Nice words, but nothing really changes today. Sequoia and Tahoe will still receive a few years of support, and Intel Macs will remain usable even longer.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
macOS Tahoe 26 on Unsupported Macs Discussion
- Thread starter jshayya0184
- WikiPost WikiPost
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
- Status
deeveedee
macrumors 68000
Agreed. I won't need macOS 27 until it is required for the newest XCode. That means that macOS 26 is still "the latest version" (for me) for almost another year.
5T33Z0
macrumors regular
Watching WDC now. They are talking about the sidebar, animations and app icons. LOL. you know, just the REALLY, REALLY, REALLY important stuff. 😀
macOS 27 will be Called "GoldenGate" first time I've heard them name it after a bridge?
that is 100% true! but it is sad seeing them kill off intel a little soon but at the end of the day, it was going to happen sooner than later.
More of a gate than a bridge in this case. A gate that an Intel Mac shall not pass through.
chrfr
macrumors G5
The Golden Gate Bridge spans the Golden Gate. "Golden Gate" isn't the bridge: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Gate
Oh wow, I had no idea as a European. The Golden Gate Bridge and strait must be an incredible sight to behold.
I actually never knew it was a strait. Sorry for any confusion on my part!
Nice one, Intel Macs don't support OS 27 so no point in making one imo as opencore legacy patcher won't support it
deeveedee
macrumors 68000
You are underestimating us. We'd still manage to discuss something in an "Unsupported macOS 27" thread. 🤣
You are underestimating us. We'd still manage to discuss something in an "Unsupported macOS 27" thread.
yep be 1000+ pages before you know it
5T33Z0
macrumors regular
To-dos:
Not-to-dos:
- Wait for macOS 27 to drop
- Wait for the shitstorms from average Mac users who were unaware they can't upgrade the OS
- Wait for the first listings of 2020 iMacs to hit eBay and local tech sale platforms
- Get a 2020 iMac on the cheap
- Install macOS on Wii/Wii U (if bored)
Not-to-dos:
- Wait for an OCLP update for Tahoe
- Get into discussions in "macOS on ARM – is it possible?"-type threads with people who cannot code but like to fantasize about porting OpenCore over to ARM to run macOS Big Sur+ on it.
deeveedee
macrumors 68000
Not ashamed to admit that I tried 🤣
Edit config.plist?
(Okay , okay it’s a joke lol)
MisterAndrew
macrumors 68030
macOS Golden Gate 27 on Unsupported Macs Discussion
I know y'all can make this happen. You did it for Snow Leopard. :)
forums.macrumors.com
You forgot the people on r/Opencorelegacypatcher that ask when will macOS 27 support come as if the developers of oclp are rebuilding the OS so that person installs 27
You also can't use the createinstallmedia tool on Intel... Here, Mr macintosh tried it and it errors out.
All 2020 Imacs must not be the same mine is 2020 with a i7 Intel Core processor, that supports T26 but will not support GG27.
Attachments
We have known this since last year. No 2020 imac will support OS 27. The first ever apple silicon iMac was from 2021.
I came to post this here, as I need some opinions on this.
let's Say OpenCore legacy patcher 3.0.0 released, but the twist here is:
Im saying this from What Educovas And Dhinakg told us in November/March:
Things to note:
Thank you For Any comments or opinions about this! I wanted to post this for some time but thought about it before deciding to post it!
let's Say OpenCore legacy patcher 3.0.0 released, but the twist here is:
- it Only Supports Macs from 2012-2017 ( Depends if T1 Support work is finished and ready)
- No Non-Metal Support
- No T2 Chip Support
- possibly no T1 Support if it's not Done?
Im saying this from What Educovas And Dhinakg told us in November/March:
- Non-Metal is un-useable in tahoe
- T2 Support is hard and will take time
- dhinakg Said T2 Chip support is well in an interesting state now
Things to note:
- I am not complaining that why is it not released yet ( Devs please Take your time don't rush!)
- I am asking for opinions on this as I've thought about it before.
- Again I am not asking for the Developers to Rush Development, if anything I heavily encourage them to Take their time to the fullest and not to listen to anyone that says "Release it Now please".
Thank you For Any comments or opinions about this! I wanted to post this for some time but thought about it before deciding to post it!
