The guys on 1st and Ten (ESPN) earlier today said that Bonds was definitely worth a $15M/1yr contract, but not a $20M/2yr contract. He definitely puts butts in seats.Just saw on ESPN that Bonds has agreed in principle to a 1-year, $16 million deal with the Giants...just need to firm everything up. I, for one, am glad that he'll be back in a Giant uniform next year and hope he's healthy enough to get to the record so that this doesn't hang over the franchise again next year.
The guys on 1st and Ten (ESPN) earlier today said that Bonds was definitely worth a $15M/1yr contract, but not a $20M/2yr contract. He definitely puts butts in seats.
and Drew's is five-years, $70M.
Looking at the comparison, I don't see where Drew's not the better choice. 22 less games played than Trot, Drew is only barely bettered in Career 2Bs, RBIs and Hits. Last year's numbers and projected, he's all over Nixon on Slugging. I'll concede IJ's point that he looks better on paper, but I still think, barring injury, Drew will earn his keep.That's a lot of money for a player almost exactly like Trot Nixon. It's not like Drew is any sort of "upgrade" from Trot, except in price tag (everyone knows Nixon would have given a substantial "hometown discount" like Arroyo did last year).
Now let's just hope Lugo turns out more like the immediately preceding free agent shortstop the Sox had, and not the one before him. I'm not knocking Edgar, he's a good player, just not in the AL.
The Giants could of paid him 5 bucks and he would of had to take it because no other team would want him.
But of course he would not have taken it. From the get-go, Bonds advertised his refusal to sign any performance incentive-based contract. Big guaranteed cash, or nothing, was his bargaining position. And he got it, from probably the only team that would offer it. The Giants could have signed a first-tier productive player instead of a fading star probably limping through his last season for that kind of money. The home-town crowd may show up in hopes of seeing him break the record but I think everybody has to know that this move is not going to help them win the division.
$16 million for one year of 42-year-old Bonds sounds a heckuva lot better than some of the absurd contracts behind handed out to the likes of Juan Pierre, Carlos Lee, Alfonso Soriano, Gary "One Year Semi-Wonder" Matthews Jr. et al. Not that the Giants didn't try to throw their money away on those guys, but they thankfully came up short.
Coming in to the off-season, I thought Bonds would get about $10-11 million, but other GMs' profligate ways increased his value. And I think all sides knew all along that San Francisco was the only place that made sense for Bonds, for all the good and bad reasons.
And Bonds didn't limp through the end of the season: his legs were finally back in good shape by August/September and his productivity was very high. Unless he gets another injury (knock on wood!), I think his 2007 numbers should be overall better than 2006.
Coming in to the off-season, I thought Bonds would get about $10-11 million, but other GMs' profligate ways increased his value. And I think all sides knew all along that San Francisco was the only place that made sense for Bonds, for all the good and bad reasons.
Bringing back Bonds alone won't help the Giants win the division.
I have mixed feelings about losing Schmidt. I thought for sure he was gone, and I've a mind to believe he'll not really be worth the money spent on him. For a guy who could be such a dominant pitcher, he'd get hurt or lose focus or whatever and just not be very consistent.
And the Dodgers might as well change their team colors to orange and black: it's looking like San Francisco South down there, right down to the new head trainer. It's kind of depressing IMO.
BTW, I like Dave Roberts too. Maybe he'll finally find a home in San Francisco. I always thought he deserved better than to be shuttled around from city to city.
The Giants committed a large chunk of their annual player salary to somebody who may be around mainly for show, when they could have have dealt for a high-caliber player in their prime for the same sort of money. What can I say? As a Dodger fan, I'm feeling no pain.![]()
Well, it's just a one year deal. I don't think those hurt a team at all, certainly not in the long run. And I think Bonds has a good shot at having a better year than last year, with the big caveat that he stays fairly healthy. Once the knee was fully back, he was very productive.
But the Giants' pitching also bothers me. Wonder if those Zito rumors will come to anything? Probably not. Talk about the ideal replacement for Schmidt, though...
Looking at the comparison, I don't see where Drew's not the better choice. 22 less games played than Trot, Drew is only barely bettered in Career 2Bs, RBIs and Hits. Last year's numbers and projected, he's all over Nixon on Slugging. I'll concede IJ's point that he looks better on paper, but I still think, barring injury, Drew will earn his keep.
good to see him coming home.Andy Pettitte baby!!!! woooh!!!!
It feels like it's 1996 again, I'm loving this...
The left-hander and the Yankees have reached an agreement on a one-year deal that will pay him $16 million in 2007 with a player option for 2008, sources close to the negotiations told ESPN The Magazine's Buster Olney on Friday.
The player option for 2008 is also at $16 million. Pettitte must pass a physical for the agreement to be finalized.
the ironic thing is that have of those debts are to pay for Bonds.I think the attendance is a big factor too. The privately-financed ballpark might not sell out if a Bonds-less Giants team performs poorly. They've got debt payments to make.
ATLANTA -- While confirming the club's interest in obtaining Rocco Baldelli from the Devil Rays, a Braves source has provided indication that they are willing to provide some top prospects to complete this transaction.
During this week's Winter Meetings at Walt Disney World's Swan and Dolphin Resort, the Devil Rays are believed to have asked that left-handed starter Chuck James be included in the potential deal. But the Braves are very reluctant to trade the 25-year-old southpaw, who is coming off an 11-win rookie season.
The Braves want Baldelli, a 25-year-old outfielder, to serve as their leadoff hitter and starting left fielder this year. If Andruw Jones were to exit via free agency at the end of the 2007 season, Baldelli would become the club's center fielder of the future.
His current contract includes three club options that run through the end of the 2011 season. The maximum annual salary that he'd earn would be $9 million. Given the success he's had in his first three big-league seasons, he could become one of the game's top bargains.
MLB.com has learned that the interest in Baldelli is great enough that the Braves have at least opened themselves to the thought of including top catching prospect Jarrod Saltalamacchia in these trade offers. They also would be willing to include shortstop Yunel Escobar, who opened a lot of eyes while hitting .407 to win the batting crown in the Arizona Fall League.
But the Devil Rays are expected to demand that a starting pitcher be included. Thus, instead of James, the Braves may need to include right-handed starter Kyle Davies, whose promising future was clouded by the groin injury that caused him to miss 3 1/2 months of the 2006 season.
Andy Pettitte baby!!!! woooh!!!!
It feels like it's 1996 again, I'm loving this...
Looks like he's earning the title of being called "the real commissioner of baseball" or "baseball's most hated man".And Eric Gagne signs with Texas, after being offered what sounded like a better deal by the Dodgers. Is Scott Boras becoming one of the most despised agents in baseball?