Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Last I checked, the only teams fighting for a playoff spot are Milwaukee, Philly, and San Diego. Others are just jockeying for position.
 
81 - 81

200w.gif
 
So...Mike Judge's new contract.

MLB contracts are fully guaranteed. So, a ten year contract at 500 large (that's a number being floated around recently) means they will be paying him 50 million for several years after his numbers fall off. When guys reach 35, they start declining and Judge will be 40 by the end of the contract. I get the publicity appeal and bringing people into the park, but it is not a wise move. If he were 25, yes. But not at age 30.
 
So...Mike Judge's new contract.

MLB contracts are fully guaranteed. So, a ten year contract at 500 large (that's a number being floated around recently) means they will be paying him 50 million for several years after his numbers fall off. When guys reach 35, they start declining and Judge will be 40 by the end of the contract. I get the publicity appeal and bringing people into the park, but it is not a wise move. If he were 25, yes. But not at age 30.

I have a feeling his contract is going to be insane and I wonder if he stays...
 
So...Mike Judge's new contract.

MLB contracts are fully guaranteed. So, a ten year contract at 500 large (that's a number being floated around recently) means they will be paying him 50 million for several years after his numbers fall off. When guys reach 35, they start declining and Judge will be 40 by the end of the contract. I get the publicity appeal and bringing people into the park, but it is not a wise move. If he were 25, yes. But not at age 30.
Word on the street is he will sign with the S.F. Giants.
 
Interesting strategy by the Mets. They are not going to pitch their two aces back to back. Scherzer is going to start G1. If they win, some other starter will start G2 leaving DeGrom for a must win G3 or G1 against the Dodgers.

Wonder if this is analytics or old fashioned managing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rafterman
Interesting strategy by the Mets. They are not going to pitch their two aces back to back. Scherzer is going to start G1. If they win, some other starter will start G2 leaving DeGrom for a must win G3 or G1 against the Dodgers.

Wonder if this is analytics or old fashioned managing.

In a three game series, it makes sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TechRunner
Word on the street is he will sign with the S.F. Giants.

Realistically, that's nothing but wishful thinking at this point.

A big splash/big cash free agent is the opposite of what their front office people like to do. Last season has proven to be an anomaly, and a mix of successful veterans at the end of their careers, thrift store/reclamation project signings, and promising, but unproven prospects was reflected in the record this season.

And on Judge's part, is a California homecoming (to a team with those questions) enough to overcome the spotlight in NY, especially if they go deep into the playoffs? He'll be paid no matter where he is.

Bonds left Pittsburgh, not NY, to return, and be the centerpiece of a franchise that was going to build a new park and new era under new ownership.

And while that era saw some success, and even a WS appearance, the run of championships in the early 2010s came as a result of their farm talent, supplemented by choice free agents, not lead by a big one like Bonds, or a Judge.

The current front office chief was hired to replicate what he did with the Dodgers, and their farm system, which needs time. Do they stick with that plan, or think shorter term with a big signing to keep people interested?
 
  • Like
Reactions: pachyderm
Realistically, that's nothing but wishful thinking at this point.

A big splash/big cash free agent is the opposite of what their front office people like to do. Last season has proven to be an anomaly, and a mix of successful veterans at the end of their careers, thrift store/reclamation project signings, and promising, but unproven prospects was reflected in the record this season.

And on Judge's part, is a California homecoming (to a team with those questions) enough to overcome the spotlight in NY, especially if they go deep into the playoffs? He'll be paid no matter where he is.

Bonds left Pittsburgh, not NY, to return, and be the centerpiece of a franchise that was going to build a new park and new era under new ownership.

And while that era saw some success, and even a WS appearance, the run of championships in the early 2010s came as a result of their farm talent, supplemented by choice free agents, not lead by a big one like Bonds, or a Judge.

The current front office chief was hired to replicate what he did with the Dodgers, and their farm system, which needs time. Do they stick with that plan, or think shorter term with a big signing to keep people interested?
Yeah, I was simply being facetious.
 
I just made up my post... although there has been some speculation on the Giants boards...

I'd bet he stays with the Yanks even though he grew up a Giants fan...

I just wonder if there will be any resentment that they weren't willing to pay him before the season?

In which case, he might go elsewhere.

But, yes, he is going to get paid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pachyderm
Interesting results from the wildcards. Seattle over Toronto, and San Diego over the Mets. Scherzer got hammered, you’d think the Mets will go with DeGrom in game 2 after all.

It’s a pity I can’t watch live on MLB.tv, there have been some changes to the contracts where some international markets don’t get live coverage, and US viewers who want to watch through MLB.tv have to verify a pay tv package. Unfortunately here in the netherlands we have ESPN and so we are one of the few international markets where MLB.tv don’t provide coverage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pachyderm
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.