Ok I am looking to buy a mbp but i dont know which one to get. Im looking at the 1,699.00 15" and the 1,499.00 13" Is there any difference between the two other than size and price? please and thanks
alright thanks. will both be able to play games like sims 3 or spore?
Ok I am looking to buy a mbp but i dont know which one to get. Im looking at the 1,699.00 15" and the 1,499.00 13" Is there any difference between the two other than size and price? please and thanks
The only thing I gather from your signature is that you must be very very dense. Not only is that claim completely lacking of any common sense, but the sheer fact that you think that 2in bigger make a world of difference and you opted for the 15" over the 17" sheds light to how mind-numbingly stupid you are.
So, on topic, OP. The computers are the basically the same. My advice would be to buy the one that better fits your needs of portability. Do you, like me, carry around your laptop everyday to a variety of different places (i.e. between classes at uni and to and from my apartment) or do you move it to only a couple places throughout the day.
Both will probably do, but the 13" is very comfortable to lug around.
the 2" is a world of difference in some situations....although when surfing web pages it doesn't make much of a difference with most pages. However, you can definitely see more text on word or email docs, it is nice to have the itunes mini-controller open all the time and on the side or to put two docs side by side to compare or move text, pics, etc. The 17 is way too cumbersome for my uses and most everyones uses- along with the fact the cost is prohibitive for most.The only thing I gather from your signature is that you must be very very dense. Not only is that claim completely lacking of any common sense, but the sheer fact that you think that 2in bigger make a world of difference and you opted for the 15" over the 17" sheds light to how mind-numbingly stupid you are.
First, calling shambo stupid and saying they are dense for what they wrote is not really necessary!!
I happen to agree 1000% with shambo's comments- and I happen to be someone who makes choices and comments 1000% from common sense! (family trait which gets me into trouble with the wife!)
Anyway, the 2" is a world of difference in some situations....although when surfing web pages it doesn't make much of a difference with most pages. However, you can definitely see more text on word or email docs, it is nice to have the itunes mini-controller open all the time and on the side or to put two docs side by side to compare or move text, pics, etc. The 17 is way too cumbersome for my uses and most everyones uses- along with the fact the cost is prohibitive for most.
See my sig.
MBP 15" has more speakers than the 13" too. And there are NO speaker grills on the 13", so the sound won't come out as strong regardless.
First, calling shambo stupid and saying they are dense for what they wrote is not really necessary!!
I happen to agree 1000% with shambo's comments- and I happen to be someone who makes choices and comments 1000% from common sense! (family trait which gets me into trouble with the wife!)
Anyway, the 2" is a world of difference in some situations....although when surfing web pages it doesn't make much of a difference with most pages. However, you can definitely see more text on word or email docs, it is nice to have the itunes mini-controller open all the time and on the side or to put two docs side by side to compare or move text, pics, etc. The 17 is way too cumbersome for my uses and most everyones uses- along with the fact the cost is prohibitive for most.
First, calling shambo stupid and saying they are dense for what they wrote is not really necessary!!
I happen to be someone who makes choices and comments 1000% from common sense! (family trait which gets me into trouble with the wife!)
Well, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and think that you're not like shambo, who is unable to have a rational conversation regarding the 13" MBP.
Maybe you can explain to me how common sense dictates that choosing a 15" is future-proofing your "investment"? And how can shambo's comment about the 17" being to "chunky and clumsy" (heh, probably the worst description anyone could ever come up with for a current Mac) not be applied when comparing the 15 to the 13? Wouldn't it be smarter to choose a computer based on your needs, like I described, as opposed to choosing because it has 2" more of screen, like shambo suggests?
Well I must admit that reading shambo's way of arguing here on MR, the word "stupid" has also crossed my mind a couple of times!
Common sense eh? Some would say that it would be common sense to choose computer from your needs, don't you think? Some might say, using their common sense, that if you only need a 13" then it would be rather stupid to pay for a 15"!
The only thing I gather from your signature is that you must be very very dense. Not only is that claim completely lacking of any common sense, but the sheer fact that you think that 2in bigger make a world of difference and you opted for the 15" over the 17" sheds light to how mind-numbingly stupid you are.
So, on topic, OP. The computers are the basically the same. My advice would be to buy the one that better fits your needs of portability. Do you, like me, carry around your laptop everyday to a variety of different places (i.e. between classes at uni and to and from my apartment) or do you move it to only a couple places throughout the day.
Both will probably do, but the 13" is very comfortable to lug around.
I don't know Shambo's comments on MR as a whole
Sorry, I thought that you meant that you agreed to his comments as a whole, regarding the 13" vs 15"! I believe he has made a couple of threads about it!