Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Johnny Rico said:
One of the idealized purposes of government is to protect the people it governs from outside interference of their personal liberties. In reality most governments are in place to control their populations in order to provide an economic support base for the party in power.
In a perfect world it would be more illegal to prevent a person from doing as he or she chose, as long as their actions did not directly harm another person, than it would be for that person to take part in an activity like smoking marijuana.
In reality, we have a system of control in place that is designed to manufacture a population that thinks and acts in a certain way. This is acceptable only because of the vast numbers of people that exist in the world today. You can't give everyone in america free access to something like marijuana simply because of the sheer amount of 'alternative' thought that would occur. There has to be a working nonimaginative population striving toward a singular goal to provide a solid economic structure for the ruling party. With the legalisation of marijuana, and the subsequent increase in usage, there is a significant chance of severe destabilization of the fundamental building blocks of our society. Most people would realize that they are living massively pointless lives and just opt out. It would be like a massive plague, with whole nations of people dying in bed of demotivation or in their kitchens of food overdose.

Help! Help! I'm being repressed!

See! - Look at the violence inherent in the system.

;)

Edit: I agree with (most of) the first two paragraphs. I just think people have a little more inteligence than you credit them with.
 
pseudobrit said:
You want a hard opinion? Your brother is an ******* and you're blaming weed.

Post hoc ergo propter hoc.

I'll bet money (theoretical money-- it is an untestable theory) if your brother never found pot he'd be a crackhead or a junkie or a drunk. Furthermore, he'd still be a deadbeat thief.

Pot doesn't turn people into raving *******s. But raving *******s who smoke pot might give you that idea.

Exactly what I wanted to say: a pure, logical fallacy. Conflating his innate behavior with a chemical he is fond of? We all use chemicals. Even the guy who runs 5 miles a day is using the endorphins his body naturally produces. When I go to work in the morning I almost always have coffee. Yeah I love coffee, but the crap at work hardly qualifies as coffee -- I'm using the chemical caffeine.

Pot doesn't affect behavior any more than taking cold medication does. If you've never smoked it, you're really quite unqualified to make any comments about it. I don't care who you know or what story you've heard or what you read in the paper.

Now, to be fair, I know people who smoked it day-in and day-out for years and then finally realized that it a negative thing in their life. But I don't think pot ever turned anyone into a criminal. Money, perhaps, makes criminals out of otherwise decent persons, but a plant? Please--

Furthermore, you are claiming that your brother's pot use is so evil that it caused YOU to punch somebody in the face and it caused your dad to start cursing in front of your kid sister. That sounds more like problems with you and your dad.
 
obeygiant said:
Pot isnt called the "cash crop" for nothing you know. And it does not grow like a "weed", the plants take a lot of care and nurturing to produce anything good. You cant just plant a seed and BOOM, weed. Futhermore, just because i like to smoke it doesnt mean i want to spend all my time growing it. If the government were let companies manufacture marijuana the profit will far exceed the tobacco industry.

rofl @ "There's no way to make money from Marijuana."

Its hard to grow because it requires lots of sun and everybody in this country is forced to grow it indoors. But in south america they grow all of it outside. It's mad easy.
 
everyone can argue the pros and cons of this drug, but here is something to think about.

The government COULD control the quality of bud, just like they can control the percetnage of alcohol in beer. They would also perfect the art of weed growing and only sell quality bud, which would put all weed dealers out of businesses because thier product wouldn;t be as quality as the mainstream product.

And for all you ******* who are throwing out family stories about weed ruining your life, shut up. Alcohol does the same, way worse. Weed is not physically addictive, its physcologically addictive, meaning the drug itself is NOT ADDICTIVE SO STOP SAYING IT.

Yes, it is mind altering, but it is also socially. sometimes not depending on the person. JUST LIKE ALCOHOL, it is a subjective drug, having selective effects on certian people, but also having alot of the same effects.
 
savar said:
Exactly what I wanted to say: a pure, logical fallacy. Conflating his innate behavior with a chemical he is fond of? We all use chemicals. Even the guy who runs 5 miles a day is using the endorphins his body naturally produces. When I go to work in the morning I almost always have coffee. Yeah I love coffee, but the crap at work hardly qualifies as coffee -- I'm using the chemical caffeine.

Pot doesn't affect behavior any more than taking cold medication does. If you've never smoked it, you're really quite unqualified to make any comments about it. I don't care who you know or what story you've heard or what you read in the paper.

Now, to be fair, I know people who smoked it day-in and day-out for years and then finally realized that it a negative thing in their life. But I don't think pot ever turned anyone into a criminal. Money, perhaps, makes criminals out of otherwise decent persons, but a plant? Please
Wow, sorry but that was the most illogical string of sentences I have read all day.

