I'm not arguing, especially not with Harperjones.
You did say you haven't read every post but I myself did make the point about the premium being around since forever but the stores have been around since 2001. Now the money for those expensive stores have got to come from somewhere haven't they, we can't prove or disprove the premiums on macs financed the creation of the stores, but it is logical to assume that right? Anyway that part of the discussion isn't the important bit.
No, I don't think that it's necessarily logical to assume that. If there was a cause-and-effect event, meaning that Apple raised the prices on their products and then opened their first store, it would be logical to assume that the purpose of the premium is to finance the stores. I think that Apple would have opened stores and set them up in the way they did even if they didn't charge a premium, because they're excellent at marketing and they know how important it is to have a place to properly represent their products.
Now my main point is that HarperJones sees no value in how the features (could) play a role in the pricing of Apple's products, but my point to HarperJones is that a consumer can perceive value instead. Nobody can really argue with that because it's a subjective POV, HarperJones btw if you haven't read that particular post, said he doesn't value the Apple stores.
On the last point, you've simply brought up the same point that HarperJones did; that you can demo the machines, again not outlining out the other freebies and also while one person might not value those other freebies, a lot of other people (customers) will.
I, like you, can see the incredible value in the Apple Stores for Apple. They can design them the way they want to, display their products the way they want to, and train their staff the way they want to. Apple doesn't need to fully rely on the Resellers anymore- they've taken some (if not most) of the power back. However, I don't see the stores playing a major role in the pricing of their products. As we've both stated, Apple's prices have always been high, and I'd bet that there was no significant spike in pricing in 2001 (or in the years following) when the Apple Stores started to open. If there was a spike, I would agree with you 100%.
The reason that I brought up the "ability to demo at other stores" point, is because it's true. I don't understand what you mean by 'freebies'. When you go to the Apple Store, do they give you free software and iPhone cases or something? (If they do, can you take me with you the next time you go?
There's a yoga/gym clothing line called Lululemon. It is an expensive brand of yoga/gym clothes...... I would even consider them the Apple of yoga clothing. They offer free yoga and running classes in some (if not all) of their stores. Their clothing isn't expensive because of the free classes. Their clothing is expensive because they decided to charge a premium for it, and to help display the value, they do cool things like have free yoga classes. If they stopped having the classes, their prices wouldn't go down.
If Apple stopped having Genius bars and working product demos and seminars, their prices wouldn't go down either.
Apple products aren't expensive because of the way they run their stores. Their products are expensive because that is what Apple has decided to charge for them, and because the public has decided that they are willing to pay those prices for them. Could they go higher? Perhaps. I am sure that they have a team of accountants and actuaries that work for them with the aim of determining the perfect price points of each product. Go to high, people stop buying. Go too low, people won't think of them as them as premium products.