The "consequences" are meaningless since they'll be out of business within a year.no one will use this system.
I'm an apple fan but lol yea right
The "consequences" are meaningless since they'll be out of business within a year.no one will use this system.
Only for in-app purchases.Where do I even begin with the spin this guy is spewing?
1) Starbucks. They are going to also offer ApplePay by end of year.
Actually, you can set up auto-reload from a credit card or Paypal (which may be linked to a checking account).And the only payment linked to the app is pre-filled gift cards. The potential loss is night and day compared to a bank account. Hackers would have already killed Starbucks if it were.
See, if this was actually true, it would be about the only thing that they could say that would make me willing to cut them some slack. (Not much, but some.)
But if they're all about anonymizing customers and allowing them the option of privacy, why did you not even mention that until today, and why has such an option not existed in the trial rollout?
Maybe because one of the two basic purposes of the entire system is to provide even better customer data to the retail giants.
Always will be. MCX,pay, google pay etc. Please..
Cash is king no matter what. And nobody cares where one will shop or not!
![]()
...but not all of it. The phone, including some customized darned-near-tamper-proof hardware, keeps the core of the tokenization system processing OUT of the cloud.
----------
I don't want perks. I want convenience in a system that works.
I'm an apple fan but lol yea right
The tokenization systems used by Apple Pay (run by Mastercard, Visa or another processor) are also running in the cloud ...
Not sure what you mean by the "core". With Apple Pay, the tokens and the keys used to generate the one-time security codes are delivered from the "cloud" to the device via the Internet when you register the card in Passbook. The token verification by the merchant at the time of transaction also uses the "cloud" via the Internet. The only difference from CurrentC (assuming the CEO's explanation is accurate) is that Apple stores the token and key in the Secure Element on the device, while CurrentC doesn't store it on the device but delivers it "on demand" at the time of the transaction. If you assume that the payment processor is hacked, you are screwed in any case....but not all of it. The phone, including some customized darned-near-tamper-proof hardware, keeps the core of the tokenization system processing OUT of the cloud.
From what I understand, CurrentC transactions will not be processed by the retailers, but by MCX (the company). Whether they are more or less trustworthy than a bank or payment processor, I don't know. I do know though that both banks and payment processors have been hacked in the past.Which has better security generally? Banks and payment processors or retailers?
BINGO.
CEO keeps touting the fact that this is 3 years in the making.
Which means during the past 3 years NFC payments worked concurrently (mostly Google wallet) despite these merchants having signed exclusivity agreements.
Why then shut it off so precariously immediately after ApplePay launches, this banning it AND Google Wallet?
It's this precise action that is tarnishing the image of MCX. Leaves a bad taste in consumers mouths.
(Doesn't help also that FAR TOO MANY of these MCX merchants have been hacked recently, including MCX itself just last week)
Always will be. MCX,pay, google pay etc. Please..
Cash is king no matter what. And nobody cares where one will shop or not!
![]()
Banks are liable for unauthorized ACH debits to a certain degree under the Electronic Funds Transfer Act (which also regulates debit card payments). However, the protections are less customer-friendly than those of credit cards (which is one of the things paid for by the credit card transaction fees). It will be interesting to see if MCX offers any kind of additional liability protection. Personally, I only use credit cards for payment whenever possible ...who take the liability ? the merchant, pretty sure not the bank
QR codes are, as others have noted, dead. Their system was conceived back when some people thought QR codes were going to change the world, but they never took off and trying to bring them back is foolish at best, especially for a payment system. The fact that Apple has made, for those with a 6 or 6+, so absolutely easy to use Apple Pay, it's going make all other systems seem cumbersome and not worth the effort.
I know I'm making a pretty big claim, but I would bet that in 6 months, if we come back to review how things play out, it's likely that CurrentC will be a failed attempt and the retailers who bought into the scheme will have moved on and won't be looking back.
To a certain degree. How swell. I'll stick with my 100% guarantee from Amex and Chase, thanks.Banks are liable for unauthorized ACH debits to a certain degree .
It will be interesting to see if MCX offers any kind of additional liability protection.[/
QUOTE]
It will be even more interesting to watch if ANY consumers give these guys the benefit of the doubt that their funds and identities are secure.
This is hilarious, really. The guy keeps saying "Like with Apple..." Yet their product has been in development for several years and won't even be rolled out widely until next year. Big mistake taking all of the key selling points of your product and comparing them to something Apple already has available but YOU have blocked.
Just imagine a political candidate that no one likes saying they're "just like" the candidate everyone does like, then why should we vote for you???
If Apple could better integrate Apple Pay w/ rewards cards in passbook it's game over.