First of all, cold medicine DOES affect your behavior. Read the warnings on the back of a box.

The chemical argument makes no sense whatsoever. Water is a chemical. Ricin is a chemical. The latter kills you rather quickly.

I have never smoked pot but my uncle does and he is a criminal, and gone mentally. BTW, to argue that someone would be a criminal regardless of pot is besides the point. They need the money to buy more pot. Where do they get it if their too wasted to have a job? They knock over a 7-11.
Pot is scientifically proven to be a gateway drug to harder stuff, like meth and cocaine. Then you've got 15 year olds dying because their blood turned to jello.
 
cycocelica said:
And for all you ******* who are throwing out family stories about weed ruining your life, shut up. Alcohol does the same, way worse. Weed is not physically addictive, its physcologically addictive, meaning the drug itself is NOT ADDICTIVE SO STOP SAYING IT.

Do you feel good about yourself by attacking people with familial problems?

You seem to place drugs in a higher regard than those who suffer. How delightfully ironic, coming from someone who is defending the benignancy of marijuana.

but here is something to think about...

I don't believe there's much else to think or comment about your utterly moronic post.
 
Kingsly said:
Pot is scientifically proven to be a gateway drug to harder stuff, like meth and cocaine. Then you've got 15 year olds dying because their blood turned to jello.
Really, cause I know that all my friends and I are just itchin for some Arkansas crystal meth (apparently we got the good s***) after a bowl of marijuana :rolleyes:. Although there have been many reports of scientists claiming this is true, when it comes down to it, no scientific evidence supports this claim.

There is no way to say that marijuana was the cause of a person trying a second drug. Marijuana is the first drug most people try because it is hardly a hard drug and is usually the most common to obtain. Statistics have shown though that most marijuana users aren't on the harder drugs like you have specified. If that wasn't the cause, we would have at least 20 million people looking around for it, which is way below the estimated 1.5 million users of meth. I could have the same argument and say kids that drank milk or Dr. Pepper led them to marijuana and then so on.

jon
 
iJon said:
Really, cause I know that all my friends and I are just itchin for some Arkansas crystal meth (apparently we got the good s***) after a bowl of marijuana :rolleyes:. Although there have been many reports of scientists claiming this is true, when it comes down to it, no scientific evidence supports this claim.

There is no way to say that marijuana was the cause of a person trying a second drug. Marijuana is the first drug most people try because it is hardly a hard drug and is usually the most common to obtain. Statistics have shown though that most marijuana users aren't on the harder drugs like you have specified. If that wasn't the cause, we would have at least 20 million people looking around for it, which is way below the estimated 1.5 million users of meth. I could have the same argument and say kids that drank milk or Dr. Pepper led them to marijuana and then so on.

jon
AND think of the logic behind that. If a person is willing to do cocaine or heroin, then it's a pretty good bet that they've done pot since these drugs are so much harder. If they have no regard for the **** they're doing, then of course they'll have done the safer one at one point.
 
cycocelica said:
Everyone can argue the pros and cons of this drug, but here is something to think about...
Heres 2 pro I think everyone can agree on:

Person A has a stick up their @$$
Person A after marijuana: stick removed!

Person B is not very imaginative.
Person B after marijuana: can now do iTunes visualizer in their head!

Sounds fine to me! :D
 
aquajet said:
Do you feel good about yourself by attacking people with familial problems?

You seem to place drugs in a higher regard than those who suffer. How delightfully ironic, coming from someone who is defending the benignancy of marijuana.



I don't believe there's much else to think or comment about your utterly moronic post.

ok smartass lets actually look at what I said then think about it. When did I ever say I put drugs ina higher regard that those who suffer? never.

And on that discussion, I think those who suffer need to be treated and such to get better and recover, my arguement was simply that alcohol causes far worse negative results than pot. So before you reshape my words and ideas, pull your head out of your ass and read what I said.

I wasn't attacking families who have suffered, I was just making a point that everyone reacts differently. you made a good point though, good job.
 
anti-mairjuana activists can site as many scientific research documents as they want about marijuana being a "gateway" drug, but in all seriousness, the first time I smoked marijuana was out of a personal curiosity, I was also in Amsterdam at the time which was another key factor in the matter.
I found it to be a beautiful feeling, very relaxing and a whole bundle of fun.

Though you could say that was the first illegal drug I ever took, all other drugs were taken after weeks of preperation, planning and research. And all through curiosity and in the name of fun, not through a drug crazed hunt for some hard **** to cure raging urges to escape from real life and fry my brain .

Marijuana is a fun way to enhance an experience, taking it to, sometimes, surreal proportions.

