Reading the posts in this thread shows lots of ruffled feathers. On both sides. And people on both sides trying to ruffle the feathers of the other side.
All this hullabaloo over a device that will sell in the 100-200K range per quarter.
Reading the posts in this thread shows lots of ruffled feathers. On both sides. And people on both sides trying to ruffle the feathers of the other side.
All this hullabaloo over a device that will sell in the 100-200K range per quarter.
If it got this much attention and passion on the street, Microsoft would be ecstatic.
Which speaks volumes about the sad state of MS these days if < 1 million sales per year would make them ecstatic.
Specs say 9 hours for internet browsing, that's pretty darn good for what it packs.
Except that the Surface line has been proven to be a failing formula. Twice.
Except that you are quite ignoring my point. Constantly repeating that the first two generations weren't very successful does not respond to anything I have actually said.
What's wrong with reiterating that Surface is a complete failure to date? Why double-down on a failed product? MS should get out of hardware completely and focus on cloud.
Check your basic facts - the Surface Pro 3 is nearly twice the weight of the iPad Air - how could it be otherwise? The iPad Air weighs in at 478 grams, the SP3 at 800.
This is significant, because most reviews I've read who actually HAD SP3s to play with immediately felt it was much too heavy.
OOPS - my bad - I just saw it was actually a Macbook Air they were comparing the weight too. You can understand how I might have missed that - it doesn't make any sense.
A million Surface pro's a year would be a decent start. What are the sales numbers of the MacBook Air? That's what the Pro price range would be, not the iPad.
Lots of positive vibes coming from The Verge thus far.
Quick comparison to the MBA...gotta admit the Surface looks slicker, cooler and more eye catching, while the MBA is showing its age.
http://www.theverge.com/2014/5/21/5737664/surface-pro-3-vs-macbook-air-crown
9 hours isn't going to happen. I've owned a Surface Pro 2 and it gets 7 hours at most.
Battery life seems legit
No, I havent performed any battery tests*, but from using it all day and having hordes of people ogle it all night, it still had 30% by midnight. It doesnt feel like I need to monitor the battery on the Surface Pro 3, which is a good thing. Well see though how that holds up over the next few days.
Lots of positive vibes coming from The Verge thus far.
Quick comparison to the MBA...gotta admit the Surface looks slicker, cooler and more eye catching, while the MBA is showing its age.
http://www.theverge.com/2014/5/21/5737664/surface-pro-3-vs-macbook-air-crown
Well, it's no wonder. Microsoft has just released the Surface Pro 3. Apple's MacBook Air is almost four years old. It is surely showing its age, as Apple is taking a long time to refresh it.
4 years old??? They updated the MBA to Haswell in 2013 and gave it a minor spec bump this year. They've been refreshing the MBA every year.
I could only hope that. And multi-tasking as well. So the iPad could finally become a full-featured device.
No hardware acceleration on non Apple supported formats.
Do you need MKV / MTS acceleration?
On My iPad Air, probably not, but on the iPad 3 HD did not play well. It should not be that way, and if I got large file size BR rips, I should not have to test them, they should play with hardware acceleration by default. It may help[ battery life, unsure.
It still can't be used seriously in the business world.
1. no guaranteed backwards comparability. Early iwork versions can't be read on the current version. However, MS office can open every excel version's files since the dawn of time.
2. windows users, which make up 90% of the computer market, can't read your files. Yes, you can export to Excel, but there is no guarantee that it will be 100% the same on MS Excel.
3. Excel is the standard. It has been for years, and it would take a lot to remove it's market position.
1. It helps in every respect.
2. MKV's with h.264 video around 10 Mbps (that is, slowed-down ones) are played in HW by players like nPlayer or AVPlayer. Original BD MKV's (with bitrates sometimes well over 30 Mpbs) aren't. That is, don't try to play back direct BD rips done with MakeMKV on iDevices - they can't be played in hardware.
I'd like some other restrictions also removed from the iPad. There won't be an OSX on an iPad,but certainly an ability to bring it closer to enhance productivity.
No hardware acceleration on non Apple supported formats.
My rMBP sees my WDTV drive out of the box, my iPad Air needs a third party app. Make networking like any PC or Mac, see and access all devices on the network.
A tablet OS that is prime for consumption, can be more creative if it gets closer to full features
Doubt there will be a USB slot, but at least allow standard networking so we can use wifi to a portable HDD, or a lightning to USB adapter
4 years old??? They updated the MBA to Haswell in 2013 and gave it a minor spec bump this year. They've been refreshing the MBA every year.