Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Which is why you would not buy this iMac. This is clearly intended for Apple to enter emerging markets with. You will get your retina super option iMac soon enough I suspect.

Ok, I agree, but the pricing is all wrong then. You can't emerge **** with 1099 price tag.
 
The problem is that the performance and parts justify a price of $599, not $1099.

apple isn't a performance parts slop shop. it is the price of entry into the ecosystem you are paying for. the Apple tax so to speak is very much alive and well, and it is actually quite reasonable considering the software and services it entitles you to.

----------

Ok, I agree, but the pricing is all wrong then. You can't emerge **** with 1099 price tag.

you can when there is not a cheaper option in their ecosystem. for people who have always wanted a mac desktop this is their nearest star.
 
Apple = you can't upgrade that

Give us your $$$$$

Somehow they've made IBM's original approach (1980) finally work. Make it proprietary and force them to buy new when then want to expand.

STUPID.
 
So lame. I Hate that they make it just about impossible to upgrade the HD in the iMac and charge a ridiculous premium on the initial upgrade. Now restricting memory? Maybe people can't afford the upfront cost and want to upgrade over time.... just lame...
I agree mostly; however, Apple's memory upgrades have come down significantly over time making it nearly as affordable to BTO as it would be to upgrade nearly right away.
Consumers don't want upgradeable parts. They don't care. This is a sensible move from Apple and I support it 100%.
This is a non-sensical assumption. SOME consumers may not care about upgradable parts when they're buying, but mark my word, 2 years from now when Apple releases an OS that calls for double the RAM or when the OS becomes unstable because the RAM is insufficient, I assure you the visit to the Genius Bar is most certainly going to end with some severe disappointment. The computer should function well for more than 2 years if you ask me. My PowerBook at 5 years old did until I handed it down. My MP is doing fine at nearly 6 years old and my Mac Mini is at 5 years old. So I find your statement to be an absolute generalization based on zero fact.

Then don't buy it. Clearly it's not for you. 99% of people don't care. They use facebook. They don't need a super computer.

Man you elitest think Apple only releases products thinking about you. This is for the general public.

If you want something super awesome get a mac pro. :apple:

First, I saw nothing elitist about the comment made. I disagree that the vast majority of the target audience for this iMac would not care about upgrading. My own mother bought what was more than enough computer at the time but has come to find with operating system updates that she is in need of more memory. Are you here to tell me that this computer should be tossed after 2 years when Apple has handed out a couple OS updates because the memory is insufficient? Do you really think that Apple will ensure 2 years from now that their OS will be usable on a 2-year old machine? I think that if I am buying a computer, especially a Mac, that it will last me a bit longer than 2 years. In fact, I intend for it to outlast an extended Apple Care warranty.

At the very least, when buying a machine I would like to know I can do two things; upgrade the memory if needed at a later date and upgrade or replace the hard drive in case of failure or need for more capacity.
 
Apple needs to stop thinking all of its customer base are stupid.

I don't think it's Apple thinking its base is stupid...it's them thinking in this instance that they just don't care.

I had a 2011 iMac in my studio for light Pro Tools work, light video editing, checking email, word docs, creating CD's and listening to Pandora. It had 4 gigs of ram (upgradable to 16). I pushed that machine more than an average user and never once felt the need to upgrade ram. 8 gigs is plenty for a basic user.

As for the price, this is Apple..so their basic machines are always pricier than Windows PC's. My wife would be very happy with this one for a long time. She doesn't even know what ram is or how it would affect her anyway.
 
A lot of people do resource-intensive tasks on a Mac, much more than you may think. Indeed, a lot of people buy a Mac over a Windows machine primarily for video-editing, running virtual machines and graphic design. Mac consumers don't want to pay the ridiculous prices that Apple charge for an extra 4GB of memory or 250GB of storage space when the parts itself cost a fraction of the price they are charging. The option to have user-upgradeability is something which extends the life of a product and gives consumers the peace of mind that they won't have to shell out for a whole new machine should their needs change or make a decision now as to how they see themselves using the product in a few months/years time.

And like you said, should the RAM fail, the whole logic board will need replacing and that isn't cheap, especially if you're out of warranty.

I have an rMBP with 16 gig and because the OS has poor memory management I find myself having to reboot. I sure would like more memory, but I cant get it.

I cant imagine how bad it is for the 4GB folks.
 
SOME consumers may not care about upgradable parts when they're buying, but mark my word, 2 years from now when Apple releases an OS that calls for double the RAM or when the OS becomes unstable because the RAM is insufficient, I assure you the visit to the Genius Bar is most certainly going to end with some severe disappointment.

mark my word that visit will end with a smile on a face and a new computer in hand. most people who don't like to get their hands dirty opening up things they have no interest in opening are also perfectly happy getting the latest and greatest. my mom does it every couple years and to her this is what makes shopping so great. the clever ones will even manage to pass their 2 year old model along to someone even less concerned on ebay and get at least half of what they paid for the new computer back. win win.

these people can actually teach us all a lesson... sometimes it is better to resell your old tech after 2 years and get half back then to wait 4, spend even more on interim upgrades and then get nothing.
 
