Aren't most of the posts in this thread about it?
Actually, no. Most people are complaining about the fact that there might not be one.
Aren't most of the posts in this thread about it?
That's funny... I'd say that they DEFINITELY care, considering that they happen to sell those tools. Besides, Logic Express (the 'lite' version of Logic) is a $200 piece of 'ware targeted at the consumer market, and it still needs a good audio interface. Apple's going to turn around and prevent all Logic Express users from using a FW audio interface?
Hm... not buying it.
These are professional tools, I'm pretty sure that as far as Apple's concerned you don't use >$1000 worth of tool with a $1000 worth laptop.
I totally agree, with a slight change in design it is possible that we could several other ports on our macbooks insted of losing one!! Seen as apple are so good at the design of these things i would have thought they would have done this alread
These are professional tools, I'm pretty sure that as far as Apple's concerned you don't use >$1000 worth of tool with a $1000 worth laptop.
In other words, they don't care about that.
not if the hdd is encrypted
Not a huge fan of the potential loss of Firewire here.....
I do like some of the suggestions though of eSATA or HDMI additions though with only a few reservations:
HDMI: There are not many if any LCD computer monitors on the market that are cost effective that have HDMI connections. Hell most of the ones that finally have DVI still have VGA on the back! However, pro photogs will like the addition for viewing their shots on a nice HD screen. They, but I believe it was Dave Cross, had a nice small segment on PhotoshopUser TV a while back about this. However I just don't see this being a widely used viable option as a replacement to a widely used port that has many many periphs already on the market that use FW400.
eSATA: While this is the way I prefer to hook up external HDDs, that is all it is good for at this moment. If eSATA could be implemented into all other periphs from printers to scanners to DVD/Blu-Ray burners then I think it has some real legs to stand on. I know it is stupid to say but what if eSATA could be used in place of Gigabit Ethernet to network a small number of Macs together in a cluster? Would it not have maximum speeds roughly 3-4x faster?
the case still could end up being tapered like the Air. Not tapered down to such a small edge as in the Air, but tapered down to the edge that we're seeing in these photos. We haven't seen the screen or the bottom of the case, and these are the parts that would show the taper that we saw in this spy shot. So basically, the bottom of the case would bulge out, although I think someone measured and found that even the thickest part was still thinner than the current MBP. The taper still manages to make it LOOK a lot thinner than the MBP, and Apple's been doing perception tricks like that for decades.
I'm betting this photo is legit, those ports probably just barely fit along that edge and were obviously the limiting factor in the degree of that taper.
There seems to be a lot of people here who use Firewire, but I am sure there are a lot that don't. I fall into the latter category. I used to use it for a video cam, but since that died I have not used it at all. I have friends the same (none of them musicians mind) who don't use it all. But they don't have mac's though. Well in another 24 I guess we'll find out!!!![]()
that pic is cool.
look fat though
No. An I/O port is a significant modification, and means a completely different case and internal design, they're not going to add that as a $100 option, it makes absolutely no sense.What we are looking at may be JUST the $799 MacBook (that doesn't have firewire). Visualize it this way
13":
$799 - No firewire
$899 - Same specs + slightly better video/0.1 Ghz processor upgrade + firewire
$999 - ^ Same spec + HDD space + RAM
And so on...
What some of you need to understand is FW is pretty much dead. Or at least a rarity anymore. Especially if they include USB 3.0. But as far as FW, I haven't used in over three years. Nor has anyone that I know, except my brother. And the only reason he has used it is for a first generation iPod. Which is now at the bottom of a junk drawer.
I understand some people still use it, but no one is forcing you to buy a new MB. Like the guy that asked if Apple was going to buy him all new equipment if he buys a new MB. Why would Apple need to do that? It's not their decision as to whether you buy a new MB. Are they threatening you with a lawsuit if you don't?
I have plenty of obsolete technology. Get over it. There are plenty of notebooks that don't include FW anymore. And if you want it, you need to fork over the money to get it.
The same argument could be made for USB, but there are 2 of those damn ports.There seems to be a lot of people here who use Firewire, but I am sure there are a lot that don't.
What we are looking at may be JUST the $799 MacBook (that doesn't have firewire). Visualize it this way
13":
$799 - No firewire
$899 - Same specs + slightly better video/0.1 Ghz processor upgrade + firewire
$999 - ^ Same spec + HDD space + RAM
And so on...
I'm fairly sure that even the Mac Pro has a single FW bus (for its 4 ports).
The express card solution has two problems. First it does not supply power, so you have to have extra wires and power brick making you less mobile. Secondly the card pops out of the slot way too easily on the current MBP (at least my card does), and if attached to the Duet, that's instant kernel panic.
Actually, no. Most people are complaining about the fact that there might not be one.
I have plenty of obsolete technology. Get over it. There are plenty of notebooks that don't include FW anymore. And if you want it, you need to fork over the money to get it.
Like I said, someone measured that pic in a previous thread, and found that it was still thinner than the current MBP even at the fattest part. And I'll bet it would look really thin if seen from typical laptop viewing angle, (as in from above, not directly side-on). That's the way it works with the Air. When Jobs first showed it off, you can see he made a point of showing it at an angle that made it look impossibly thin.
Sort of like how the new Jaguar XK was designed with a taper to the nose and tail, so that if you see it from an angle, it looks like there's no rear or front overhang at all.