You argue and argue about the echoing thunder and yet miraculously fail to see the lightning!
If you really mean that, it's about time you tried using arguments instead of unfounded claims as you have done up until now.
But I guess that's too much to ask
Edit:
Your commentary is revealing-how much longer do women and "minorities" have to be treated like apes or children. Doesn't the "persuit of justice" ring "Any" liberty bells from your narrow life.Women and all are human beings worthy of fair representation. Swallow it you blind god foresaken,monetarily confused Prejudiced hater.
I see you tried after all. But reading this has me wondering:
I'm sorry to break it to you, but "fair representation" doesn't mean that any and all adverts should include both genders, nor that it should include any and all races, ages, and people with no disabilities to the most extremes.
I think it's time you came down from that high horse of yours. But I guess you would have to mowe yourself through all that **** you dropped.
Where do you see me "hating"?
Where do you see me being "prejudiced"?
"Pursuit of justice" doesn't mean that, say, in a ad we HAVE to have women. Nor that we HAVE to have men. Especially in a commercial like this.
How on earth does seeing this in more than monochrome black and white means I have a "narrow life"? For all intents and purposes, you're the one who can't seem to see the forest because of all the trees. I guess it's easier to focus on a single tree, though …
I particularly like your claim that by NOT having a woman in this ad, women are treated like apes and children (!!!). I think I'll put that down to a freudian slip of yours.