![]()
Ha Ha.....JK
What browser is that? Looks weird (I've always used Safari).
It's Google Chrome. I prefer Safari but on my old HP, Chrome seems a bit more stable.
What browser is that? Looks weird (I've always used Safari).
So from the past few pages of pictures
- September 23 update of many Macs:
- All MacBook Pros will be updated
- All Mac minis will be updated
- Midrange MacBook stays, gets a big pricedrop (lower margins ) to be sub-$1000, so it's now the low-end MacBook
- Two or so new aluminum MacBooks at >$1000, to fill the area above the white MacBook
- Probably nothing else
![]()
So from the past few pages of pictures
- September 23 update of many Macs:
- All MacBook Pros will be updated
- All Mac minis will be updated
- Midrange MacBook stays, gets a big pricedrop (lower margins ) to be sub-$1000, so it's now the low-end MacBook
- Two or so new aluminum MacBooks at >$1000, to fill the area above the white MacBook
- Probably nothing else
![]()
The thread that will never die.
At least not until this Tuesday. Or next Tuesday. Or the one after that...![]()
Since the low-end MacBook will have a SuperDrive, it's safe to say the aluminum ones will too.Does that involve dedicated graphics and no combo drive in the Macbook?![]()
Since the low-end MacBook will have a SuperDrive, it's safe to say the aluminum ones will too.But with the graphics, it's a different story. People seem to think that if the MacBook goes aluminum, it'll be basically a smaller MacBook Pro.
In other words, the MacBook would still have an integrated GPU.
Joking based on the disappearance of products on the Apple Store aside, I expect SuperDrives in any notebook $999 or higher and integrated GPUs in MacBooks. The good news is that if Apple goes to NVIDIA chipsets, we would see much better integrated GPUs.
It's getting messy now over around ~$800. You're seeing fewer IGP and more really low end discrete solutions or IGP with dedicated VRAM.Yeah, but still absolutely the worst graphics processing you can find on a notebook greater than $1000, most likely.![]()
It's getting messy now over around ~$800. You're seeing fewer IGP and more really low end discrete solutions or IGP with dedicated VRAM.
Sadly Apple loves to pick expensive processors to prop up the slow IGP solutions and wonderful "it's faster!" benchmarks on their pages.Right, and that's what the Macbook needs. A low-end dedicated GPU. Either that, or price it at $600 where it belongs.
Sadly Apple loves to pick expensive processors to prop up the slow IGP solutions and wonderful "it's faster!" benchmarks on their pages.
I expect $999 as being a "good price" for a 2.26 GHz, 2 GB RAM, SuperDrive, and, GMA X4500HD Macbook.
So from the past few pages of pictures
- September 23 update of many Macs:
- All MacBook Pros will be updated
- All Mac minis will be updated
- Midrange MacBook stays, gets a big pricedrop (lower margins ) to be sub-$1000, so it's now the low-end MacBook
- Two or so new aluminum MacBooks at >$1000, to fill the area above the white MacBook
- Probably nothing else
![]()
I would be surprised to find an update this Tuesday, although it would renew some confidence (for me) in Apple's computers.
I am fairly disappointed in Apple for what I view as a shift of focus towards the iPhone. Yes they are cool and I want one, but I think that the computers that they make have suffered because of it.
The mediocre bump in February left a lot to be desired, combined with the GPU failures and LED issues in the MBP's I would say that Apple has already made it clear that they are in no hurry to update the hardware to accommodate these fixes.
I also hope that they don't decide to make the laptops thinner...the smaller you get in a laptop the higher the likelihood of heat related failure, not to mention the inevitable reduction in specs. Lighter is more important than thinner IMHO.
Finally if Apple continues selling the MBP's without an update, and then updates the MB's, then Im fairly certain that Steve has lost his mind. I understand that they are trying to make the consumer line super accessible and that for the average user, these updates would not be noticeable. But I firmly believe that the Pro lines should be a huge jump above the consumer lines.
I would be surprised to find an update this Tuesday, although it would renew some confidence (for me) in Apple's computers.
I am fairly disappointed in Apple for what I view as a shift of focus towards the iPhone. Yes they are cool and I want one, but I think that the computers that they make have suffered because of it.
The mediocre bump in February left a lot to be desired, combined with the GPU failures and LED issues in the MBP's I would say that Apple has already made it clear that they are in no hurry to update the hardware to accommodate these fixes.
Interesting. You mean "really low end" as in as far below low-end as low-end is below midrange?It's getting messy now over around ~$800. You're seeing fewer IGP and more really low end discrete solutions or IGP with dedicated VRAM.
I have found that I need more CPU power than GPU power. However, I don't see why Apple can't just offer the opposite as a BTO option.Yeah, I'm a firm believer in lower-end processors (I never have had need for a lot of CPU power) and higher-end graphics. Unfortunately, that's exactly the opposite of what Apple offers.
The MacBooks are still there but look at this:
![]()
What's up? Does anyone else see this?
Of course there is.
Either the Apple store is screwed up, or people are PS'ing for fun.