Come on now, you can't be serious.
You would rather do without a new modern design, w/ improved graphics, speed, battery life, etc, just because you don't want to spend a few bucks on a piece of film which essentially provides the matte effect that you desire in your screen.
You buy accessories all the time to achieve different levels of customization on the standard $2,000.00 model. Things like; software, bags, cases, adapters, pads, blue tooth mice & keyboards, drives, headphones, speaker systems. microphones, remote, etc. etc. The list is almost endless. But a piece of matte film is out of the question.
Is it matte film or antiglare film? The two are not the same. I share the sentiment expressed by Motulist.
Long live matte!
matte vs. glossy is a preference like chocolate vs. vanilla. Neither is inherently better, but many people have a VERY strong preference for one over the other. I'd eat no-name store brand chocolate ice cream before I'd eat even haagen daz brand vanilla. I personally cannot stand glossy in any environment other than a completely dark room. Some people have little preference in screen type, but many people strongly prefer one over the other.
Apple definitely should offer consumers an option of matte or glossy. I will not buy a laptop that has a glossy screen. I know that someone here mentioned that you can get an anti-glare coating to put over your screen, but the pictures I've seen of them have not made them look like they do a good enough job that I'd be happy with. Notice that they call it an anti-glare filter film, not a matte film. In fact even in their own product promo picture on that page you can see insane amounts of reflections coming of of it!