Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

With macOS 26.6 released, is Tahoe ready for mainstream use?

  • Yes — Things are running pretty smooth on my system(s), upgrading should be fine

    Votes: 45 57.0%
  • No — Based on my personal experience with Tahoe, there are still some issues, waiting is best

    Votes: 16 20.3%
  • No — Based on comments and feedback from others or things I have read, I am waiting longer

    Votes: 18 22.8%

  • Total voters
    79
  • This poll will close: .

PotentPeas

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
I'd like to try this poll after each minor macOS upgrade is released (X.1, X.2). I'm curious how community sentiment changes over time, and it could also help other users gauge the community consensus on whether upgrading at this time is a "good idea" or not.

The poll will remain open for 30 days. I'll post another one when macOS 27.0 drops. If Apple follows their typical release pattern, the release window for macOS 27.0 is mid/late September. (I will not post a poll for 26.6.1. If there is such a release, it will most likely include just a small number of targeted fixes and won't change the overall picture by much.)

Past polls:
macOS "Tahoe": 26.1 (37.5% yes); 26.2 (36.1% yes); 26.3 (37.4% yes); 26.4 (43.0% yes); 26.5 (61.1% yes)
(I'll put some kind of chart here when I have some more data.)

———

As someone who values stability and "things working right" more than access to the latest new features, it is reasonable to hold off from a major OS release until one believes that it will be a reasonably smooth experience.

With the initial Tahoe release, reading comments and posts from the community, I saw a lot of repeatedly noted issues. For example: Dock randomly going to autohide. Network printers not working. Rounded corners on PDFs. Large "hit box" for the green maximize button at the top of windows. To me, it really seems like Apple pushed Tahoe out to hit a self-imposed deadline, and it was still somewhat "beta" quality at launch; they did not wait for it to be adequately polished. ...However, these kinds of things seem to have been largely cleaned up and are largely addressed in 26.1, 26.2, and 26.3.

As attention has turned more to Golden Gate, Tahoe seems to be entering "maintenance mode" and is probably about as good as it is going to get. I upgraded with 26.5, and it has been fine for me. However, the recently-discovered ability to set the window corner radius has certainly been appreciated on my end.

I am interested in your take, after using macOS Tahoe 26.6 for a bit. Did they make any improvements that meaningfully fix or improve any issues you were experiencing with prior 26.X releases? Should a "regular" user upgrade yet? Is it "safe"? Or is it still not worth it, because of the bugs and UI jank?

Vote in the poll, and comment if you like!

Thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cape Dave
For me, it's not so much about reading bad reports on Tahoe, but rather how great Sequoia has been working for me the last year. If it's not broken, don't fix it. And except from Spotlight improvements and some other small changes, there is simply not much pulling me to try it.
 
I updated 15.7.5 to 26.5.2 early this month, and it has been fine. Just successfully updated to 26.6.0.

Everything is pretty-much the same since (esp. since I tamed the corner radii *smile*).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cape Dave
Has performance improved on older Macs? I'm on a 16" M1 Max. My Sequoia is pretty heavily modded by disabling AI and disabling many system/user services that I painstakingly tested I wouldn't need so I'm a bit worried. That plus I haven't done a "clean" install since 10 years ago when I first switched to Mac... just kept migrating the install.

I also think BetterDisplay lost the ability to natively increase XDR display SDR brightness with a Tahoe update a few months back. Not sure if a workaround has been found yet.
 
macOS 26 has been rock solid for me since the initial release. I clean installed it on day 1 and not had any trouble whatsoever across all my Macs.
 
I installed 26 yesterday and am still getting to grips with it. I did the corner radius fix (I probably wouldn't have installed it if that wasn't available) and installed volumeHUD right off the bat. The taller menu bar seems unnecessary, I find it difficult to track the active Safari tab now, and Mail is driving me nuts. I'm also finding navigation slower because a bunch of icons have changed (I don't even understand some of them, for example the icon for .iso files now has an arrow pointing down).

As for overall stability, it seems to have the same old bugs as 15 and apart from Mail I haven't yet noticed any new ones.
 
Has performance improved on older Macs? I'm on a 16" M1 Max. My Sequoia is pretty heavily modded by disabling AI and disabling many system/user services that I painstakingly tested I wouldn't need so I'm a bit worried.

I am on 16" M2 Max and I haven't noticed any performance difference from Sequoia. You can disable Apple Intelligence if you want, same as before. (Starting with Golden Gate, disabling it requires disabling Siri altogether.) I don't mess with disabling background services (…well, other than Adobe ones…) but I do use App Tamer to curb the CPU utilization of some background tasks (and also regular apps). I don't have any issue with it being hot/noisy, or with the battery lasting all day if I'm not doing anything intense.

(I don't even understand some of them, for example the icon for .iso files now has an arrow pointing down)

I think this is supposed to mean "installer".
Can't say anything about Mail or Safari, I've long been using Thunderbird/Firefox respectively.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Flyview
If you need to update for software reasons, I'd say go for it. I have a new Mac so I might be biased, but for me, it's running great now. The battery limit makes me not have to worry about charging "optimization," and LG has been tweaked enough for me to finally be able to live with it. I liked it to begin with, but it wasn't very legible and it hurt my eyes. Now it has a slightly frosted look so it is a nice blend between beauty (my opinion) and legibility.
 
I upgraded from Sequia solely as it's what immediately appeared after a TM restore following a logic board replacement.

Ive actually had no issues with it, but cannot comment on battery usage as my MBP is pretty much tethered to power using AlDente. It does run slightly warmer, the CPU and GPU cores appear to run temps ever so slightly higher (no fans).

I will be upgrading to macOS 27 when available though.

MBP 16" 2023 M2 Max
 
Why ruin a good thing by installing Tahoe? 🙂 You might just as well install Golden Gate, at least it looks better. 😉
Well, given how far we still are from GG release… if OP needs to update, now is a good time, and he can stay on 26.6 until GG matures and fixes all the initial bugs and memory leaks. So I think updating to 26.6 and then waiting to 27.2 or 27.3 to make the next upgrade is a good plan.
 
I routinely have weird issues with my parents' MacBooks on 26.5.2/26.6 that I don't have with my Mac Studio on 15.7.7.

For example:

- Menu Bar WiFi controls not syncing to Settings state properly
- Passwords app overlay getting stuck and needing to be killed in Terminal
- Menu Bar items moving around after updates and then vanishing behind the notch...

The real question is: does Sequoia do what you need to do reliably? If so, then keep it. If you are not able to do what you need on Sequoia, or you prefer the Tahoe UI, updating to Tahoe won't break anything major.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cape Dave
Tahoe 26.6 Finder is a bit slow. Example if I change a file name thats on an external SSD on the iMac M3, it takes several seconds to change or register. SSD is 1.5 TB free out of 2TB capacity. It's only happening with the 26.6 and 26.5... Sometimes it's right away, sometimes its several seconds delay.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.