Agreed - they didn't learn from the Touchpad, or the Palm Pre?
While i understand where your coming from i really do and i say well done to MS for at least understanding the hardware and software intergration importance. they still don't get it.
a tablet needs to be a tablet with a tablet OS to be a really good tablet. and notebook/desktop need to be a notebook/desktop with Desktop OS to be a really good notebook/desktop
its can't be all in one as experience will never be the same.
as Tim said in D10. tablet needs to be tablet without the legacy of PC to be really a superior device" and PC needs to be a PC without the limitations of Tablet to be really a PC. something long those lines
Once MS understands this then truely this will be a very good product. at the moment its feels like they putting all of their eggs in basket and hoping it all does not fall and get scrambled
That said, a keyboard? and more efficient data entry? With Apple and Google pushing for voice and other forms of input (Gyroscope, accelerometer, etc), I think the Keyboard is a bit backward thinking.
While the keyboard built into the cover is nice there is one area where Microsoft has failed.
Apple long ago realized that presentations have more impact if you include the phrase "Ships Today!". Without that all you presentation is for naught
Did you think the same thing about Apple's iPad wireless keyboard ?![]()
You get more done on the iPad because it doen't crash and lose your data, no worries about viruses, and no distractions from lag caused by low system resources and apps running in the background.
What must you do on a netbook that you can do gracefully on an iPad? Don't tell me flash related crap....
and iPad is superior to any netbook high or low end. End of story.
Anti-Lucifer is offline Report Post
I had to smile at around 14 mins into the video, he has to replace the tablet as it looks like it froze.![]()
It took more than 2 years, but the iPad actually has some decent competition finally.
I agree about the lack of a portable keyboard (stationary docks are available though), but you'd be surprised how much you can do on an iPad. All you really need for work is iWork (or Office, soon to be available), Mail, Safari, and such.
Multitasking between two apps (example: Safari and iWork) would be something for them to consider adding, though.
Did you think the same thing about Apple's iPad wireless keyboard ?![]()
Apple long ago realized that presentations have more impact if you include the phrase "Ships Today!". Without that all you presentation is for naught
iOS is a full blown operating system. I find the iPad's onscreen keyboard to be quite nice, along with apples Bluetooth keyboard.
iPad has consumption and content creation apps. Using legacy windows apps with a chiclet keyboard is absurd. Just buy an ultrabook or MacBook air.
Yep, just like
- Ping
- iDVD
- iWeb
- DVD Studio
- iDisk
- iWeb hosting
...
Or not. If the iPad hadn't been a hit, Apple would've dumped it as fast as Microsoft dumps non profitable products. It's called business sense.
Did you think the same thing about Apple's iPad wireless keyboard ?![]()
You tried to stab me with the wrong product. I like the wireless keyboard, it works great with my Macbook or Mac Mini.
The iPad dock with keyboard, totally different story, and I do share the same feelings for that, as I do the Microsoft Smart key-cover thing.
You tried to stab me with the wrong product. I like the wireless keyboard, it works great with my Macbook or Mac Mini.
The iPad dock with keyboard, totally different story, and I do share the same feelings for that, as I do the Microsoft Smart key-cover thing.
The USB port makes this more useful than an iPad already.
watching videos on the iPad with no stand is a PITA.
Maybe they have a chance
The problem is that right now the MS ecosystem is basically nonexistent. Apple probably has more "fart apps" than MS has apps IN TOTAL for their mobile OS at this point.
The idea of a tablet/computer hybrid sounds good at first until I start to think about what I'd actually do with it. 1) If I really want to be productive (write code, manipulate spreadsheets, use Photoshop, etc) i'll use a laptop or a real computer with 2x the screen space. 2) If I want to play hardcore games I'll use a desktop or Xbox/PS3. 3) If I want to just check mail, view the web, watch videos, play casual games, video chat....well you can do all that with an iPad so why pay 1.5x-2x as much for a WindowsPro tablet (which is heavier and will likely have crappy battery life)?
The difference is Apple in the Jobs II era has been extremely disciplined in product launches, where M$ launches products in an almost willy-nilly fashion, numb to what the market wants or can be sold on.
The last huge flop Apple had was the Cube, which failed mostly because it was too expensive for what it was, and adding to that was the fragile build quality of the case. But even those who bought Cubes were able to use them, and upgrade them, well after Apple discontinued them.
Compare that to M$'s flops like Bob s/w, the Zune (including the Windows Plays For Sure incompatibility fiasco), UltimateTV, the Kin phone (lasted all of, what 3 months), just to name a few off the top of my head. Most of these became bricks once, or soon after, M$ dropped support.
OTOH the Apple products you list were discontinued mostly because technology eclipsed their need. iDVD/DVD Studio Pro -- both still work fine. iWeb and Ping are the only real clunkers in the list. Everyone who set up an iWeb site knew it couldn't be exported. And Ping was 1) free, and 2) not anything anyone depended on. Heck I don't think anyone even used it. iDisk was ahead of its time, and not a short-lived product but people like me who used it easily xfered all their data to services like DropBox. Nothing was lost.