Lightning can stay. What they can do is only include a lightning to USB-C cable. It’s about time everyone upgrades to a notebook/PC with USB-C.
Why would anyone want a proprietary lightning port when there's an industry standard port that does the job just as well?
No, Lightning existed well before USB-C. USB-C is only about 3-4 years old. Also, Lightning used to be far superior to what Android phones could offer, because it was reversible, unlike microUSB. But now, there's absolutely no fathomable reason to stick with Lightning. We've grown up as a society, and most people want consistent cables across all their devices. USB-C all the things!Was anyone using USB-C when Apple started using lightning? (sincere question, can't remember).
If I was to wager, I would say that Apple regrets suing Lightning. Now they are trying to decide when to switch back. And wasn't there an article here recently talking about there finally being certified third party cables coming... boy would those companies be pissed if the switched back now.
Why would people want to stick with Lightning?
What's fragile is those cheap lightning cables apple gives you with a thousand dollar iphone......
I get what you were saying however when the vocal minority find distaste in a product that does influence general salesWould love to see the 900M iPhone users poll on if they care or even know about usb-c.
To be honest, as a techie and consumer, I don't get the allure of USB-C as a connector for iPhones.
- We've been using Lightning for years and numerous iPhone versions...so what's wrong with Lightning?
- What will USB-C on iPhone actually IMPROVE for the average consumer?
- What will USB-C on iPhone actually IMPROVE for the average techie?
- Every iOS device (except iPad Pro I think) transfers at USB 2.0 speeds. Those are the dark ages. It really drives me nuts when I want to transfer a few hundred 320K mp3 files to my iPhone and it takes 15+ minutes. In 2019. If USB-C connectivity promised USB 3.0 speeds with syncing to iTunes, that would be a positive in my book. But that's only 1 positive so far.
- Going back to #1, unless there is a compelling reason to change, it's just going to annoy consumers AGAIN that they have to toss all their expensive Lightning cables/plugs/accessories when they buy a new $1000 phone and REPLACE all those accessories with lots of cash. Honestly, this would be a very large part of my decision-making process and I'm sure a large percent of others, too. And no, I'm not buying a dozen $29 "adapters" for my various cars, wall outlets, charging ports, portable radios, etc.
Your points are most compelling, and the main reason to justify Apple’s decision to move to USB C-only on its notebooks (a forward-thinking decision that was criticized at the time but makes more and more sense). USB C is also the first industry standard cable that is reversible, supports all needs (data transfer, charging, video, audio, etc), is compact, and backwards compatible with older connector types. Apple can push the envelope on USB C that much more by moving to that cable type. They might want to include an adapter for USB A in the box to ease the transition though.1. It’s not reliable, Apple cables frey all the time, also not an industry standard. Cable companies have to pay apple to make the cables... for apple.
2. More buying options, can use friends android charger to charge your iPhone. Public charging stations will be all usb c in the future, so less likely the one you need isn’t broke.
3. All of 2 + no need to swap out cables when charging you Mac, iPad Pro, and iPhone. As a developer I plug in my test devices without chasing down a cable only to realize it’s to the wrong device(expecially helpful for developers that code both iOS and android
4. Apple would have incentive to allow faster transfer speeds as a reason for them upgrading (to appease the people mad at the switch, lot of uproar when switching from 30 pin to lightning, even though nobody would want to go back now)
5. When purchasing a $1000+ device I want it to be as compatible with other devices as possible and also not being stuck buying apple certified cables. I want cheap cables that are industry standard certified.
Yes it will suck to swap out all the current cables, my CarPlay setup I plugged into the back of my head unit and fiberglassed the lightning end into a custom phone holder. This will be at least a days worth of work to swap out, but will be worth it if it gives me the option to change out my phone in the future(most likely not)
Unlike when lightning cables first were introduced, so far as the post you made I have not seen one misspelled term - no lightening.A lot of people seem very confused about whether the current cable is "lighting", "lightening", or "lightning"...
That could be one advantage in favor of going to USB C!![]()
I’ve spent years REPLACING lighting cables, not collecting them. Lol. I’m ready to start REPLACING Apple USB-C cables now.
In, I think, 2009, Apple buckled to pressure from Greenpeace to remove PVC from their plastic cables. As a result of the lack of that ingredient, Apple cables deteriorate much more rapidly. Basically every other cable manufacturer out there uses PVC in their plastics, and that's why they don't fray like Apple cables. And this isn't just lightning cables; it's computer power cords and Apple TV cables as well (ever notice how those turn an ashy gray after a couple of years when they were black out of the box?). It's really a shame because when an Apple cable deteriorates and needs to be thrown away and replaced, it's not exactly "green," now is it Greenpeace?
And you really enjoy those cheap lightning connectors apples continues to use on the iphones...the lightning connector can break even easier than usb-c.....jeez
I can literally snap one right now and the lightning connector is guaranteed to snap first while the usb-c will be much more durable....
When the iphones get usb-c...you won't say a word.
I’ve spent years REPLACING lighting cables, not collecting them. Lol. I’m ready to start REPLACING Apple USB-C cables now.