Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Lightning can stay. What they can do is only include a lightning to USB-C cable. It’s about time everyone upgrades to a notebook/PC with USB-C.
 
Good! Glad to see MacRumors readers have some brains! USB-C is a necessity, Apple. We won't settle for less. We're sick of proprietary connectors that force us to buy additional cables for no good reason. USB-C is important because it has the potential to become the first true universal connector. Make it so! Bring it to iPhone!
 
Why would anyone want a proprietary lightning port when there's an industry standard port that does the job just as well?

Was anyone using USB-C when Apple started using lightning? (sincere question, can't remember).
If I was to wager, I would say that Apple regrets using Lightning. Now they are trying to decide when to switch back. And wasn't there an article here recently talking about there finally being certified third party cables coming... boy would those companies be pissed if the switched back now.
 
Last edited:
Was anyone using USB-C when Apple started using lightning? (sincere question, can't remember).
If I was to wager, I would say that Apple regrets suing Lightning. Now they are trying to decide when to switch back. And wasn't there an article here recently talking about there finally being certified third party cables coming... boy would those companies be pissed if the switched back now.
No, Lightning existed well before USB-C. USB-C is only about 3-4 years old. Also, Lightning used to be far superior to what Android phones could offer, because it was reversible, unlike microUSB. But now, there's absolutely no fathomable reason to stick with Lightning. We've grown up as a society, and most people want consistent cables across all their devices. USB-C all the things!
 
Why would people want to stick with Lightning?

Because 10+ devices that my family has are all lighting. This means 20+ lightning cables are laying around the house, cars, backpacks, work places etc.

Give me a single reason why I would want a new cable/port on a iOS device? How will that benefit my family and my day by day usage???
 
For me personally I don't really care as this point in time although I wouldn't be fussed if Apple went down the path of USB-C across all devices.
 
Last edited:
To be honest, as a techie and consumer, I don't get the allure of USB-C as a connector for iPhones.

  1. We've been using Lightning for years and numerous iPhone versions...so what's wrong with Lightning?
  2. What will USB-C on iPhone actually IMPROVE for the average consumer?
  3. What will USB-C on iPhone actually IMPROVE for the average techie?
  4. Every iOS device (except iPad Pro I think) transfers at USB 2.0 speeds. Those are the dark ages. It really drives me nuts when I want to transfer a few hundred 320K mp3 files to my iPhone and it takes 15+ minutes. In 2019. If USB-C connectivity promised USB 3.0 speeds with syncing to iTunes, that would be a positive in my book. But that's only 1 positive so far.
  5. Going back to #1, unless there is a compelling reason to change, it's just going to annoy consumers AGAIN that they have to toss all their expensive Lightning cables/plugs/accessories when they buy a new $1000 phone and REPLACE all those accessories with lots of cash. Honestly, this would be a very large part of my decision-making process and I'm sure a large percent of others, too. And no, I'm not buying a dozen $29 "adapters" for my various cars, wall outlets, charging ports, portable radios, etc.

1. It’s not reliable, Apple cables frey all the time, also not an industry standard. Cable companies have to pay apple to make the cables... for apple.
2. More buying options, can use friends android charger to charge your iPhone. Public charging stations will be all usb c in the future, so less likely the one you need isn’t broke.
3. All of 2 + no need to swap out cables when charging you Mac, iPad Pro, and iPhone. As a developer I plug in my test devices without chasing down a cable only to realize it’s to the wrong device(expecially helpful for developers that code both iOS and android
4. Apple would have incentive to allow faster transfer speeds as a reason for them upgrading (to appease the people mad at the switch, lot of uproar when switching from 30 pin to lightning, even though nobody would want to go back now)
5. When purchasing a $1000+ device I want it to be as compatible with other devices as possible and also not being stuck buying apple certified cables. I want cheap cables that are industry standard certified.

Yes it will suck to swap out all the current cables, my CarPlay setup I plugged into the back of my head unit and fiberglassed the lightning end into a custom phone holder. This will be at least a days worth of work to swap out, but will be worth it if it gives me the option to change out my phone in the future(most likely not)
 
The lightning cable was a strong inspiration for USB-C (multi-function, reversible etc). Apple was part of the group that designed USB-C, but we’re tired of waiting for that connector to hit the market. But as they were on the consortium, they certainly aren’t against it. However, I’m sure I read somewhere that Apple has stuck with lightning as the connector is smaller and, especially on the phones, the space is tight. On an iPad it’s less of an issue obviously. Now, having said all of that, it is harder over time for Apple to have credibility on moving to USB-C only on notebooks and it’s perceived advantages when their top selling product doesn’t ship with this out of the box. Would Apple instead move to USB C to lightning as the pack-in cable with the USB C charger to solve the connector size problem? Obviously the other benefits of USB C would be missed, such as fast data transfer, but I suspect that most people just use the cable for charging. Also, while the lightning connector is proprietary, Apple has been shipping phones with industry standard Qi since 2017. It’s anyones guess what Apple will do, but it is definitely possible that Apple may find a way to fit USB C into the next phones. Thickening the phones slightly would have other benefits. Historically Apple has avoided this, but this could be one rare occasion where Apple chooses to increase the thickness to accommodate things like USB C.
[doublepost=1549941227][/doublepost]
1. It’s not reliable, Apple cables frey all the time, also not an industry standard. Cable companies have to pay apple to make the cables... for apple.
2. More buying options, can use friends android charger to charge your iPhone. Public charging stations will be all usb c in the future, so less likely the one you need isn’t broke.
3. All of 2 + no need to swap out cables when charging you Mac, iPad Pro, and iPhone. As a developer I plug in my test devices without chasing down a cable only to realize it’s to the wrong device(expecially helpful for developers that code both iOS and android
4. Apple would have incentive to allow faster transfer speeds as a reason for them upgrading (to appease the people mad at the switch, lot of uproar when switching from 30 pin to lightning, even though nobody would want to go back now)
5. When purchasing a $1000+ device I want it to be as compatible with other devices as possible and also not being stuck buying apple certified cables. I want cheap cables that are industry standard certified.

