If it is anything like the M4 iPad, brightness level shouldn’t be a problem for the regular user.I mean th brightness display.
If it is anything like the M4 iPad, brightness level shouldn’t be a problem for the regular user.I mean th brightness display.
ThanksIf it is anything like the M4 iPad, brightness level shouldn’t be a problem for the regular user.
In your team.Nice option. I hate the glossy screens. However, I wish it was the standard matte coating by the panel manufacturer (see external displays and pc laptops with matte display) so it’s less fragile
A quick search helped me find this video by Marques Brownlee about the M4 ipad pro. He seems to say the same as you. He advises to "be very careful" if considering ordering nano texture, as it affects sharpness, contrast and the appearance of blacks (direct link to where he shows the nano texture screen on the ipad pro):If you do visual creative work the Nano-texture display is a no go. The display casts a blurry fog on all your content. It's not important or very noticeable for the average user, but sharpness details are lost a bit on fine detail/text. If the client asks why something is blurry, you won't be able to see what they are talking about because everything is fuzzy on your end. This isnt like the matte displays they offered in 2017.
For consuming content the nano-texture is great.
Edit - my review on Nano texture is for the Studio Displays. Maybe they are doing laptops differently? But it sounds like same technique.
Nano is hyped up name for Matte Screen. Obviously being offered at a $$$, it offers a little bit more refined experience than raw Matte.I still dont get the idea of loving matte or nano texture as it kills the contrast ratio and no advantages over glossy displays in many ways.
how would nano texture improve my health?Nano is hyped up name for Matte Screen. Obviously being offered at a $$$, it offers a little bit more refined experience than raw Matte.
This throws us back to 2006-2010: we had even the same laptops offered in gloss and matte, matte being a slightly premium version. But then manufacturers switched to glossy, because it is easier to increase contrast without going overboard like Apple did for much cheaper. Then we had a decade of glossy only laptops.
The reality is with my matte 720P dell i could spend 20hrs a day for 7 days and no eye strain. With Macs (i am using them since 2013) I always struggle to work more than 8 hrs on it.
TLDR: If you have money, Nano is better for health. Health can not be bought for $$$. Matte is superior option for health safet - US Coke does come with corn syrup not because it is better, but because the cane sugar and beetle sugar is much more expensive. US french fries come with 24 ingredients not because they are tastier than European ones which have only 5, but because of cost cutting measures without giving .02 cents about people's health.
A fellow student had a 2011 17" in silver, back in uni, and it was the coolest thing ever.Aw, this takes me back to the days of my matte 17" MacBook Pro...
Don't forget charging for PWM free (or less) screens. Currently, 74% of devices are better than ipad pro in terms of PWM.Apple knows matte is better. They just needed to find a way to charge more for it.
Once they figure out how to charge for DC dimming, disabling temporal dithering, and disabling jelly scrolling, then we'll be talking!
Basic phone $999. Phone with a good display that's easy on the eyes $1499.
Thanks. I canceled my order and placed a new one with the nano texture. Silver M4 Max 64GB is coming 😍In 2010s i was using 720P dell matte screen. It was washed out but was really easy on the eye. Since then i upgraded to retina macs and all of that, so probably would be hard to go back to the same feeling.
Glossy - color pop but reflective as a mirror.
Nano - washed out colors but easier on the eyes.
I will be able to tell if this right in a few days. Very similr stuff happened between the Samsung S95C and S95D TV.A quick search helped me find this video by Marques Brownlee about the M4 ipad pro. He seems to say the same as you. He advises to "be very careful" if considering ordering nano texture, as it affects sharpness, contrast and the appearance of blacks (direct link to where he shows the nano texture screen on the ipad pro):
a man's gotta do what a man's gotta do16" Silver MacBook Pro MAX with nano screen, 128GB of ram and 8TB SSD is in my future.
A fellow student had a 2011 17" in silver, back in uni, and it was the coolest thing ever.
Glossy is a ****I still dont get the idea of loving matte or nano texture as it kills the contrast ratio and no advantages over glossy displays in many ways.
RIP your kids college fund 😂16" Silver MacBook Pro MAX with nano screen, 128GB of ram and 8TB SSD is in my future.
if only that is a booger that were dropped in the AM onto the keyboard and the person tried to close the lid by the evening when that thing became hard as rock.Will a speck of dust on your keyboard still be enough to crack the screen glass still? 🤔