Not surprised by this.
I don't work in the cell business, so I can't confirm. I'm a little curious why, but can't say that I'm totally surprised by that, either.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Mobile Roaming Charges Abolished in the EU
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Not surprised by this.
I don't work in the cell business, so I can't confirm. I'm a little curious why, but can't say that I'm totally surprised by that, either.
You keep voting on an issue, you will eventually get the outcome you like.
The next move needs to be making it unlawful to lock a phone to a particular network. That law needs to go into effect all across planet Earth. It's such an archaic, greedy, controlling way of doing things that makes life difficult for many, many people.
If you want to keep my business that badly... earn it.
If you want to keep my business that badly... earn it.
Thank your carrier who is taking advantage of the situation. My carrier lowered prices actually. But I guess that’s the British thing to do, blame the EU for everything.
Absolutely!
I think Three is the only network with unlocked phones…
http://ee.co.uk/help/add-ons-benefi...going-abroad/roaming-costs/countries/portugal
Look at the bottom or call EE to be sure. Maybe your link is now dated.
Are you talking about the EU which is forcing terrorism and multiculturalism upon people who don't want it? That's right. EU now sueing Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic for not letting in terrorist into their countries. That's right. That's the great elite EU you are talking about. Destroying Europe from the inside.
Yes, it does. I have it set to search network manually. But oftentimes I need to cross the border and I need to select the neighboring country's network which is a hassle.
But what you said is not a concern. If you connect with the network of your home country at least once a day, then you should not have anything to worry about.
[doublepost=1497533655][/doublepost]
Strange. My carrier just increased my data plan from 12GB to 16GB free of additional costs. Perhaps your company is just scapegoating to get some extra pennies.
Well there's more hardware and software to maintain, to handle the billing and VLR. Then inter-network traffic will probably incur a higher cost as well, especially internationally. And at the very least, making agreements and handling software/hardware issues with networks in foreign countries is in itself a more costly thing.
There's no free lunch here. The networks will not lose money on this. They'll just raise prices.
Think of this measure as the poorer (people who don't travel and don't need roaming) subsidising the richer (people who do travel and use roaming) - like most regulation that seems "social" on some level.
Last edited:
Nope. Major networks will gradually buy smaller ones to get an integrated infrastructure. Raising prices is not very feasible, as competition is very tight.
Some readers are reporting that mobile carriers in certain EU countries have already raised their plan prices, although it's still unclear if this is a direct result of the legislation that came into effect today.
I ink you'll see prices rise as carriers look to recoup the lost roaming money. Those who ram a lot would win since the carriers can spread the price hike across all subscribers. The carriers aren't simply going to eat the lost revenue.
Competition isn't very tight due to the nature of the business, i.e. limited spectrum which is extremely expensive to license.
It used to be that way in the US; until we had consolidation and national carriers emerged.
[doublepost=1497535328][/doublepost]
Not quite, there is a data limit and charges afterward:
Data limits - national bundles with limited data
If you have limited or very cheap mobile data (less than €3.85 / GB in 2017), your operator may apply a "fair use" limit for data when you are roaming. The limit is calculated on the basis of the retail price of your domestic mobile bundle as in the case of unlimited data (above). Your operator must inform you in advance about this limit and will have to alert you when you reach it. Be aware that you can continue data roaming but your operator will apply a surcharge. This surcharge will be the wholesale data cap = €7.70 / GB of data in 2017 plus VAT, €6 / GB plus VAT in 2018. The data cap will decrease further after 2018.
http://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/telecoms-internet/mobile-roaming-costs/index_en.htm
[doublepost=1497536061][/doublepost]
Prevent competition from cheap SIMs. If you could get a cheap SIM from another country and roam 100% of the time in your own country how long would it be before cheap SIMS posed up on eBay and carries found a lot of users buying them simply to get cheap service by abusing roaming? The EU directive includes fair use limits and caps to prevent that; although the cheap SIM companies would probably go out of business if enough uses bought them from abroad simply because the roaming fees that pay the other carrier would exceed the revenue form the plans.
Providers can prevent this by simply not allowing roaming on specific plans; nothing in the directive requires roaming be part of a plan.
Last edited:
On a kind of side note, just think if we'd kept the spectrum nationalised and leased it out to the companies. Prices wouldn't be as high because they wouldn't have had to spend billions getting the licenses and we'd be able to have more competition due to companies like Giff Gaff, Tesco et al being able to lease the spectrum from source rather than piggy backing off the big 4. (This is UK by the way)
That feel when you get informed about this by EE but know it'll only be less than 2 years because more than half your country wanted out of this great thing and can't even figure out how the **** to do it..
For starters, that's exactly what happens - the spectrum IS nationalised and licensed/leased out to companies. The license is not perpetual, in the UK for example is guaranteed only for 20 years.
Secondly, there's a huge amount of physical and software infrastructure required to actually implement the network. Tesco/Giff Gaff etc simply don't have the money and expertise to do this.
Which is why the licenses are awarded to companies that do, they have all sorts of coverage obligations btw which makes the implementation really expensive, and then Tesco/Giff Gaff etc lease service instead of spectrum, which actually works, and works better in the end.
This is a complicated issue because of the inherently limited nature of the resource, unlike many other domains. Not everybody should lease spectrum, there's relatively too little of it.
I like the way the companies are spinning it as "Look what we are doing for you, our customer, out of the goodness of our hearts to make your life better". No mention it's enforced.
Italy and other European countries do have thorough vetting of refugees.
This kind of thinking may seem plausible if you live on a continent that is separated from the rest of the world by oceans. Many refugees don't have papers, and if they do, their home countries in many cases refuse to take them back. So what do you do with refugees arriving on your shores in overcrowded boats? Let them drown?
Huh? What the heck are you talking about?
Most refugees leave their countries because they are fleeing war (e.g. Syria) and/or extreme poverty and famine. Political instability and climate change are primary drivers.
Some carries did it before ( Pay more, if you need it!) That was ok for me (5€, Deutsche Telekom).
Switzerland, nevertheless, is a member of the EEA, so some providers opt to include it into their plans, while others don't. In France, for instance, Orange includes it and Bouygues does not.
Note that some carriers are recouping the costs by raising the rates in areas not covered by the new regulation.
[doublepost=1497539350][/doublepost]
[doublepost=1497539350][/doublepost]
Switzerland is in EFTA, not EEA. EEA is included (eg.: Liechtenstein).