Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No matter how good apple are, you need surface area to cool the internals ;)

----------



My friends 17" couldn't even browse the web without the fans spinning up, and there are countless reports of this.
even my 2009 MBP core2 due gets too hot to have on my lap when converting a DVD.

Lol, lots of 17" MBP's in our offices and you can sure as heck surf the web and do lot's of other tasks without the fans spinning up :rolleyes:
 
There's nothing more versatile and flexible than a home NAS. All my computers get access to the same storage, share files and when I buy a new computer, I don't have any data to move over.
Which is absolutely fine if you only need access to your files at home. Many of us, however, travel. That's the main reason we have a laptop rather than a desktop. I want access to my files wherever I am in the world, not just at home.
 
Which is absolutely fine if you only need access to your files at home. Many of us, however, travel. That's the main reason we have a laptop rather than a desktop. I want access to my files wherever I am in the world, not just at home.

That's what the Internet is for. I have access to all my files at home from anywhere in the world. The NAS does have a configuration for a "default gateway" and thus can access the Internet (and the reverse is true).

Not to mention why would I want to drag along all my data (huge anime collection, pictures, TV series) when I travel and risk losing them due to damaging the laptop or losing it ? That's just ridiculous. They're safer at home and if I really do absolutely have to have a few of them, I can just pull them over the net.

Again, most versatile and flexible solution and safest one to boot.
 
That's what the Internet is for.
When we can get a high-speed wifi connection on long-haul flights ... when we can be in a client meeting and instantly pull up a 2Gb file without having to arrange access to their network ... when every hotel has a 100% reliable high-speed wifi connection that we can count on to give us access to all our files at any time ... when we can access a large file in the back of a cab ... in short, when we have absolutely ubiquitous high-speed broadband worldwide, then you can talk to me about storing my files at home. ;)

Not to mention why would I want to drag along all my data (huge anime collection, pictures, TV series) when I travel and risk losing them due to damaging the laptop or losing it ?
You don't have multiple backups? :eek:
 
When we can get a high-speed wifi connection on long-haul flights ... when we can be in a client meeting and instantly pull up a 2Gb file without having to arrange access to their network ... when every hotel has a 100% reliable high-speed wifi connection that we can count on to give us access to all our files at any time ... when we can access a large file in the back of a cab ... in short, when we have absolutely ubiquitous high-speed broadband worldwide, then you can talk to me about storing my files at home. ;)

Read up on just-in-time manufacturing vs. just-in-case manufacturing. There's a reason the former has become the norm. The same principle applies here.

Your local drive is available for the files you think you will need on your long-haul flight. The NAS is there for files you are unlikely to need right away but still want to have. Wi-Fi has become almost ubiquitous now, and most airlines have pledged to have it available on all their flights within a year or two.
 
Macbook Pro roadmap

Heres how I see it:

NO OPTICAL DRIVE
People who use optical drives on laptops are few and far between, DVDs are outdated and have been superseded by Blu Ray and Digital Downloads. Blu Ray will also become a niche product soon as the quality of Digital Downloads is getting better, and the ability to redownload them once purchased will relinquish the need for a solid copy.

MACBOOK PRO AND MACBOOK REBRANDING
There will be no 13" MacBook Pro, this will be replaced by the 13" Macbook Air. The 13" isn't really a "pro" device, it lacks the power of the larger pro models. The 11 and 13 inch Macbook Airs will be rebranded to MacBooks, and the 15 and 17 inch MacBook Pros will remain MacBook Pros (if Apple continue to produce the 17 inch). This will clean up and simplify Apple's laptop product line.

ONLY FLASH STORAGE
The current "MacBook Air"s will have similar storage options as currently available, but the Macbook Pros will now have the option of 256/512 Flash Storage

DISCRETE GRAPHICS
Optional on the 13 inch, standard on the 15 and 17. More efficient cooling will be implemented for the heat.

THIN ENCLOSURE
Implemented throughout the lineup.

They won't have:

BLU RAY
Physical copies of films are a burden, and a PITA to carry around, and Apple's iTunes Movies will soon be reaching a similar quality, so there is no need for Apple to support it

SSD + HARD DRIVE
Moving Parts = Heat. In a thin enclosure thats (obviously) not good, so only flash storage will be implemented.

FIREWIRE
Theres an adapter for that ;)

GLOSSY DISPLAYS
Who "needs" one anyway?
 
When we can get a high-speed wifi connection on long-haul flights ... when we can be in a client meeting and instantly pull up a 2Gb file without having to arrange access to their network ... when every hotel has a 100% reliable high-speed wifi connection that we can count on to give us access to all our files at any time ... when we can access a large file in the back of a cab ... in short, when we have absolutely ubiquitous high-speed broadband worldwide, then you can talk to me about storing my files at home. ;)

Grab the files you need for the trip before you go, no need to drag everything along, again, that's just dangerous.

