machines (macbooks) at home, and these are the same people who make purchasing decisions for studios.

Apple may be frustrating, and not everyone always gets to have what they want in a machine as technology changes, but until a remotely viable replacement for FW in media devices comes out, please don't try to convince me that the people working at Apple are actually retarded enough to deem FW obsolete.
 
Like I said, someone measured that pic in a previous thread, and found that it was still thinner than the current MBP even at the fattest part. And I'll bet it would look really thin if seen from typical laptop viewing angle, (as in from above, not directly side-on). That's the way it works with the Air. When Jobs first showed it off, you can see he made a point of showing it at an angle that made it look impossibly thin.

Sort of like how the new Jaguar XK was designed with a taper to the nose and tail, so that if you see it from an angle, it looks like there's no rear or front overhang at all.

ok i see
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.