In contrast to the Intel adds this is at least somewhat honest (as honest as an add can get) in pointing out differences.
This comparison if one prefers to call it as such is not accurate.
To compare something it has to be done on hardware, software and its synergy to work together flawlessly.
Microsoft Surface runs a laptop/desktop OS, why is the comparison done with a tablet that uses a mobileOS. Why not compare it to macOS like an M1 MBA/P.
Surface has a fan, iPad does not. MacBook Pro does. The flawed comparison would give this to the iPad as no fan equals no noise and less weight and battery drain.
Surface has a touchscreen, MBA/P does not but is WindowsOS optimized for touch input or just makes traditional mouse input as touch elements, technically iPadOS does this with touchpad and mouse assistive support. How useful and productive is it to move ones hand/finger from a keyboard, trackpad or mouse to interact with elements on a screen. Now if it’s working in tablet only model then I will give Surface the slight edge on this convertibility.
Battery life, MBA/P and iPad win this hands down.
OS support, yep macOS and iPadOS will be supported for at least 6+ years, can we count on Microsoft to do the same.
Anti-Virus software, yep not needed on an iPad or macOS.
The list goes on, about the few things a Surface has is when converted to run in tablet mode in a single device, but with so many negatives even in this mode it renders its use very limited and Microsoft knows it. Now if Surface runs on ARM, without a fan, log battery life, trim some weight and dimensions then it will provide some stiff competition at present this is not the case.
Its a tablet who is connecting physical things to it when in use, it’s as absurd as doing the same with a phone, it’s meant to be wireless and many wireless technologies exist for display, storage, etc. I have an iPhone, iPad Mini and M1 MBA and I have yet to connect a thumb drive to it, everything is wireless except recharging it.