5T33Z0
macrumors regular
So DhinaK G is out as well:
Hello everyone, I've decided to share some of my thoughts about Tahoe
Developers keep leaving the project, and since June 30, 2025(and of course after closing donating), After showing screenshots with working graphics on some devices, we haven't heard or seen any further information about the development, except for the information that it has slowed down, ok
or maybe I missed something, although I've been following the topic closely. Its very long post so sorry))))
Yes, I know development is still ongoing, and every post asking "WHERE IS TAHOE?" or "WHY IS THERE NO SUPPORT?" puts additional pressure on the developers. However, I think there is a good idea worth considering: creating some kind of beta version of the patcher with working patches for a few supported devices so that people who really want Tahoe can at least get their hands on something.
I know every Tahoe update tends to break patches, but compatible system versions could simply be listed. After all, older Tahoe builds can still be downloaded from the Internet Archive. Some people will immediately say that this makes no sense because those versions would no longer receive security updates. On the other hand, I think people who specifically want Tahoe would understand and accept that tradeoff.
Releasing an early beta with the existing patch work would also be beneficial because other developers and enthusiasts could contribute improvements. Honestly, I find it hard to believe that there are no enthusiasts interested in helping refine the existing work or joining development efforts.
I understand that this is a controversial suggestion and that some people may see it as pressure. You are completely free to say, "If you want Tahoe so badly, make the patches yourself." However, I am simply suggesting that the developers release the work they already have for the system versions that currently function.
Of course, there should be no complaints from users because any early beta release would clearly be labeled as "use at your own risk," with a disclaimer stating that the developers are not responsible for any issues that may occur to the system or device.
At the very least, even an early beta with partial functionality would help calm many people's concerns regarding Intel Macs reaching the end of the road with the final Tahoe release. Additionally, making beta patches available could allow other enthusiasts to join development and contribute.
It has already been a year since Tahoe was released. This is not a post saying "COME ON, GIVE US THE PATCHES FASTER." It is simply a suggestion to release early patches—perhaps as a "developer beta" rather than something intended for everyday users. Of course, many regular users would still try to install Tahoe, but if they break their systems, they would know that what they installed was experimental software used entirely at their own risk and not intended to be stable.
I sincerely apologize if any part of this post comes across as pressure. I am very grateful to the developers for their work. This comment is simply a suggestion that I believe has probably been considered already. If it hasn't, perhaps it is worth discussing. If it has, I would be interested in hearing why it is considered a bad idea. I am simply curious whether I am the only one who has these thoughts about the current situation.
Developers keep leaving the project, and since June 30, 2025(and of course after closing donating), After showing screenshots with working graphics on some devices, we haven't heard or seen any further information about the development, except for the information that it has slowed down, ok
or maybe I missed something, although I've been following the topic closely. Its very long post so sorry))))
Yes, I know development is still ongoing, and every post asking "WHERE IS TAHOE?" or "WHY IS THERE NO SUPPORT?" puts additional pressure on the developers. However, I think there is a good idea worth considering: creating some kind of beta version of the patcher with working patches for a few supported devices so that people who really want Tahoe can at least get their hands on something.
I know every Tahoe update tends to break patches, but compatible system versions could simply be listed. After all, older Tahoe builds can still be downloaded from the Internet Archive. Some people will immediately say that this makes no sense because those versions would no longer receive security updates. On the other hand, I think people who specifically want Tahoe would understand and accept that tradeoff.
Releasing an early beta with the existing patch work would also be beneficial because other developers and enthusiasts could contribute improvements. Honestly, I find it hard to believe that there are no enthusiasts interested in helping refine the existing work or joining development efforts.
I understand that this is a controversial suggestion and that some people may see it as pressure. You are completely free to say, "If you want Tahoe so badly, make the patches yourself." However, I am simply suggesting that the developers release the work they already have for the system versions that currently function.
Of course, there should be no complaints from users because any early beta release would clearly be labeled as "use at your own risk," with a disclaimer stating that the developers are not responsible for any issues that may occur to the system or device.
At the very least, even an early beta with partial functionality would help calm many people's concerns regarding Intel Macs reaching the end of the road with the final Tahoe release. Additionally, making beta patches available could allow other enthusiasts to join development and contribute.
It has already been a year since Tahoe was released. This is not a post saying "COME ON, GIVE US THE PATCHES FASTER." It is simply a suggestion to release early patches—perhaps as a "developer beta" rather than something intended for everyday users. Of course, many regular users would still try to install Tahoe, but if they break their systems, they would know that what they installed was experimental software used entirely at their own risk and not intended to be stable.
I sincerely apologize if any part of this post comes across as pressure. I am very grateful to the developers for their work. This comment is simply a suggestion that I believe has probably been considered already. If it hasn't, perhaps it is worth discussing. If it has, I would be interested in hearing why it is considered a bad idea. I am simply curious whether I am the only one who has these thoughts about the current situation.
Last edited: