I sort of hate to admit it, but I actually liked the Cube.In fact, I don't think you've ever been right about anything. Apple's released more duds than successes: Cube, Apple TV, MobileMe, iPhone 4, Final Cut Pro X, and Lion.
I sort of hate to admit it, but I actually liked the Cube.In fact, I don't think you've ever been right about anything. Apple's released more duds than successes: Cube, Apple TV, MobileMe, iPhone 4, Final Cut Pro X, and Lion.
If he's being this defensive just imagine the folks at Apple. Tim Cook, Jony Ive, and Scott Forstall, all of you better be taking notes because this is how innovation is truly done, ladies.
See, Microsoft gets it. Apple doesn't. Microsoft knows that you don't have to sacrifice specs to gain excellent user experience. Because that's dumb. You need top-of-the-line specs to achieve top-of-the-line user experience. Apple made compromises because they're more concerned with how pretty things look. Microsoft aren't making any compromises because they're more concerned with crafting the best possible user experience and that means cramming the OS with every possible feature, whether it's needed or not. Complexity is always better than minimalism.
That's why the fan noise and heat are non-issues. Microsoft is trying to achieve is unity and that requires a real CPU, not some baby CPU. Now people can finally get real work done on a tablet using a real program, not some dumbed-down-specifically-tailored-for-tablet program. God, I can't wait until this iFad nonsense to end and for Microsoft to finally delivers a usable tablet OS.
Kin, Zune HD, Windows 7, and now Windows 8. Wow. Just wow. I'm speechless.
I thank God everyday you aren't responsible for designing anything.It's just my opinion. I don't understand how removing features is actually a good thing. Complexity leads to choice and the choice is freedom.
I thank God everyday you aren't responsible for designing anything.
Just like there's no real advantage in WP7. The OS looks like a bunch of compromises were made in order to a) avoid IP infringement (late to the game again!) and b) difference for the sake of being different.
And it's not working.
I just installed this in under 10 mins. In Parallels.
I'm afraid you are cherry-picking data to fit your confirmation bias. The iPhone 4 fiasco contradicts the so-called evidence you provided.
Also, HTC's CEO conducted a survey that proves that the iPhone is quickly becoming unpopular.
I'm happy that you're enthusiastic about the products you love
but your talent for prognosticating is poor.
Your prediction that the iPad would be a revolutionary device has yet to become true.
In fact, I don't think you've ever been right about anything.
As a design engineer myself I always have to remind myself that the best part is no part, the best feature is no feature.
B
64 bit or 32?
B
Let me get this straight. The best selling phone in the US is a fiasco and a dud?
e.g. https://www.macrumors.com/2011/08/22/iphone-4-and-3gs-rank-as-best-selling-u-s-smartphones/
What do you expect a study reported on by the CEO of HTC to have found?
B
Good lord this DL is going to take time.
No point in wasting the time to do it. They know the files will be uploaded to torrent sites shortly by everyone else.No kidding. MS needs to discover the joy of torrents.
Well, the Big Mac is one of the best selling burgers in the world. But that doesn't make it the best.
I acknowledge that the iPhone 4 sales are impressive. But what is the reason?
I believe the iPhone 4 sells well because it's pretty. That's what Apple does best. I admit that. They know how to make things look pretty. But they're poor at delivering specs.
Microsoft is throwing everything into windows 8 in an attempt to commoditize everything ios has innovated the past few years.
Lol - I hope this post was sarcasm.
Microsoft doesn't get it. It's all about user experience - not specs.
Microsoft is throwing everything into windows 8 in an attempt to commoditize everything ios has innovated the past few years.
Windows 8, as demonstrated, shows that Microsoft doesn't truly understand why the iPad has been successful.
When push comes to shove, iOS will be superior for tablet devices as it will require less resources, offer superior battery life, and as HW and SW capabilities expand, offer support for more extensive applications.
All that being said, I think windows 8 offers the potential for more compelling PC designs.
Well, the Big Mac is one of the best selling burgers in the world. But that doesn't make it the best.
I acknowledge that the iPhone 4 sales are impressive. But what is the reason? I believe the iPhone 4 sells well because it's pretty. That's what Apple does best. I admit that. They know how to make things look pretty. But they're poor at delivering specs.
There are phones in the market that have better specs but I guess people would rather pick a phone that looks prettier than one that has awesome features.
No point in wasting the time to do it. They know the files will be uploaded to torrent sites shortly by everyone else.
Sounds nice to me. It's partially a "commoditization" but also an innovation since it adds another option for consumers.
Apple's business model is based on building multiple devices as a hardware maker.
Microsoft as a software maker wants to sell software and supporting multiple hardware is a matter of survival. On this forum I read often we are living in a post-PC era. So MS have to change its model as PCs tend to disappear.
Ding ding ding. And one day you will see why the x86 move was the wrong move because it really takes away from the user experience and lacks innovation PPC has, and ARM also has/will have.One day you will learn (as the competition is, especially in the tablet segment) that USER EXPERIENCE trumps specs.
A couple of comments:
1. It's obvious that Windows 8 with its Metro UI will be controversial because this is Microsoft's most radical UI change since the arrival of Windows 95. (It should be noted that the basics of the UI from Windows 95 to Windows 7 has not significantly changed, especially with the default Task Bar setup on the bottom of the screen with the Start button on the very left, program launch icons just to the right, and system status icons on the right side.) The UI has been designed to use full multitouch touchscreen functionality, so Windows 8 can run on tablet computers easily without needing a stylus.
2. I myself expect Microsoft to ship three different versions of Windows 8:
Home--your choice of Metro or Windows 7 UI, with the default to the Metro UI. This will be the most common version for desktop and laptop computers.
Professional--will default to Windows 7 UI (with the option for the Metro UI), and adds extra functions designed for business users, especially with disk security and connections to corporate networks.
Tablet--Metro UI only, designed to work with tablet computers running ARM architecture or the new generation of very low power Intel x86-64 CPU's.
3. I think people should actually try out the Metro interface before they criticize it. It's possible that Metro could be surprisingly good interface for a tablet computer, since Microsoft probably closely studied how Apple implements the interface in iOS for the iPad and made a number of possible improvements.
Ding ding ding. And one day you will see why the x86 move was the wrong move because it really takes away from the user experience and lacks innovation PPC has, and ARM also has/will have.