Right now, Apple could really use McLaren's innovation and attention to detail.
Attention to detail? McLaren automobiles are notorious for poor quality and mediocre resale value. This is well-documented.
Right now, Apple could really use McLaren's innovation and attention to detail.
...
I've been a Mac user since the early 90s and if Windows wasn't such a pos, I'd be looking seriously at jumping ship.
Windows 10 is not bad at all. Especially when talking about viruses and other stuff. The only Windows machines I would buy are the MS made ones like the surface though.I feel the same way. The only way Windows can compete with macOS is abandon its Registry based virus heaven legacy foundation and completely re-design a new Unix based OS from ground up. Are they "courageous" enough to do it? I doubt it very much.
Gotta agree, Ive (or whoever is in charge of Industrial Design right now) is forgetting the essentials, such as honest design (The new MacBook Pro speakers anyone?) and the obsession with form over function and unergonomic products is not my cup of tea.Wrong target. It's Ive that's doing the damage. When I see a laptop where everything is soldered to the motherboard, including AFAICT, the touch ID, I conclude function has gone bye-byes. A computer where any damage to what effectively is the 'On' switch needs a new motherboard including the SSD, is design gone mad.
I've been a Mac user since the early 90s and if Windows wasn't such a pos, I'd be looking seriously at jumping ship.
I feel the same way. The only way Windows can compete with macOS is abandon its Registry based virus heaven legacy foundation and completely re-design a new Unix based OS from ground up. Are they "courageous" enough to do it? I doubt it very much.
Attention to detail? McLaren automobiles are notorious for poor quality and mediocre resale value. This is well-documented.
I hardly consider the two of them sitting down and chatting as confirming they were in discussions of a take over or large investment Mac Rumors.....
I said hello to the till lady today in the supermarket... translated by MacRumors... I proposed to the till lady today...
Citation?
The two happiest days of a McLaren owner...Ferraris and Porsches don't depreciate at the same level as McLarens.
If Apple takes over McLaren, will McLaren be renamed MacLaren?
If they make a Formula 1 car, they can call it the MacLaren Pro.
If they make a street-legal car for consumers, they can call it the iMacLaren.
If they make a small roadster, they can call it the MacLaren Mini.
The last thing I wanted to hear was Jony justifying his design choices for a supercar.
Makes sense. Apple is too cheap to pay what another company is worth and has absolutely no direction on future innovation. Now they went from building a car, which was relatively stupid, to making systems that no vehicle manufacturer will want. Why would vehicle manufacturers want anything from Apple when they develop their own semi-autonomoues technologies in-house or get them from Mobileye? Even Tesla rolled its own solution into production vehicles in less than a year... Apple has been chewing on this for how long? Idiots.
After $20 billion in R&D, Apple will announce something stupid that nobody wants. And Tim Cook will talk about all the great products in the pipeline. Unfortunately, by the time anything they are "working on" is ready, iPhone and iPad sales will be tanking while other companies, like Google, innovate with actually desirable phones like the Pixel. Nobody will want a car that integrates seamlessly into the iOS ecosystem by 2020. Look at the sales trajectory of Apple's mobile products: DOWN.
Tim Cook's days are numbered, that is, if the Board of Directors is paying any attention to what's not happening in Cupertino: Innovation. Cook has not structured the company in a way that promotes innovation, clearly evident by the lack of any attention being paid to its UI and product lines. Phil Schiller keeps getting fatter as he pumps out useless products nobody wants.
This is a very sad time for Apple.
Makes sense. Apple is too cheap to pay what another company is worth and has absolutely no direction on future innovation. Now they went from building a car, which was relatively stupid, to making systems that no vehicle manufacturer will want. Why would vehicle manufacturers want anything from Apple when they develop their own semi-autonomoues technologies in-house or get them from Mobileye? Even Tesla rolled its own solution into production vehicles in less than a year... Apple has been chewing on this for how long? Idiots.
After $20 billion in R&D, Apple will announce something stupid that nobody wants. And Tim Cook will talk about all the great products in the pipeline. Unfortunately, by the time anything they are "working on" is ready, iPhone and iPad sales will be tanking while other companies, like Google, innovate with actually desirable phones like the Pixel. Nobody will want a car that integrates seamlessly into the iOS ecosystem by 2020. Look at the sales trajectory of Apple's mobile products: DOWN.
Tim Cook's days are numbered, that is, if the Board of Directors is paying any attention to what's not happening in Cupertino: Innovation. Cook has not structured the company in a way that promotes innovation, clearly evident by the lack of any attention being paid to its UI and product lines. Phil Schiller keeps getting fatter as he pumps out useless products nobody wants.
This is a very sad time for Apple.
Makes sense. Apple is too cheap to pay what another company is worth and has absolutely no direction on future innovation. Now they went from building a car, which was relatively stupid, to making systems that no vehicle manufacturer will want. Why would vehicle manufacturers want anything from Apple when they develop their own semi-autonomoues technologies in-house or get them from Mobileye? Even Tesla rolled its own solution into production vehicles in less than a year... Apple has been chewing on this for how long? Idiots.
After $20 billion in R&D, Apple will announce something stupid that nobody wants. And Tim Cook will talk about all the great products in the pipeline. Unfortunately, by the time anything they are "working on" is ready, iPhone and iPad sales will be tanking while other companies, like Google, innovate with actually desirable phones like the Pixel. Nobody will want a car that integrates seamlessly into the iOS ecosystem by 2020. Look at the sales trajectory of Apple's mobile products: DOWN.
Tim Cook's days are numbered, that is, if the Board of Directors is paying any attention to what's not happening in Cupertino: Innovation. Cook has not structured the company in a way that promotes innovation, clearly evident by the lack of any attention being paid to its UI and product lines. Phil Schiller keeps getting fatter as he pumps out useless products nobody wants.
This is a very sad time for Apple.
Makes sense. Apple is too cheap to pay what another company is worth and has absolutely no direction on future innovation. Now they went from building a car, which was relatively stupid, to making systems that no vehicle manufacturer will want. Why would vehicle manufacturers want anything from Apple when they develop their own semi-autonomoues technologies in-house or get them from Mobileye? Even Tesla rolled its own solution into production vehicles in less than a year... Apple has been chewing on this for how long? Idiots.
After $20 billion in R&D, Apple will announce something stupid that nobody wants. And Tim Cook will talk about all the great products in the pipeline. Unfortunately, by the time anything they are "working on" is ready, iPhone and iPad sales will be tanking while other companies, like Google, innovate with actually desirable phones like the Pixel. Nobody will want a car that integrates seamlessly into the iOS ecosystem by 2020. Look at the sales trajectory of Apple's mobile products: DOWN.
Tim Cook's days are numbered, that is, if the Board of Directors is paying any attention to what's not happening in Cupertino: Innovation. Cook has not structured the company in a way that promotes innovation, clearly evident by the lack of any attention being paid to its UI and product lines. Phil Schiller keeps getting fatter as he pumps out useless products nobody wants.
This is a very sad time for Apple.
You'll be here all week I'm sure.If Apple takes over McLaren, will McLaren be renamed MacLaren?
If they make a Formula 1 car, they can call it the MacLaren Pro.
If they make a street-legal car for consumers, they can call it the iMacLaren.
If they make a small roadster, they can call it the MacLaren Mini.