Doesn't Windows run ads on the desktop now? That sounds like bloat that does no one any good except MS.This looks good. Windows 10 is great, too. I like how they put "streamlined" into parentheses. I am not sure what that's supposed to imply but Windows isn't any more bloated these days than macOS.
Touchscreen on a laptop? No thanks.
If it was up to me, I'd sell it as a loss-leader to schools. Get them hooked on the ecosystem early, and keep them familiar with my brand. Who cares if they make a loss selling $200-$300 laptops to schools for schoolwork when that eventually trickles up into teens and adults buying into your products in the future!I think it was a confused event. Microsoft was billing it as an education event which is why most tech sites assumed they would be launching a chromebook like machine. But listening to Panos Panay the device is clearly targeted to Mac users. The device doesn't really match what the event was supposed to be about.
That's kind of like saying another $300 Android phone just got released and Apple is caught snoozing. Apple doesn't currently exist in any of the budget markets unless you consider iPads competing with this laptop.100% will be pre-ordering once available on the Microsoft UK store + upgrade to full Windows 10.
Apple caught snoozing. Again.
Same. I'm all for competition, but this doesn't seem very competitive.
It doesn't even run full windows!
Touchscreen on a laptop? No thanks.
Apple macbooks start at $1299, you have no reason to even laugh and the screen is a mess on this device so I give microsoft props for giving a beautiful device with up to date specs and not a basic m3 processor......
To be fair, the $300 price difference also doubles the size of the SSD from 128GB to 256GB.There is a lot to like here, but the upgrade pricing from stock set up is too steep. Come on, Appl... I mean, Microsoft.
Same. I'm all for competition, but this doesn't seem very competitive.
Pro upgrade is also free until the end of the year.
$999 sounds like a great deal until you see you get a lousy 4GB RAM and the 8GB option adds $300 to the price.
The i7 models are $1599 for 8GB RAM and it costs $2199 to take this to 16GB RAM.
In reality, these are very expensive systems lumbered with Windows as your operating system
It doesn't even run full windows!
Everything that runs on Windows 10 S has to be downloaded from the Windows Store, which will suggest alternatives to any programs it doesn't offer.
This be RT in disguise.
I still don't miss a touch screen on my Macbook pro. That's what tablets are for.
Us Apple users can hardly complain about Microsoft data-mining. When Siri looks something up on the web who do you think does the search? Does Apple have a search engine? No they don't. They use their partner Microsoft's search engine Bing. You can bet Microsoft data-mines those searches just as bad as Google does but hey, at least Apple doesn't do it directly.Windows "S" for surveillance!
MS is data mining and adding ads to the os, so many reasons not to buy hardware from them along with high prices for product too.
I don't get it. Why would someone get this over a Surface Pro 4? It's more expensive when it has the same RAM, CPU, and SSD, except it has a lower resolution display and camera (no rear camera), missing many of the sensors, and weighs nearly twice as much.
I can't watch the video right now. Would someone explain the use case that makes the Surface Laptop a better fit than the Pro 4?
Didn't watch event but I can believe it. MS is pulling an Apple Watch for their last few hardware releases. They're promising to please many different market segments and customer types but can only appeal to one or two in the end. They just don't know yet themselves so their messaging isn't very clear a the moment.I think it was a confused event. Microsoft was billing it as an education event which is why most tech sites assumed they would be launching a chromebook like machine. But listening to Panos Panay the device is clearly targeted to Mac users. The device doesn't really match what the event was supposed to be about.
you have no idea what components are inside that $2199 Windows laptop yet. It could be a crap SSD, slow RAM, slow i5 processor. Microsoft were vague on pricing and we see why now, and they are vague on the specs which could also point to more bad news. We do know the MacBook Pro uses high-end components.
What year was that taken?
I agree. But Microsoft has had success with selling touchscreens on their vendors. Even if you use it minimally, such as using your thumb to scroll through a PowerPoint deck (which is all I've done with my Lenovo), they aren't generally a downside by themselves.
I want more from Apple besides an insistence that they're eschewing touchscreens. Fine. Let's see the touchbar Macs get a more reasonable base price.
It's barely better than the Macbook Air that comes in at the exact same pricepoint - $999 - and that's a machine that hasn't even seen an update in 2 years!
It has only an iterative increase CPU wise, it has 4GB less RAM, it certainly doesn't have the quality track pad and it's tied to a locked down version of an already confused OS, the better display is the only way that this competes with 2 year old outdated hardware.
It should be able to smash the Macbook Air out of the park at this stage in the game, maybe a year or so ago this would have been competitive but if it's struggling to pull ahead of an old system that's probably going to be EOL like the MBA then Microsoft have some issues ahead.