Johnny Rico said:One of the idealized purposes of government is to protect the people it governs from outside interference of their personal liberties. In reality most governments are in place to control their populations in order to provide an economic support base for the party in power.
In a perfect world it would be more illegal to prevent a person from doing as he or she chose, as long as their actions did not directly harm another person, than it would be for that person to take part in an activity like smoking marijuana.
In reality, we have a system of control in place that is designed to manufacture a population that thinks and acts in a certain way. This is acceptable only because of the vast numbers of people that exist in the world today. You can't give everyone in america free access to something like marijuana simply because of the sheer amount of 'alternative' thought that would occur. There has to be a working nonimaginative population striving toward a singular goal to provide a solid economic structure for the ruling party. With the legalisation of marijuana, and the subsequent increase in usage, there is a significant chance of severe destabilization of the fundamental building blocks of our society. Most people would realize that they are living massively pointless lives and just opt out. It would be like a massive plague, with whole nations of people dying in bed of demotivation or in their kitchens of food overdose.
Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
See! - Look at the violence inherent in the system.
Edit: I agree with (most of) the first two paragraphs. I just think people have a little more inteligence than you credit them with.