You're the one losing out and requiring massive TBs on a laptop, I'm not, so frankly, I won't wait to "talk to you". In fact, I'll just stop after this post and let you live in a world with bounderies I've broken years ago.

You don't have multiple backups? :eek:

I have a backed up NAS at home, why would I need yet another copy on my laptop of everything I have ever acquired/made ? Again, grab and go only what you need, pull up the unpredicted stuff over the Internet.

----------

Your local drive is available for the files you think you will need on your long-haul flight. The NAS is there for files you are unlikely to need right away but still want to have. Wi-Fi has become almost ubiquitous now, and most airlines have pledged to have it available on all their flights within a year or two.

Why would I have a sudden need for a particular 2 GB file I didn't know before leaving while on flight though ? That one puzzles me. Either wait to be at the hotel to pull it or pull it before leaving, why have to do it on a plane ? :confused:

Some people come up with the silliest of scenarios that will probably never happen in real life.

----------

ONLY FLASH STORAGE
The current "MacBook Air"s will have similar storage options as currently available, but the Macbook Pros will now have the option of 256/512 Flash Storage

I hope you have some mucho dinero :

http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Other World Computing/SSDAPE6G480/

480 GB is 1100$ right now for MBAs.
 
Laptop as a portable DVD player? Ugh!

How do you carry all your DVDs around? Do you have one of those folders that zips open with all the little plastic folders inside?

Don't play dumb. If your family's heading out for a weekend you might easily pull a few DVD's with you. Even with boxes they'll neither weigh nor take more space than a few boxer shorts.

The real counterargument would be the availability of a external DVD player.

RGDS,
Pekka
 
Don't play dumb. If your family's heading out for a weekend you might easily pull a few DVD's with you. Even with boxes they'll neither weigh nor take more space than a few boxer shorts.

The real counterargument would be the availability of a external DVD player.

So like you said, just bring an external DVD drive. It's no bigger than 1 extra movie.

And frankly, if the family is heading out, leave the movies at home and just have fun as a family.
 
Heres how I see it:

Many good points. Also some arguments which have no foundation in reality. For example:

DVDs are outdated and have been superseded by Blu Ray and Digital Downloads.

Even though many many commenters here seem to fulfill at least one (in many cases both) of the following criteria:
• primary culture anglo-american
• living in a city
I can assure you that is neither an universal truth, nor even the norm. (Something I sincerely hope Apple does not miss to notice.)

Let's take the example of digital downloads. This scenario is a nice hypothesis, but if neither of the criteria above apply to you, then that is something which really benefits only "the others". The simple fact is that a) sufficient download speeds are not available everywhere (or at a reasonable price) b) your preferred cultural material may not be available at all and at least the breadth of the offering will not satisfy you.

Finally another point:
Let's assume that a consumer might be able to get the same material (movie, tune, other) with the same quality with the same availability (meaning no download speed limitations) for the same price*, would he prefer a digital download or a hardcopy (essentially an optical disc)?

I assume that many consumers would not care one way or the other. Some might prefer the no-hassle approach the digital download offers. But finally a meaningful percentage of consumers would still by the DVD/BR/CD, due to the fact that there is no lock-in.

Just in case you don't catch the meaning of that last sentence: If you own a DVD, you own it, and it's free for you to utilize as long as you have the hardware to play it. Even thought technology gets outdated quicker than before, It's safe to assume you will be able to play it or rip it for another 20 or so years. After that you are still able (although the legality varies by jurisdiction) to extend its lifespan through converting your media into a newer format.
With the "digital download right" you've purchased you are essentially:
a) at the mercy of your content provider and
b) locked in with the content provider you bought it from.

Can you see Apple, Amazon and <insert third party here> settling some deal to enable cross-transferance of "digital download rights".

Which is exactly why I still:
Buy my movies as DVD's
Buy my music as CD's
Buy my books on paper
Purchased a hardcopy of Lion
and
Avoid the Mac App Store whenever possible.

RGDS,
Pekka

* The fact of the matter is that digital downloads are cheaper only when the material is a) new or b) an absolute classic. With DDL's there are no 75% discounts, inventory sales or any of those situations (2nd hand, anybody) where you're able to buy your DVD's for a fraction of the iTunes store's price.
 
Your local drive is available for the files you think you will need on your long-haul flight.
'Think' being the operative word. Some elements of life are predictable, others aren't. More than once, I've been writing a proposal and knew which elements I intended to borrow from previous proposals then had an idea about a different approach. Because I had everything with me, I could pull up the relevant proposals on the flight, not have to wait until I landed.

