Wrong
I still dont get it, the surface on the MBP looks really sparkly, sure there is some ISO noise and other noise in the picture but the MBP itself looks really weird anyway.
Wrong
I don't think Apple has ever had a reasonably-priced CTO upgrade.The base Pro will still look weak because it will ship with a 320GB HDD. However, upgrade to a 128GB or 256GB SSD and the story changes dramatically. I'm guessing they will be reasonably-priced CTO upgrades.
oh... you are wrong, becouse there is the core i5 2410M with the same specs as the leaked pictures.
and... there is no other possibility for apple in the 13'' to do it without an intel gpu. only with an dedicated gpu-card and this is for the 15 or 17''.
How do customers lose by Apple having a larger margin than their competitors?
Don't be rude, he just gave you facts and they are true. I will not judge apple yet, but if this spec to a price around 1100$ is true, it's just sad and disappoining...
1280x800 just doesn't make any sense. Why wouldn't they just use the same HD screen for the 13" MBA?
You are still exaggerating.
It's got the i5 in it. Somehow an i5 is severely underpowered? I'm not sure what planet you are from.
Lenovo G560 usually less than $700 but its on a 15 inch screen , HP does it for a lower price. I am not sure what 13 inch models are out there.
Like I said, it's underpowered...
Yes it has a big CPU but overall it's gonna feel slower than the Air in daily basic computing tasks (because of the slow hard drive) and it's gonna be at best performing the same in games as last years model.
It's only gonna be better in some specific CPU intensive apps.
I really want a MBP because of the form factor and the features not because of the specs but somehow I was still hoping for something decent...
I guess I'll have to consider which is better for my use: this with a student discount or a refurbed 2010 one.
It's just...a very underwhelming update![]()
simple.. they charge more for less value...
let's say the macbook costs 400$ in production and they charge 1000$.. apple wins 600$ -> large margin BUT us (the customers) have to pay 1000$ for a 400$ macbook!
if apple wouldn't the so greedy they could charge less and more of us would be happy apple customers![]()
Please tell me you are joking...
The alienware is significantly taller than any MBP. If I wanted a hunk of plastic that a company stuffed full of hardware, didn't care about build quality, ran Windows, and was the height of Webster's dictionary, I'd be a Dell, HP, Gateway, Alienware customer.
As it is, I will GLADLY pay a premium for a solidly built laptop that runs OS X.
People comparing this to what Acer (or alienware) has to offer makes me giggle.
Lenovo G560 usually less than $700 but its on a 15 inch screen , HP does it for a lower price. I am not sure what 13 inch models are out there.
About as hard as handling a driver and having working fine manipulators.Slightly off topic: How hard is it to put an SSD into these unibody Macbooks?
Slightly off topic: How hard is it to put an SSD into these unibody Macbooks?