That could be. When the results match up with that assertion 200 years from now, I'll tip my hat to you!

Until then, the evidence says that win-loss record doesn't determine playoff results.
I wish both of us could be like vampires and live hundreds of years, so we could continue this numbers/odds vs. performance debate.
There are times when there are events that completely defy the odds.
For instance, the city I live in of less than 2000 residents is mostly a retirement and summer home area. The percentage of young families with kids is very, very small. In the small school district, there are 11 school buses. I rode on one of them with a guy named "Pat".
So many years later, when I was at university in London, I am in a basement will fellow American exchange students from several colleges, not anywhere near Cal Poly where I went to, or the small northern California town I grew up in. One USC student tells me that they know of my small, rather insignificant town and they know only one person there. They know Pat from the same school bus I rode every day in northern California. And here we are in London. What are the odds? But the story gets even weirder, as there is this other Cal Poly person, from southern California, who knows Pat, too, but who doesn't know me or the USC student. The two question each other to corroborate their facts to see if it's the same Pat from the same town of 2,000 people. Fact by fact, they describe Pat to a T, his height, hair color, personality, etc.
So I run into two people from two different American schools who don't know each other, who like me are exchange students in London, who both happen to know the same person, who was the kid I rode on the bus with a decade earlier.
While studying John Nash in grad school, I brought this up to the professor who was a Nash enthusiast, and we couldn't come up with just how remote that was. It suggested that statistics are not the main factor in how the universe operates and there could be some "soft" factors in statistics we don't understand, such as fate.
My wife and I got the opportunity to watch John Nash speak at a local college, and he talked a little about certain subjective odds in statistics. Some say it borders on voodoo but it's interesting nonetheless. Some people at the college, a military graduate school that has a strong emphasis on counter-intelligence/national security, started asking him questions about these "soft" concepts in statistics. Statistics itself is not considered a hard maths, per se, and when there are people out there thinking that events can be altered by thoughts, attitudes, or body language, then it starts to enter into some little known realms.
I could see how some baseball players, famous for being superstitious, partake in strange rituals which may have nothing to do with hitting, pitching, and fielding.