As long as Microsoft insists on these foolish comparisons, all they're saying is that they have the inferior product and they're insecure about it.
I often use my iPad mini with a kickstand that way, you know, like a laptop.The kickstand still makes it entirely impractical to use on a lap, unlike, y’know, a laptop.
Buy a windows machine and move on.Well, step by step, Apple has managed to eliminate the usefulness of their computers. Eliminating ports, eliminating magsafe, the useless/obnoxious touchbar, eliminating 32bit support, eliminating windows compatibility by ditching Intel.
Yes yes we can all think of reasons to justify why each of those made sense, and that's all very wonderful. But it leaves a gaping hole in the market that MS is filling with surface. Apple still treats all tablets as mobile devices. MS just created the Surface Pro 7Plus, which comfortably runs full-featured pro design/engineering software, allows for sketching and drawing on screen, programmable touch commands, & ranges from whatever, $800-$2800. To get that basic functionality out of the macbook pro, I've got to string together last years top of the line intel-based MBP16 with enough horsepower to run boot camp through parallels (though parallels breaks wacom's mousing functionality), & screen sharing over to the ipad, for more than double the price, and which is laggy. Otherwise I can plug a Wacom Cintiq in, spend 3x the money, and have a giant hulking beast to cart around. If you're benefitted by working directly on-screen, it's pretty much no contest. As Apple has focused and limited their product line to a very narrow traditional set of use cases, they've left several major gaping holes in the market, one of which MS is now pretty casually filling with the Surface. As soon as you can connect a Surface Pro to an eGPU for more power and a big external display, it's over.
Obviously you buy the OS that runs the software you need. I won’t be surprised if in 3 years those apps are enabled to run on Apple Silicon.How can you assure it is a budget issue? My PC is twice as expensive as a MacBook Pro.
Regarding not understanding why PCs are better for engineers let me enlighten you. The main reason is the professional software needed which is not available on Mac. There is a lot of modeling software, structural design, finite elements, etc. that are mainstream in the industry and they do not run on Mac.
I tried using virtual machines but the performance hit is so brutal to the point of being unusable.
This is nice,almost all the features has been changed, looking for more as MacBook is also my choice as I bought it from one of the online portal that is dubaimachines.com
Microsoft yesterday shared a new ad on YouTube titled "Microsoft Surface Pro 7: The Better Choice," in which the company compares its tablet computer to Apple's 13-inch M1 MacBook Pro, as spotted by MSPoweruser.
The ad highlights the Surface Pro 7's touchscreen and included stylus as opposed to only a "little bar" (the Touch Bar) on the MacBook Pro. Other advantages of the Surface Pro 7 mentioned in the ad include the detachable keyboard, a cheaper price, and the claim that the tablet is "a much better gaming device" than the MacBook Pro.
Results uploaded on Geekbench show that the Intel Core i3-equipped Surface Pro 7 with 4GB of RAM has single-core and multi-core scores of 769 and 1,851, respectively. Additionally, the Intel Core i5-equipped Surface Pro 7 with 8GB of RAM has single-core and multi-core scores of 1,210 and 4,079, respectively. By comparison, the M1 chip running on a 13-inch MacBook Pro with 8GB of unified memory achieved greater performance than both Surface models with single-core and multi-core scores of 1,735 and 7,686, respectively.
The 12.3-inch Surface Pro 7 starts at $749.99 with 128GB of storage and 4GB of RAM and increases to $2,299.99 with 1TB of storage and 16GB of RAM. In comparison, the current 13-inch M1 MacBook Pro starts at $1,299 with 256GB of storage and 8GB of unified memory and increases to $2,299 for 2TB of storage and 16GB of unified memory.
Microsoft has long positioned its Surface devices as an ideal combination of both a tablet and computer experience. In years past, Microsoft has released several ads promoting its Surface lineup over Apple's MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, and iPad lineup.
Article Link: Microsoft Touts Surface Pro 7 as 'The Better Choice' Over MacBook Pro in New Ad
Hehe ... yet so many adults let a pot smoking teenager do exactly that ....This is why I don't let a 10 year old tell me what computer to buy.
i have a maxed out surface book 3 and i love it. Apple should definitely make a touchscreen mac. That being said, my maxed out M1 macbook pro is so much more powerful it's ridiculous.
What? Apple's marketing does this all the time in both the computer and smartphone businesses.
I remember last year when they compared their overpriced monitor to a professional monitor only to be later trashed in side by side comparisons... some defended the price difference ($6000 vs $44000) but it was Apple itself who made the comparison during the keynote.
By the way, there are many reasons why a PC is a better purchase, especially for professional Engineers and gamers. Macs have a edge on content creation.
They don’t build what users need, but what users want which sells things. If the user stops using the touchscreen after a week, no problem.It's just so horrible to use a lifted touchscreen, unless you really want to train your arm muscles. Why PC makers don't ever understand that.
Ah, I missed that.Compared to the M1 Mac, Surface performance must be much worse in the processing/graphics/battery departments.
However the advertisement specifically states that the price includes the Pen and Type Cover, offer valid through 31st January.
You use an iPad mini with a third-party kickstand on a lap? Me and your neck are sorry to hear that.I often use my iPad mini with a kickstand that way, you know, like a laptop.
This ad falls apart like a house of cards.
Yeah, you don’t get touch on an MBP. You also don’t get a detachable keyboard, because it’s not that kind of device (is their point that the Surface Laptop is a bad device?).
But then they bring up the price. At that price, the Surface Pro 7 includes neither the pen nor any keyboard, and its specs are very poor.
Why didn’t they simply compare it with the iPad Pro? It makes much more sense that way, and they could tout that it runs Windows apps and games (though you can’t convince me that there’s much of a market of college kids who want to run games on a Windows tablet. It’s an awkward compromise).
At least there is some coherence in this Ad, it's not only played by a 10 years old kid but also conceived by a guy the same age.weak 😂
got a pen, love my games ... ??? dude!!
??? Actually they are. I’m sure you noticed them exploring, keyword ‘exploring’ ARM processors for Surface tablets.