These comments also drive me crazy. Do you know for a fact that Apple is excluding NVIDIA cards just to smite you users that need it? Or could it POSSIBLY be some sort of strained business relationship? Or could it POSSIBLY be that NVIDIA cards kept failing and needed recalls? Or could it POSSIBLY be some sort of contract with AMD?
Seriously, AMD cards are not THAT bad. It sucks if your workflow needs CUDA, but you should probably get a Windows computer anyway if it does. If the concern is gaming, people GREATLY exaggerate the issue. If you believe what people here would say regarding AMD and NVIDIA, the MAX you can get on ANY game on AMD would be 5 FPS just because it is AMD. Even if the game is Terraria or a 2D game.
Guess what? My friend and I were playing a game of Heroes of the Storm. He used my 5K iMac with the Radeon Pro 580. He was able to play at native resolution (the full 5K resolution) on Max in Windows and still have 60+ FPS. On an AMD card. GASP!
How does macOS only excel at Final Cut Pro? I have Adobe After Effects still on subscription and a Windows PC with a GTX 1080. I do not see ANY difference between CUDA and running on my 5K iMac. So my macOS excels at After Effects too. Affinity Photo and Affinity Designer beat the crap out of Photoshop and Illustrator. So my macOS excels at graphic design as well. Logic Pro and Garageband beat the crap out of the Windows equivalents. So my macOS excels at music creation too.
Visual Studio on Windows beats the crap out of any other programming environment, so Windows is good in that regard.
Gaming on Windows (even on Mac hardware with AMD) beats the crap out of macOS, so Windows is good in that regard.
[doublepost=1543295787][/doublepost]
Um. It is different in 2018. The "cheap and affordable" iPhone is the iPhone 7 which Apple still sells. It is $449. If you want current technology, it will not be "cheap and affordable". The $750 is the "cheap and affordable" of the current technology. Which it is cheaper than the Xs and Xs Max