gmckenzi said:
I had a 15" and used to shake my head in wonderment at my colleagues that had 17" monsters. I always swore that I wouldn't go with a 17". Earlier this year after receiving and returning five (!) 15" models at a local retailer (they all suffered from batteries that wouldn't charge) I finally gave in an got a 17" inch because I knew from the forums that the 17" models didn't have the battery production problem that was affecting the 15" models.
All I can say is that I couldn't go back to a 15" now. Yes it is bigger, but the screen size is just plain beautiful. I didn't think I'd be swayed, but now I couldn't go back. I had to experience it first.
Gavin.
Bobthemonkey said:
go with the 15 - i've ogt a 17 desktop replacent pc and frankly its just too big to carray around all day - it does jhave one nicefeature though - instead of the dead space either side of the keyboard, the letters are moved to the left, and and full number pad is fitted, like on a proper keyboard.
The 17 is so heavy that im getting my first mac very soon for uni - the basic macbook with edu. discount and maybe a wireless mighty mouse (if i cna get a good answer on how musch these affect the battery of the macbook)
Hmmm, youngsters...
😉 The ancient PB Pismo, weighed about the
same ~8lbs. as the current 17in MBP, it was thicker than the 17in (probably a littler cooler running), but dimentionally the major difference is in width only. The 17in has less of a frame around the LCD screen, so height is virtually
identical. A 20in laptop (widescreen) would be a bit too large for most, but for Pros or gamers, having ultra HD screen (few years down the road due to technology/cost, Nividia's 7900/7800 mobile GPU's already support hardware accelaration for driving the 30in ACD, Nivida calls it Extreme HD, but it's not really, only 1/2 way to 4k res.) would be even nicer.
17in MBP really, really needs at least a 2k res screen upgrade. Problem with most higher end GPU's on the mobile side, is they consume too much power, can run in performance mode (are pretty much useless on high-end games in power saving modes) only when pulled into AC...no battery usage
🙁. Nividia G7900 GS is the lower power 20w variant, unfortunately you can't run HD res games (2k res) with this GPU, you need the full G7900 Go GTX & 512MB mem.
Josias said:
God! Get it! The X1600 is not underclocked dammit!😛
They run at same speed as any other X1600 in PCs.
I don't believe in nVidia cards for portables. Yes, the 12" PB has GeForce Go5200, but still, the MBP has to reamin 1" thin.😉
Uh, Josias; go take a look at this site, Apple underclocks the X1600, probably due to thermal issues:
Differences in ATI X1600 Clock speed in Macs vs PCs,
Overclocking using ATITool in Win XP