The only person that marijuana affects is myself and, for me, not for all people, the positive far out weighs the negative effects of marijuana use.

For all those australians out there, I finished the VCE with a 91 enter score (of 100) while smoking, alot less in that year, but still having joints on weekends and such.

@Johnny Rico: Nice bong dude, The last one I had was a beautiful foot long triple chamber glassy with a tar catcher, where the glass would change colour due to light and heat.
 
Wow this thread is rapidly becoming an example of how quickly a simple discussion can become a full fledged flame war.

My 2¢: Anyone who is dependent on drugs (alcohol, cigs, pot, meth) to feel good about themselves/family/work/world or loosen up at a party is stupid and should see a therapist.

I am now leaving the discussion, have fun flaming people you don't even know and trying to convince them that [place discussion topic here] is good/bad.
 
Kingsly said:
I have never smoked pot but my uncle does and he is a criminal, and gone mentally. BTW, to argue that someone would be a criminal regardless of pot is besides the point. They need the money to buy more pot. Where do they get it if their too wasted to have a job? They knock over a 7-11.
Pot is scientifically proven to be a gateway drug to harder stuff, like meth and cocaine. Then you've got 15 year olds dying because their blood turned to jello.

Brilliant.:rolleyes:

The point is that just because someone smokes does not make them a dropout needing to rob your car stereo for a "fix".

You are succumbing to the rediculous pot fiend media stereotype.

I know many many professionals that smoke daily that contribute to society possibly more than a lot of non-smokers.

The bottom line here is that people should be allowed to do what they like, prohibition just doesn't work and costs govts that have to uphold these laws (not to mention the loss of potential taxes).

And to other posters with assertions that alcohol is fine in society don't wash with me. I have personal experience of two families wrecked by alcohol.
 
Kingsly said:
...Pot is scientifically proven to be a gateway drug to harder stuff, like meth and cocaine...
Show me the proof.

What proof do you have that someone who smokes pot will be lead to use cocaine? I have friends who smoke pot and the only other drug it has lead to has been tobacco.

That someone who chooses to try drugs might start with the most available/cheapest/'safest' option is hardly surprising and if you base scientific findings on that then you're some kind of idiot.

When people are killed by those who drive drunk you hear calls for drinking to be further controlled. Why? Surely it not the drink that killed it’s the car, so surely you need to ban cars not booze. People have been drinking for thousands of years but deaths by drink driving have only occurred in the last hundred or so since the car was invented. How’s that for scientific proof.
 
mpw said:
Show me the proof.

What proof do you have that someone who smokes pot will be lead to use cocaine?

When something of this sort does happen (and I'm sure it's not unheard of) it might have something to do with the fact that the some of the guys who sell weed offer other products.

So there's another nod for legalization and regulation – when's the last time you went to the liquor store only to be told they ran out of all the booze but howsabout a bump of coke instead?
 
What proof do you have that someone who smokes pot will be lead to use cocaine?

Reminds me of that Derek and Clive sketch.

Never open an umbrella in the house, it's very bad luck.

Yeah?

Yeah my grandfather did that in his youth and 53 years and 82 days later, he died.

Really

Walking on a stage wearing ridiculous clothing leads inexorably to chronic cocaine abuse. Look what happened to Kate Moss if you don't believe it.

Cocaine is just natures way of telling you, you have too much money
 
out of the 20 or so pot smokeing friends/people i know three of them are not boneafied crack heads and one of them died after driving his moped into a wall at 60mph stoned out of his head.
 
Hector said:
out of the 20 or so pot smokeing friends/people i know three of them are not boneafied crack heads and one of them died after driving his moped into a wall at 60mph stoned out of his head.
I know more than 20 people who smoke pot, none of them touch crack/cocaine/heroin and I know 3 people who've been killed on motocycles while sober and another who died in a car wreck while sober and had never touched any drugs at all.

Statistics are usless without shed loads of data to back them up.
 
Wow, I just love all the misconceptions about pot and whatnot. I don't think I ever had the urge to rob a store because I ran out of reefer. That is the funniest thing I've heard in ages...I'm crying I'm laughing so hard. Seriously, crying, hard. :D :D
 
cycocelica said:
I wasn't attacking families who have suffered...

No, I don't think so. You called people with familial problems "*******" and suggested they should "shut up." Is that not a personal attack?

And on that discussion, I think those who suffer need to be treated and such to get better and recover...

Are you now retracting your previous statement?
 
Hector said:
out of the 20 or so pot smokeing friends/people i know three of them are not boneafied crack heads
So are you saying from your observation that 85% of "potheads" will be or are crackheads?

jon
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.