That's what I said last year when I decided to skip Ventura. So this year I'll upgrade at Sonoma.1.So, in other words there's no real reason to upgrade.
That's what I said last year when I decided to skip Ventura. So this year I'll upgrade at Sonoma.1.So, in other words there's no real reason to upgrade.
If you were used to the same on a phone or tablet, widgets might excite you, but not like the MacOS really needs a bunch of mini-apps (widgets) to be showing all the time. Even with a laptop we played this widget game previously and it's not that big a draw, just uses up desktop space instead of resizable windows.So basically desktop widgets, safari tweaks and new screen savers.. so underwhelming
They were handy back in 10.4 and 10.6. I won't object to having them back.Desktop widgets…I’m sure they can be helpful but I can’t help but feel like it’s a reiteration of Windows V***a
I am sure Apple could do an about-face if they wanted to. They can obviously write an Intel-to-ARM translation layer. It's purely a business decision, and it's despicable. I hope Tim Cook's successor stops hammering customers and actually allows Apple to live up to the "empowering users" mantra they inherited from decades past.I still believe there was no good reason to drop support for 32-bit apps. I have Steam games, video editing software etc. that functioned before but don't now. It's so stupid.
I totally agree. Apple has fallen into the Android and Windows more is better open pit. Less performance producing software will always beat bloated piles of garbage software. Two years with needed updates a good starting point.I really wish Apple would stop with the yearly OSX releases. Its exhausting wondering if your apps are all going to be compatible and in the end I just end up waiting several months until I know everything works and there won't be an app I need that hasn't been updated or crashes regularly.
Just refine what we have and go on a two year cycle of upgrades. Then they will seem more significant.
OR… they became useful instead of a near useless calendar or weather widget. This came under Tim Cook's leadership remember. As usual, things improve and get reinvented because of the App Store.So we had widgets in 2005….Apple said “no this is dumb” and got rid of them…..now in 2023 widgets are a new thing….again…oook
I think it’ll be more useful than the old screen and definitely better than that horrible notifications bar they use on the current system.If you were used to the same on a phone or tablet, widgets might excite you, but not like the MacOS really needs a bunch of mini-apps (widgets) to be showing all the time. Even with a laptop we played this widget game previously and it's not that big a draw, just uses up desktop space instead of resizable windows.
Same here.My 2017 iMac is running just fine but isn’t supported? Seems like forced obsoletion.
Yep... My iMac Pro sits on Mojave to this day for this reason. I've got a number of 32-bit programs I want to use, and especially with all the nonsense Apple keeps putting in recent MacOS releases? I don't feel like I'm missing much.I am sure Apple could do an about-face if they wanted to. They can obviously write an Intel-to-ARM translation layer. It's purely a business decision, and it's despicable. I hope Tim Cook's successor stops hammering customers and actually allows Apple to live up to the "empowering users" mantra they inherited from decades past.
So basically desktop widgets, safari tweaks and new screen savers.. so underwhelming
I'll be sorely tempted to upgrade, but I will have to let my work computer sit with Ventura until I can be sure there are no issues with my mission critical apps like Illustrator and InDesign -- as well as the Google Drive client which we use to sync files.
Anyone on the betas using any of that software? Curious to hear how it's going. Thanks!
So Sonoma should be an improvement on stability & performance from Ventura.
If you looked at it this way, how far back should Apple keep supporting current OS? Besides the iMac from 2019 and iMac Pro (2017), the base requirement seems to be mixed with either a T2 security chip or 8-gen Intel processor.Same here.
I always hate the idea of loading an OS to a display. Gone are the days of just simple plug and play display that just works. Don’t get me wrong, many selling today still largely function that way, but this studio display starts a terrible trend in the monitor industry to further incentivise planned obsolescence.My Studio Display stopped working after a beta driver update, though, 4-5 days now. I'm now firmly convinced that it's the worst thing Apple has released since the butterfly keyboard, and anyone interested should walk right past it to the Samsung.
By standing up, you mean they resign and form a new company/find a new job?To the Apple engineers reading this: stand up to your bosses and work for the betterment of everyone, not your CEO's stock price.
It will keep up. You should plan on downgrading now.I'm going to consider downgrading to Mojave if this keeps up.
the "underwhelming" features could (most of the time) be implemented as standalone apps or updates (feature packs?) untethered from the OS upgrade cycle.
To the Apple engineers reading this: stand up to your bosses and work for the betterment of everyone, not your CEO's stock price.
I'm going to consider downgrading to Mojave if this keeps up.