There you go.![]()
hahaha, perfect. That guy should have looked at the buyer's guide lol
There you go.![]()
Hey all~
I'm in desperate need of a new laptop, still rocking the Powerbook G4. Needed for class now, needed for trip to Japan at the end of April.
Wait for an unkown re-vamped model, unknown release date?
Buy one now because it's here now?
However, if you are right about the 13" MacBook Pro then I'd say the following is just as likely of an outcome:
For spring 2011, there is NO change in the CPU architectures in any of the MacBooks, Apple skips Sandy Bridge and we'll all have to wait for Ivy Bridge. If this happens, as I've said before, I think nearly everyone will be disappointed in this year's MacBooks (except for perhaps the MacBook Airs).
That's a ridiculous prediction, but even more so if you're including the MBP into it. No way Apple is going to force consumers to wait until late 2011 to get their hands on the 2nd gen i-Core Intel chipsets.
Ridiculous? I don't know. Unlikely, perhaps. Unfortunate, very definitely.That's a ridiculous prediction, but even more so if you're including the MBP into it. No way Apple is going to force consumers to wait until late 2011 to get their hands on the 2nd gen i-Core Intel chipsets.
They don't get meatier than Sandy Bridge. Though I wouldn't hold my breath on the 13" Pro, if I were you.
Is that discount more, the same, or less than the standard academic discount?
Okay - really gotta pull the trigger soon and say bye to my early 2006 1.83Ghz CD.
Therefore I agree with fpnc and think the 13" MBP will definitely stay, hopefuly with the best upgrade possible, not just some minor changes.
The 13 can't take the Intel core series (which have to have an integrated graphics card) and a second graphics card.
As a general rule of thumb, I usually give Apple at least two years between each major redesign on their prosumer systems. The interesting thing is that the 15" unibody MacBook Pro and the unibody MacBook were both released in Oct. 2008 which means that both have now been on the market for just over two years (just a bit over two years and two months to be exact). In the period between these major updates Apple usually brings spec and CPU/GPU upgrades, which since switching to Intel works out fairly well as Intel is on a so-called tick-tock upgrade cycle that generally runs about one year for each tick or tock ( http://www.intel.com/technology/tick-tock/index.htm ). So, Apple does a major revision about every two years (architecture and/or form factor) and then gets a significant bump in the CPU right in the middle of that two year cycle. What this means is that the unibody products might be set to have a major redesign in the next few months. And guess what, that fits right in with the next major "tock" on Intel's CPU architecture roadmap (Sandy Bridge).The real issue is that the current 15 and 17 could take Sandy Bridge and its integrated graphics and keep their second graphics card. The 13 can't take the Intel core series (which have to have an integrated graphics card) and a second graphics card. So the 13 will either have to have Intel integrated graphics (not really acceptable to the Professional community as they are widely considered to be weak) or a complete redesign to create space for the 2-card solution.
So the question becomes - is it a refresh of the current model, in which case 15 and 17 can go Sandy Bridge, but the 13 would have to be handicapped, or is it a complete redesign. A complete redesign would probably warrant some kind of big Apple event? What's on the horizon?
Can't see them reducing the price of the Air three months down the line, by the way.
I agree 100%. In fact other manufactures have managed discrete graphics in systems similar to the 13" MacBook Pro's form factor. Of course, you're not going to find many systems (or any systems) that are an exact duplicate to either of Apple's full-featured 13" MacBooks. Once you figure in Apple's profit margins and some of the Mac's unique features it's hard to make direct comparisons to determine what may or may not be possible.People make this claim as if it were a fact.
Only the Apple motherboard engineers know whether it's possible to include a separate graphics chip (not "card") on the board.
Parts get smaller, more integrated (so you need fewer of them), a port could be removed or moved, the battery could be made slightly smaller (since Sandy Bridge can use less power, this wouldn't necessarily reduce battery life).
Apple's engineers may surprise you.
People make this claim as if it were a fact.
Only the Apple motherboard engineers know whether it's possible to include a separate graphics chip (not "card") on the board.
Parts get smaller, more integrated (so you need fewer of them), a port could be removed or moved, the battery could be made slightly smaller (since Sandy Bridge can use less power, this wouldn't necessarily reduce battery life).
Apple's engineers may surprise you.
DSGi UK (Currys & PC World) update: down to 193 mbp 13" in central warehouses. This number was 300+ yesterday. Most likely those were shipped to stores.
People make this claim as if it were a fact.
Only the Apple motherboard engineers know whether it's possible to include a separate graphics chip (not "card") on the board.
Parts get smaller, more integrated (so you need fewer of them), a port could be removed or moved, the battery could be made slightly smaller (since Sandy Bridge can use less power, this wouldn't necessarily reduce battery life).
Apple's engineers may surprise you.
does apple really have motherboard engineers? i thought the boards were made by foxconn or nvidia.
The real issue is that the current 15 and 17 could take Sandy Bridge and its integrated graphics and keep their second graphics card. The 13 can't take the Intel core series (which have to have an integrated graphics card) and a second graphics card. So the 13 will either have to have Intel integrated graphics (not really acceptable to the Professional community as they are widely considered to be weak) or a complete redesign to create space for the 2-card solution.
So the question becomes - is it a refresh of the current model, in which case 15 and 17 can go Sandy Bridge, but the 13 would have to be handicapped, or is it a complete redesign. A complete redesign would probably warrant some kind of big Apple event? What's on the horizon?
Can't see them reducing the price of the Air three months down the line, by the way.
I'm interested in how the MacBook and 15/17in stock.
Maybe a refresh february 2