Yes it will suck to swap out all the current cables, my CarPlay setup I plugged into the back of my head unit and fiberglassed the lightning end into a custom phone holder. This will be at least a days worth of work to swap out, but will be worth it if it gives me the option to change out my phone in the future(most likely not)
Your points are most compelling, and the main reason to justify Apple’s decision to move to USB C-only on its notebooks (a forward-thinking decision that was criticized at the time but makes more and more sense). USB C is also the first industry standard cable that is reversible, supports all needs (data transfer, charging, video, audio, etc), is compact, and backwards compatible with older connector types. Apple can push the envelope on USB C that much more by moving to that cable type. They might want to include an adapter for USB A in the box to ease the transition though.
 
Last edited:
A lot of people seem very confused about whether the current cable is "lighting", "lightening", or "lightning"...
That could be one advantage in favor of going to USB C! :)
Unlike when lightning cables first were introduced, so far as the post you made I have not seen one misspelled term - no lightening.
 
I refuse to have Twitter so Iiaa the polls, but I agree that USB-C would be a welcome addition. It would help in how many chargers I have to pack in my luggage. Outside of hotel radio docks I see no hardship for me if they convert.
 
Apple fans: "wireless is the future, it's about time to dump the headphone jack. Usb-c is the future, about time the MacBooks only have usb-c".

Also Apple fans: "pfft I don't care about USB-C, why move to the port of the future".
 
  • Like
Reactions: aaronhead14
I always assumed that the next port change for iPhone would be to remove all ports and rely on wireless alone.

Guess the only problem I see with this is cost of including a wireless charger in the box. There's no compelling reason to connect with a wire to anything at this point. Wireless technologies are fast enough, secure enough, and provide enough power to completely replace any port.
 
Lightning is a really well designed port physically. It’s rugged and reliable. Having said that it makes sense to switch. I’ve heard device makers say they refuse to use Lightning because Apple’s licensing is too invasive and onerous.

I just hope the USB-C port is as rugged. Micro-USB is woeful in that regard: the worst port ever invented.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ericwn
I’ve spent years REPLACING lighting cables, not collecting them. Lol. I’m ready to start REPLACING Apple USB-C cables now.

I have no idea what people do to cables. I have had dozens of devices always as a mobile user often with several "stops" a day and taken them all over the world and I have NEVER had even one cable fail. 30 pin, Lightning, Magsafe, Micro USB, whatever....
 
It would be cool if somehow Apple managed to create a truly *universal* port that accepted Lightning OR USB-C. But it would take up too much space inside.
 
In, I think, 2009, Apple buckled to pressure from Greenpeace to remove PVC from their plastic cables. As a result of the lack of that ingredient, Apple cables deteriorate much more rapidly. Basically every other cable manufacturer out there uses PVC in their plastics, and that's why they don't fray like Apple cables. And this isn't just lightning cables; it's computer power cords and Apple TV cables as well (ever notice how those turn an ashy gray after a couple of years when they were black out of the box?). It's really a shame because when an Apple cable deteriorates and needs to be thrown away and replaced, it's not exactly "green," now is it Greenpeace?

I really feel like a lot of Apple’s “commitment” to the environment is more marketing than reality anyway. I’m not gonna say they don’t do good things but some of their design decisions are downright hostile. Why upgrade an old Mac with an SSD when you can throw it away and get a new one?

They’re better than say... Amazon, but it’s more about checking boxes than actually caring.
 
Mac 128

1. You have lack of imagination. https://9to5mac.com/2018/11/07/ipad-pro-usb-c-accessories/ You can even connect a camera for tethering. What about SD card reader? a hub?

2. Do you even have proofs for that? How come you need to buy a lighting to USB-C and USB-C power adapter to charge iPad Pro for faster charging? You wont be able to charge faster with lighting port. The lighting port is outdated.

3. Gosh, the inner connector and pins are not protected. It doesnt have a cover like USB-C.

4. Your example does not mean everything lol. USB-C is widely accepted to replace USB-B and A type. Thunderbolt 3 is USB-C type.

Also, there are tons of accessories available. How come iPad Pro dropped lighting port then?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And you really enjoy those cheap lightning connectors apples continues to use on the iphones...the lightning connector can break even easier than usb-c.....jeez

I can literally snap one right now and the lightning connector is guaranteed to snap first while the usb-c will be much more durable....

When the iphones get usb-c...you won't say a word.

I've had one Lightning cable break at the connector, but it was a non-certified cable. That's why Apple has the MFi program... to ensure that certain standards are met. So I think your argument is weak. If you _choose_ to purchase non-MFi products, you get what you pay for.
[doublepost=1549947686][/doublepost]
I’ve spent years REPLACING lighting cables, not collecting them. Lol. I’m ready to start REPLACING Apple USB-C cables now.

Nice try. I suspect that you're not replacing these cables because of the connector, and that's what this article is about. You're right, though. Apple really needs to redesign their cables.
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonmet and RevTEG
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.