Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm staying on Mojave on my main machine because I still use Aperture - it's not compatible with Catalina

I plan on getting a second iMac to run Catalina and newer software

Eventually I plan on switching to Adobe..
Same here - I am using some apps that are not compatible with Catalina, so will have to stick with Mojave. I am not a gamer, so not sure I'll be missing much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Justin Cymbal
Sort thread by most liked would have meant I did not have to read a dozen messages of folks interpreting what a superscript numeral means in written English. I sure hope “sort by most liked” returns to this forum soon
 
  • Like
Reactions: orbital~debris
I will hold off. Since Apple had to replace my 2018 mac mini's logic board, it will not install Catalina PB for anything.
 
I can’t believe they released iOS and iPadOS without macOS being ready.

Because of the compatibility issues between different versions of reminders. Would it really have been that difficult to wait the additional week or two to release everything in sync?

As it is, i now have broken shared reminders between myself and the GF, because she updated and upgraded, and i didn’t can’t because my mac isn’t compatible yet and she didn’t know that. So she lost access to my shared reminders list for the household.

I’m sure there are others with more serious problems caused by this, heaven forbid any sort of business is using these applications to do actual work with.
There should be no business environment bold enough to even think about testing Catalina. Me as a home user and casual user don‘t even want to upgrade to Mojave because of weird huge performance drop after upgrading. Instead, I am testing Catalina on a separate SSD.
 
Sure it's a misprint or typo.
The "4" in superscript seems too coincidental.

Usually there comes a RC, then GM... sometimes 2nd GM)

I vote for "end of October"
 
  • Like
Reactions: nihil0
I'm staying on Mojave on my main machine because I still use Aperture - it's not compatible with Catalina

I plan on getting a second iMac to run Catalina and newer software

Eventually I plan on switching to Adobe..

Setup a Virtual Machine with a older macOS version for Aperture, this should do it for ever.
 
Skipping the upgrade for the first time in 18 years.

Losing 32 bit apps like indesign CS6 is just too much.

Unless someone can suggest a parallels VM solution?
 
Skipping the upgrade for the first time in 18 years.

Losing 32 bit apps like indesign CS6 is just too much.

Unless someone can suggest a parallels VM solution?
Stay away from Parallels. Super expensive, horrible support.
I had it for 1 year and I stopped subscription.

I moved to VMWare, not the best but works fine. I am also thinking on holding back however this is not Apple's fault.

Lazy developers don't update their SW for 64 bits since many many years. I agree with Apple that 64 bit should have been a standard long ago and they have sent many warnings to users and devs as well that their apps will no longer be supported.

In the same time, it does impact me quite a bit but I have 2 machines so one will be around until I find SW companies that make 64 bit code and do what I need.

To be honest, I cannot blame developers either. The world of consumers goes mobile fully (phones and tablets) and the laptop market is not the biggest cash cow, so no wonder their efforts go that direction.
So I suppose businesses are more inclined to invest in places where they can make more profits.

Maybe it's just me, but I start to see a clearer delimitation between uses of OS-es like it was in the past:

Linux - SW Development for VMs, Real-Time embedded systems, servers and security appliances
Windows - Gaming and some level of content creation
Mac OS X - Content Creation only (music, videos and photography)
iOS, iPad OS, Android - consumer social media, gaming, consumer content creation

This is maybe why Mac OS X is now lagging behind in release dates and does not care anymore for legacy 32 bit SW, it's simply not worth the effort.
 
I'm experiencing 0 bugs. Am on iOS 13.1 and Catalina
[automerge]1569547728[/automerge]

The hoops through which we jump to avoid the present

Same here, bugs have been ironed out for me so far and no crashes on Public Beta.
 
Just looked on my phone, in the UK, and I have a superscript 2 instead of a 4. I guess the release date is anyone’s guess at the moment
 

Attachments

  • CFCEE7AD-5004-4496-8CA8-800DB58D5B1C.jpeg
    CFCEE7AD-5004-4496-8CA8-800DB58D5B1C.jpeg
    105.5 KB · Views: 111
Sort thread by most liked would have meant I did not have to read a dozen messages of folks interpreting what a superscript numeral means in written English. I sure hope “sort by most liked” returns to this forum soon

Wait, that was a thing? Sounds convenient. Never knew about it though.
 
4. Apple Arcade and Apple TV+ require a subscription. Apple Arcade is now available on iPhone, iPad and Apple TV and will be available on Mac later this year.

The 4 is to indicate a footnote, I would say there was a translation error on the Danish site is all.
 
There should be no business environment bold enough to even think about testing Catalina. Me as a home user and casual user don‘t even want to upgrade to Mojave because of weird huge performance drop after upgrading. Instead, I am testing Catalina on a separate SSD.

Sounds very much like a "you're holding it wrong" excuse to me.

Microsoft would be crucified over something like this in say, Outlook 2019, so Apple should be held to the same standards.
 
Any one know if this will support the shared folder Notes system that ios13 does? Because man it's a PITA now already!!
 
Just looked on my phone, in the UK, and I have a superscript 2 instead of a 4. I guess the release date is anyone’s guess at the moment

Not sure how you see that as the 4 is on all sites worldwide. I'm in the UK too and looking at the USA or UK sites show a 4 for me.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.