Those MBPs weren't symmetrical because they had a headphone jack on one side.same. I like 4x thunderbolt ports. more features and less crowded. the new M1 max is not symmetrical at all. looks very crowded.
Those MBPs weren't symmetrical because they had a headphone jack on one side.same. I like 4x thunderbolt ports. more features and less crowded. the new M1 max is not symmetrical at all. looks very crowded.
"in the future when electricity is just floating in the air"Its wireless between the phone and the charing pad. Even in the future when electricity is just floating in the air there would be a wire connecting your house the the power source. Your definition of wireless having zero wires isn't happening in your lifetime. Besides, having enough power to fast charge just in the air with you probably isn't healthy.
That's exactly my point. The "wireless" chargers aren't wireless.I fail to see how power can be drawn by the charging base/station/whatever without wires…
Even MagSafe on Mac has a wire that goes from the plug to the magnetic end.
Do you expect wall outlets to come with Qi charging bases as well?
I feel your pain. Magsafe fan here, but $2+ trillion dollar company I would have though could have satisfied everybody by bringing back Magsafe without losing a port...pretty sure I could have figured a way of doing it just by scribbling on the back of a fag packet with a pencil. But yeah this is Apple...
I'll take that SD slot over a fourth USB port because it means I don't have to get up and grab my iPad's SD reader from the drawer I keep it in when I want to download photos. Just pop the card in and I'm good to go. MagSafe and SD were the two things I had been waiting for Apple to bring back....We lost the fourth TB port to the idio… err people … who insisted we get HDMI and SD back. Those are taking up the data lanes the 4th TB port would have had.
Yes it does seem out of the norm for Apple but I can't think of any other reason why they would make the cable this way.Doesn't really sound like Apple's MO
If you look at the 24" iMac's cable; while it isn't detachable from the brick the colored part does not go all the way to the brick. I think Apple did it on purpose to color match against the white brick.Yes it does seem out of the norm for Apple but I can't think of any other reason why they would make the cable this way.
Who gives a ****? The ones who believe in Apple's "attention to details".Who actually gives a f... which colour a MagSafe cable has? Will those people buy a new MagSafe cable with their new MacBook, because the old cable has the wrong colour?
Yes - why bother to match the magsafe end colour but not the other end? (It looks particularly naff on the midnight cable...)Nice that they finally came out with matching cables, but can only be purchased separately? And what’s with the white USB-C connector?
Because it matches with the power brickYes - why bother to match the magsafe end colour but not the other end? (It looks particularly naff on the midnight cable...)
Please don't read my post from five minutes agoFor the second time in this thread, I'll state what to me was the beedin' obvious within 5 seconds of my seeing the new cables:
IT'S TO MATCH THE WHITE CHARGERS.
Coloured power bricks: Apple - you can have that suggestion for nothing!Because it matches with the power brick
I saw that comment… Let another vendor get caught up in the inventory glut of the chargers of undesirable colors… no one is looking at whats plugged into the wall down by the floor, more times than not. The cables themselves are visible anywhere the laptop or other devices are and has the cable plugged in, like stretching across a table, etc… it should be color matching the device its being plugged into… otherwise its tacky.Coloured power bricks: Apple - you can have that suggestion for nothing!
Yes - why bother to match the magsafe end colour but not the other end? (It looks particularly naff on the midnight cable...)
They did, but the cables aren't very colorful, not like the 24" iMacs.You would think that an article describing new color cables would use a color picture
I agree there is some color in the picture, but it seems like they purposefully decreased the saturation. The dull background also doesn't helpThey did, but the cables aren't very colorful, not like the 24" iMacs.
I want to see an iPhone that has a USB-C port right next to a Lightning port at the bottomWhile I assume you are joking, it illustrates how a company can keep a proprietary connector/charging system and still compl by having USB-C as well as proprietary (Magsafe3) ports that can charge.
Why have both ports? USB-C can do everything lightning does and more… just make USB-C the standard charge port for everything that needs charged… and let it even be the source port to connect MagSafe too… i don’t understand what the conflict is about this… oh wait, yes i do understand… its a revenue source to constantly be changing charging standards and the needed cables. At least the EU is doing something about the confusing mess…I want to see an iPhone that has a USB-C port right next to a Lightning port at the bottom
How do you reckon a MagSafe version of USB-C would work? The benefit of MagSafe is that it's power only so you can access all the USB-C ports for data while charging via MagSafe but you still have the ability for USB-C charging.Why have both ports? USB-C can do everything lightning does and more… just make USB-C the standard charge port for everything that needs charged… and let it even be the source port to connect MagSafe too…
Apple has been using Lightning for longer than the industry has been using USB-C, so how is Lightning an example of constantly changing standards to generate revenue? In the same length of time that Apple has had Lightning, the industry has charged via Mini-USB, Micro-USB, and USB-C so Apple isn the one with constantly changing standards.i don’t understand what the conflict is about this… oh wait, yes i do understand… its a revenue source to constantly be changing charging standards and the needed cables. At least the EU is doing something about the confusing mess…
They look beautiful I'm getting it!
Apple today made its USB-C to MagSafe 3 charging cable available to purchase separately in three new colors matching the MacBook Air, including space gray, midnight, and starlight, with pricing set at $49. Until now, the cable was only sold in silver.
![]()
Apple already includes a color-matched MagSafe 3 charging cable in the box with the new MacBook Air, but now the cable can be ordered individually from Apple's online store for those who want an extra one or need a replacement.
The cable is also compatible with the 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models released last year. This means that customers who purchased a new MacBook Pro in space gray will finally be able to get a matching space gray MagSafe 3 cable, as Apple somewhat surprisingly chose to bundle a silver cable with the space gray model.
MagSafe technology allows the cable to magnetically attach to a MacBook. If someone trips on the cable, it releases so that the MacBook does not go tumbling. The cable is two meters long and features a woven design for added durability.
The new MacBook Air is now available to order ahead of a July 15 launch. The notebook is powered by Apple's new M2 chip and has been redesigned with a slightly larger 13.6-inch display, a notch, and flatter edges. Pricing starts at $1,199, and the previous-generation MacBook Air with the M1 chip remains available for $999.
Article Link: MagSafe 3 Charging Cable Now Available in New Colors Matching MacBook Air
What do you plug the other side of the MagSafe into to energize the hockey puck? Thats the part i suggest should be USB-C. That would require the USB-C charger…How do you reckon a MagSafe version of USB-C would work? The benefit of MagSafe is that it's power only so you can access all the USB-C ports for data while charging via MagSafe but you still have the ability for USB-C charging.
Apple has been using Lightning for longer than the industry has been using USB-C, so how is Lightning an example of constantly changing standards to generate revenue? In the same length of time that Apple has had Lightning, the industry has charged via Mini-USB, Micro-USB, and USB-C so Apple isn the one with constantly changing standards.
If anything there are three or four different data bandwidths which all use the same USB-C plug (you can't look at a USB-C cable and tell if it is regular USB-C or TB-4), so its not like the EU is going to fix any confusing mess.