I'll wait for macOS Montecito with Harry+Meghan emojis and wallpapers. Or whatever the final macOS with Intel support will be... probably next year and that's it for Intel. macOS 15 end of the road perhaps.
Ah, that was it. I was thinking of the Game Porting Toolkit.That's not exactly right. They made it drastically easier for devs to port non-native games to Mac. We won't see the fruits of this for another quarter or two.
I was wondering if Baldur's Gate 3 was accomplished with this new tech, but it runs on macOS 10.15 "Catalina," so evidently not.
I still remember my Performa 476 (which was an LC 475 with 68LC040 processor) with MacOS 7.1P3, I believe, and two easier launchers, full of widgets. Neither really caught on, but now, we have Launchpad for the same thing. Apple doesn't really kill ideas, they just regurgitate them every few years.Remember when Apple stole the whole "Widget thing" from Konfabulator about 20 years ago? I was a paying KonFab customer then and loved that app but admit I loved the OSX integration.
After several years languishing on the vine, it eventually disappeared from Mac OS.
Until it became "Notification Center," which also blows and has languished since introduction.
But now it will return in it's latest incarnation. 🥱
cjr
How many things won't be included in the first production release for country Z? How many things will not work without restrictions? History tells us that nothing is certain.did you even bother to read the section "Compatibility"?
Summer 2024 looks like a good date to upgrade. We are still fighting the bugs in the current release.Based on iOS17 and multiple other releases, I think I'll wait a week or two, until after the not uncommon "security & bug fixes" that get pumped out shortly after the initial release..
Thank you for sharing.As long as safari is working bug free ill be updating soon after the release.
Indeed, or the annoying bug where Finder loses its focus on NAS volumes.Apple has finally fixed the wake from sleep issue.
….well, one can dream
"What's a widget?" Thornton Mellon
"Let's just say it's a fictional product. It doesn't matter." Dr. Phillip Barbay
I loved Launcher in Mac OS 7! At first that is all I could do with the Mac (PacMac yeah!). Eventually learned to open up the HD and explore the OS more but Launcher was where all the apps were easily located.I still remember my Performa 476 (which was an LC 475 with 68LC040 processor) with MacOS 7.1P3, I believe, and two easier launchers, full of widgets. Neither really caught on, but now, we have Launchpad for the same thing. Apple doesn't really kill ideas, they just regurgitate them every few years.
I guess you weren't around when the Apple II was US$2495 or the original Mac or the Mac Portable was US$6495. Yes, it's just now that they're all about money.Absurd that a fully packed iMac 27inch 5K from 2017 isn't allowed to run this iteration of macOS where it is just a tiny incremental upgrade from the previous one. It makes clear that Apple is all about profit maximalization these days.
5k 27" iMac users have been left high and dry now there is no equivalent product for them to upgrade to. Yes, I know they could buy the Studio Display and add a Mini or Studio but I know several people who have now abandoned the upgrade route because they are confused by Apple's change of direction. They saw the iMac as a one-stop solution that was straightforward to implement. They see the new solution as applying to professionals or at least prosumers. Those 27" users also don't want to downgrade to a smaller 24" option which is also beginning to look neglected. Just to top things off the ideal of a 5K screen to achieve appropriate scaling leaves limited choice - Apple or Samsung with the LG option having received poor reviews. I'm not sure why Apple has done this or if there are any stats to show a decline in purchasing by older, more casual buyers.I guess you weren't around when the Apple II was US$2495 or the original Mac or the Mac Portable was US$6495. Yes, it's just now that they're all about money.
According to Wikipedia, the Apple II was 1298 USD (equivalent to 6576 USD today).I guess you weren't around when the Apple II was US$2495 or the original Mac or the Mac Portable was US$6495. Yes, it's just now that they're all about money.
It's not forced obsolescence because your iMac hasn't stopped working, and it is still going to get security updates.My 2017 iMac is running just fine but isn’t supported? Seems like forced obsoletion.
I know prices of Macs were always higher then the other brands but the thing is that nowadays the quality is deminishing and the support for it also. Back in the days the ratio Price:Quality was 50:50 now it is 90:10.I guess you weren't around when the Apple II was US$2495 or the original Mac or the Mac Portable was US$6495. Yes, it's just now that they're all about money.
But it is in a way, cause you don't get to run the latest OS. It gives at least the feel of obsolescence. And by the next iteration it will be.It's not forced obsolescence because your iMac hasn't stopped working, and it is still going to get security updates.
If you think the update is tiny and incremental then it isn't a big deal if you don't get it. You will still get security updates.Absurd that a fully packed iMac 27inch 5K from 2017 isn't allowed to run this iteration of macOS where it is just a tiny incremental upgrade from the previous one.
These days? Steve Jobs' Apple stopped supporting all PowerPC Macs pretty quickly. 2011 Lion was the last OS to support PowerPC, two years after 2009's Snow Leopard.It makes clear that Apple is all about profit maximalization these days.
You can still run all the apps and services and you will receive security updates for years now. Additionally, every year there is a big "Current OS on unsupported Macs" thread; Sonoma will be no different so you'll be able to run it on your iMac. May take a month or two, but since you don't think much of Sonoma it shouldn't be a big deal waiting.But it is in a way, cause you don't get to run the latest OS. It gives at least the feel of obsolescence. And by the next iteration it will be.
There were already useful third party widgets at the time and a whole dev kit for them. The AppStore is irrelevant. Widgets were not an idea of Tim Cook’s leadership….they were a Jobs thing. Either Apple failed to market them, or they were a stupid idea for a desktop OS. Widgets were essentially the visual model for the first iPhone apps. I think they were useful in prepping people for the iPhone app experience. Today it just seems stupid and out of place. I bet today they are being used in the opposite way. A tool to get people used to the next wave of either a more dumbed down macOS interface they want to push later….or for the headset UI. There is a reason and it’s not because Tim made them better.OR… they became useful instead of a near useless calendar or weather widget. This came under Tim Cook's leadership remember. As usual, things improve and get reinvented because of the App Store.