Yep exactly it helps Apple drive down costs (which is important in the case of this cheaper iMac especially) and helps them build slimmer products that are more desirable.

Cheap memory still fails a lot and is unreliable which is a good reason for preventing people from using it. And luckily Apple doesn't put cheap memory in their machines and I've never seen a Mac with Apple supplied RAM fail in this way (although I'm sure it could happen occasionally). We can debate whether it's the best or not, but it's certainly not the cheapest or lowest quality memory they could use to maximise profits.

Ive had computers since 1979 and never had memory fail. Maybe I'm luck or maybe failures are few and far between.
 
i think the more important thing in this photo is the fact there using BR2032 batteries now instead of CR2032.....what an upgrade.
 
Ive had computers since 1979 and never had memory fail. Maybe I'm luck or maybe failures are few and far between.

i am actually continually shocked by how error free computing is considering it is adding together numbers faster then the time it takes the light leaving your monitor to reach your eyes.
 
External RAM?

Maybe they plan to mess around with external ram through "thunderbolt?"

helios_e2_ports.jpg

*Example*
 
You're right, we're not the norm, but this isn't the 80s any more, more people have basic knowledge about computers than ever before. Apple needs to stop thinking all of its customer base are stupid.

Then again, it's kinda well known that those who like to tinker get PC and Android.

I’m afraid that’s because for the most part we are stupid.
They make something shiny and over priced, and we buy it, (in droves).
They make something technologically crippled and over priced, and we buy it, (in droves).
They make something proprietary and over priced, and we buy it, (in droves).
We like how it looks and will always find a reason to defend their decisions instead of voting with our wallets. The worst part - in some cases we don’t even try the competition before discounting it.

Windows 8 is a nice enough OS, as the hardware is equally nice, (which it won’t as M$ aren’t into hardwarwe like that), I’m off. Right now Apple meets my needs it’s just a shame they rip me off for the privilege.
 
it is actually quite reasonable considering the software and services it entitles you to.

As someone who has probably owned Apple longer than you've been alive, all I can say is that I hope you enjoy the kool-aid. It's a an absurdly overpriced machine for what it offers, and is a sadly cynical money grab.

Is this "insanely great?" No, just insanely and insultingly priced.
 
i am actually continually shocked by how error free computing is considering it is adding together numbers faster then the time it takes the light leaving your monitor to reach your eyes.

I have had sticks, (only one though), fail on my Mac Pro. Could you imagine the repair cost if that was soldered…!!!
 
As someone who has probably owned Apple longer than you've been alive, all I can say is that I hope you enjoy the kool-aid. It's a an absurdly overpriced machine for what it offers, and is a sadly cynical money grab.

Is this "insanely great?" No, just insanely and insultingly priced.

but money it will grab....tons of it.
 
I can see why from Apple's standpoint they can't make this $899. They want to give off the impression that they are a premium brand. The innards of this imac are really the same innards of a "crappy" < $1000 Dell or HP box. Pricing it like that would acknowledge that no, there's nothing premium about this imac, it's using 3 to 4 year old technology. And judging from the likes of dumastudetto or most of AI, this psychology works like a charm.
 
Can anyone who is complaining tell me why the average user needs more than 8GB RAM? The average user isn't using Photoshop for billboard-sized images, multiple VMs, solving computational fluid dynamics, or running a ZFS server.

This is a consumer grade machine. It will do just fine with 8GB RAM.
 
An 8GB iMac is suddenly obosolete trash but their biggest seller is the 4GB Air? I'm a little confused.
 
I can see why from Apple's standpoint they can't make this $899. They want to give off the impression that they are a premium brand. The innards of this imac are really the same innards of a "crappy" < $1000 Dell or HP box. Pricing it like that would acknowledge that no, there's nothing premium about this imac, it's using 3 to 4 year old technology. And judging from the likes of dumastudetto or most of AI, this psychology works like a charm.

Who wouldn't want to spend the extra $100 for the iMac over something like this:

YA5FRuX.png
 
As someone who has probably owned Apple longer than you've been alive, all I can say is that I hope you enjoy the kool-aid. It's a an absurdly overpriced machine for what it offers, and is a sadly cynical money grab.

Is this "insanely great?" No, just insanely and insultingly priced.

you must be an old fart... i am 45 and i am pretty sure apple wasn't even a company when I was born. my first computer was a Tandy Model II with tape drive.

----------

I have had sticks, (only one though), fail on my Mac Pro. Could you imagine the repair cost if that was soldered…!!!

most likely under warrantee and replaced for free. i don't see them trying to repair these on-site.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.