Sure...and if you go back and look at the numbers, the Mac took a long time to establish itself. The iPhone was much quicker, sure. But that doesn't suggest that the AVP has to follow that model exactly. And of course Apple knew that a $3500 product wasn't going to reach global penetration like the iPhone.
I get that you don't like the product. It may never, ever, ever be for you. But your dislike says nothing about the product or the category, other than you don't like it and it's not for you.
Too many pretending to be experts. An N of 1 is not data.
I would if that hypothetical brick cost the price of an actual brickHow many MBA's does it take to realize that nobody wants to pay $3500 to strap a brick to their face
How many MBA's does it take to realize that nobody wants to pay $3500 to strap a brick to their face
I still enjoy my AVP every day no matter what others’ opinions are. The features that are coming with visionOS 2 are awesome.
On the business side, AVP brought in more than $2B in sales (rough estimate). With a very high margin. Tell me of another AR/VR business that brings in this much cash from hardware sales. Meta is at $1B with… wait for it… $16B in LOSSES for the year.
Sure. They stopped working on it because nobody’s buying AVP OR they stopped working on it to lower their operating loss in the hardware division.
A potential that even Tim Cook could not articulate, beyond lying on his back to watch movies. This is why no one is buying.Regarding Vision Pro sales, that's such a shame. It has so much potential.
i want a 3500 avp strapped to my face. i just don't want to pay for it.
True, but Apple nowadays feels way too entitled to create a truly new product category. They simply expect everyone to buy their products no matter what price they charge.Regarding Vision Pro sales, that's such a shame. It has so much potential.
More than Apple has on staff apparently.How many MBA's does it take to realize that nobody wants to pay $3500 to strap a brick to their face
Buy whatever they release at whatever price point. I’d argue if Apple charges their first gen vision pro $35000, there would still be Apple fans lining up to “embrace the future”, even taking out a loan to buy it.More like Apple can’t sell this over engineered device and its competitors don’t want to make the same failure. Not every company has a fan base as loyal as Apple that will buy whatever they release.
It helps ensure that the product sticks around and is continued to be supported by Apple.How do apple’s profits help your experience again?
Buy whatever they release at whatever price point. I’d argue if Apple charges their first gen vision pro $35000, there would still be Apple fans lining up to “embrace the future”, even taking out a loan to buy it.
Only apple has such a cult to sleep on. Literally only Apple.
You know what was even more entertaining? Watching people opt for pricier iPhones over cheaper android handsets, with Apple going on to command the lion's share of profits in the smartphone market, while brands like LG and HTC suffer from negative margins and eventually drop out of the smartphone race altogether.I kind of wish they'd REALLY push the high end with some products ... just for the entertainment value of watching people figure out how to justify the cost and purchase
I'm always amazed to watch it even just with current iPhones (as one example)
Go for it Apple!
This needs a citation.Meta was aiming to sell the device for under $1,000, but that was not going to be possible with the high cost of the displays.
Just as possible, Meta‘s subterfuge tricked Apple into pouring their money, resources, and focus into a white elephant.more accurate headline: Meta couldn't out engineer Apple
Because the CEO thought it was clearly going to have large appeal.For the life of me, I don't understand why a company with the market cap the size of Apple is focusing so much on something that is so clearly going to have such little appeal.
If you were in Cook’s shoes you would have invested more into this pointless product? Apple wants the little people to risk their capital and sweat on the software.What do you mean "focusing so much"? They're not focusing enough.
And Apple is hoping you will also read AI as Apple Intelligence.I totally read MBA as “MacBook Air,” took me a minute to figure out why they’d need more than one!
Arrogance, I would say.VR is niche. Apple refusing to call it VR stinks of naivety.
Yeah I agree. It’s the best implementation of VR/AR seen yet being squandered by a lack of any support whatsoever by Apple to curate a market.True, but Apple nowadays feels way too entitled to create a truly new product category. They simply expect everyone to buy their products no matter what price they charge.
Instead, what they should have done is offer the AVP for a significantly lower price, swallow the losses, invest heavily in developers and content creators for the AVP, and create a market they can then dominate for years.
Prior to the unveiling, I assumed Apple had a killer app for it. Even after the unveiling I still thought they had something they hadn't shown us yet.Nobody was expecting the VP to be a blockbuster product.
100% one of the dumbest things. It isn't ready to release until it is small enough where people can wear it without looking like Cyborgs. Just releasing products that don't have any support or use for. iPad is still way too overpowered while running an OS that can't keep up with its abilities. Now they have a device that no one has any use for.How many MBA's does it take to realize that nobody wants to pay $3500 to strap a brick to their face