Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That's not exactly right. They made it drastically easier for devs to port non-native games to Mac. We won't see the fruits of this for another quarter or two.

I was wondering if Baldur's Gate 3 was accomplished with this new tech, but it runs on macOS 10.15 "Catalina," so evidently not.
Ah, that was it. I was thinking of the Game Porting Toolkit.
From what I read, it's possible for users to achieve compatibility for non-Mac games through that but the steps to achieve it look quite complicated.

We'll see what the future brings :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎
Remember when Apple stole the whole "Widget thing" from Konfabulator about 20 years ago? I was a paying KonFab customer then and loved that app but admit I loved the OSX integration.

After several years languishing on the vine, it eventually disappeared from Mac OS.

Until it became "Notification Center," which also blows and has languished since introduction.

But now it will return in it's latest incarnation. 🥱

cjr
I still remember my Performa 476 (which was an LC 475 with 68LC040 processor) with MacOS 7.1P3, I believe, and two easier launchers, full of widgets. Neither really caught on, but now, we have Launchpad for the same thing. Apple doesn't really kill ideas, they just regurgitate them every few years.

I'm looking forward to Sonoma and iOS 17.1.1 but I might have to wait to be safe.
 
did you even bother to read the section "Compatibility"?
How many things won't be included in the first production release for country Z? How many things will not work without restrictions? History tells us that nothing is certain.
 
Based on iOS17 and multiple other releases, I think I'll wait a week or two, until after the not uncommon "security & bug fixes" that get pumped out shortly after the initial release. :).
Summer 2024 looks like a good date to upgrade. We are still fighting the bugs in the current release.
 
  • Like
Reactions: parameter
Will it have the same 80% battery level switch as iOS on the iPhone 15's? I'm REALLY sick of it always topping to 100% if I switch off the charger when the notebook is sleeping.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎
I still remember my Performa 476 (which was an LC 475 with 68LC040 processor) with MacOS 7.1P3, I believe, and two easier launchers, full of widgets. Neither really caught on, but now, we have Launchpad for the same thing. Apple doesn't really kill ideas, they just regurgitate them every few years.
I loved Launcher in Mac OS 7! At first that is all I could do with the Mac (PacMac yeah!). Eventually learned to open up the HD and explore the OS more but Launcher was where all the apps were easily located.
 
As I have a 2016 MacBook Pro which will only go up to Monterey it's interesting to find that I see little difference moving onto my M1 Mac Mini which has Ventura. Perhaps that's the point? After about 5 years the incremental changes really build up but maybe it's all for the best that quantum leaps don't happen every time.
 
Absurd that a fully packed iMac 27inch 5K from 2017 isn't allowed to run this iteration of macOS where it is just a tiny incremental upgrade from the previous one. It makes clear that Apple is all about profit maximalization these days.
I guess you weren't around when the Apple II was US$2495 or the original Mac or the Mac Portable was US$6495. Yes, it's just now that they're all about money.
 
I guess you weren't around when the Apple II was US$2495 or the original Mac or the Mac Portable was US$6495. Yes, it's just now that they're all about money.
5k 27" iMac users have been left high and dry now there is no equivalent product for them to upgrade to. Yes, I know they could buy the Studio Display and add a Mini or Studio but I know several people who have now abandoned the upgrade route because they are confused by Apple's change of direction. They saw the iMac as a one-stop solution that was straightforward to implement. They see the new solution as applying to professionals or at least prosumers. Those 27" users also don't want to downgrade to a smaller 24" option which is also beginning to look neglected. Just to top things off the ideal of a 5K screen to achieve appropriate scaling leaves limited choice - Apple or Samsung with the LG option having received poor reviews. I'm not sure why Apple has done this or if there are any stats to show a decline in purchasing by older, more casual buyers.
 
I guess you weren't around when the Apple II was US$2495 or the original Mac or the Mac Portable was US$6495. Yes, it's just now that they're all about money.
I know prices of Macs were always higher then the other brands but the thing is that nowadays the quality is deminishing and the support for it also. Back in the days the ratio Price:Quality was 50:50 now it is 90:10.
 
Absurd that a fully packed iMac 27inch 5K from 2017 isn't allowed to run this iteration of macOS where it is just a tiny incremental upgrade from the previous one.
If you think the update is tiny and incremental then it isn't a big deal if you don't get it. You will still get security updates.
It makes clear that Apple is all about profit maximalization these days.
These days? Steve Jobs' Apple stopped supporting all PowerPC Macs pretty quickly. 2011 Lion was the last OS to support PowerPC, two years after 2009's Snow Leopard.
 
Last edited:
But it is in a way, cause you don't get to run the latest OS. It gives at least the feel of obsolescence. And by the next iteration it will be.
You can still run all the apps and services and you will receive security updates for years now. Additionally, every year there is a big "Current OS on unsupported Macs" thread; Sonoma will be no different so you'll be able to run it on your iMac. May take a month or two, but since you don't think much of Sonoma it shouldn't be a big deal waiting.
 
Hopefully, there are some performance improvements. Otherwise, the only feature that looks useful to me is "One-Time verification code AutoFill from Mail helps you quickly sign into sites in Safari, without leaving the browser". This might be the first time 15 years that I haven't updated to OS version on day one.
 
OR… they became useful instead of a near useless calendar or weather widget. This came under Tim Cook's leadership remember. As usual, things improve and get reinvented because of the App Store.
There were already useful third party widgets at the time and a whole dev kit for them. The AppStore is irrelevant. Widgets were not an idea of Tim Cook’s leadership….they were a Jobs thing. Either Apple failed to market them, or they were a stupid idea for a desktop OS. Widgets were essentially the visual model for the first iPhone apps. I think they were useful in prepping people for the iPhone app experience. Today it just seems stupid and out of place. I bet today they are being used in the opposite way. A tool to get people used to the next wave of either a more dumbed down macOS interface they want to push later….or for the headset UI. There is a reason and it’s not because Tim made them better.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.