Wi-Fi has become almost ubiquitous now, and most airlines have pledged to have it available on all their flights within a year or two.
If you think wifi is 'almost ubiquitous', I can only assume you rarely leave the USA.

And airlines have been making that promise for over five years. In a year or two, SSDs will be larger and cheaper so the discussion may be moot. I'm talking about this year.

----------

Grab the files you need for the trip before you go, no need to drag everything along, again, that's just dangerous.
What is this 'danger' exactly? All my key files exist in four different places.

You're the one losing out and requiring massive TBs on a laptop
'Losing out'? When I bought them, the two drives were just under £100 each, so added a premium of 10% to the cost of my MBP.

In fact, I'll just stop after this post and let you live in a world with bounderies I've broken years ago.
Lol - I've been using email since 1983, long before the Internet. I was using online storage in 1984, when access was via a 300-baud modem. You're attempting to teach granny to suck eggs here thanks to the schoolboy error of thinking your own user-case applies to everyone else. I'm sure your approach works for you; my approach works for me.
 
Logical Progression

Ever since Apple announced the first MacBook Air, I always saw this as their strategy going forward.... to use the SSD, no-dvd, thin form-factor. The MacBook Air is just beautiful. Remember when it was $2800? Now the base starts around $1000, good for everyone.
 
Even though many many commenters here seem to fulfill at least one (in many cases both) of the following criteria:
• primary culture anglo-american
• living in a city
I can assure you that is neither an universal truth, nor even the norm. (Something I sincerely hope Apple does not miss to notice.)

Actually, the majority of the world now lives in cities. :)

That said, I think a lot of countries are more connected than the US. South Korea and Finland come to mind. I've heard that cellular connections in China are more reliable than in the US, and if you have used AT&T in NYC (or Sprint or T-Mobile), you won't find that hard to believe. Many emerging markets with sub-par land lines and physical connections are "skipping" right to wireless telephony and broadband.

Apple tends to push the envelope on certain things. Dropping optical drives in 2012 isn't quite the same as dropping the floppy in 1998 (everyone knew back then it was dead technology, but Apple was the first with the guts to actually declare it dead, sort of like the emperor's new clothes). However, it's getting more and more like that. Microsoft is releasing a Windows app store, and their Windows On ARM devices will rely on it as the exclusive source of software. Google's whole business model is driven by the Cloud. It makes sense for Apple to be doing the same.

In some respects, computing is coming full circle, with our devices becoming enhanced terminals rather than the digital hubs they were in the 1990s and 2000s.

----------

'Think' being the operative word. Some elements of life are predictable, others aren't. More than once, I've been writing a proposal and knew which elements I intended to borrow from previous proposals then had an idea about a different approach. Because I had everything with me, I could pull up the relevant proposals on the flight, not have to wait until I landed.

Yes, but business proposals don't take up a lot of space. We aren't filling up our 2TB drives with Excel files or Keynote presentations. We are filling them with digital media.
 
It doesn't require built-in Ethernet. I use Ethernet only when at work and I rarely drag my MBA to work with me. I usually work from home with it or on the go where I use Wi-fi or Bluetooth for connectivity.

----------



There's nothing more versatile and flexible than a home NAS. All my computers get access to the same storage, share files and when I buy a new computer, I don't have any data to move over.

Seriously, I've been running this setup since about 2007. Works like a charm, I'm not ever going back to local storage in my computers.


Try moving .iso video files around without a decent LAN data-rate then opine on the subject of the lack of built-in Ethernet.
I too have used a NAS for data storage for a while (with a local SSD for OS files), works fine but only with a GbLAN.
 
In Beijing or Shanghai, sure; in Xi'an or any of the rural areas, not so much.


You are behind the times. All of my business proposals are multimedia.

True, you can embed video, but how large are your typical presentations? I'm guessing most don't have 2 hours of HD video like a movie.

As for China, I've heard that they get decent coverage out in the sticks. It's a matter of national pride.
 
SSD + HARD DRIVE
Moving Parts = Heat. In a thin enclosure thats (obviously) not good, so only flash storage will be implemented.

FIREWIRE
Theres an adapter for that ;)

No. Non-user swappable drives suck especially if you've got tons of stuff you need on you right now or your needs grow beyond the original 256/512 GBs.

Until the price of Thunderbolt storage drops dramatically Firewire is still the way to go for on the go portable storage. Adapters just make things more inconvenient and would most likely cost $50 a pop.
 
----------

[/COLOR]

Why would I have a sudden need for a particular 2 GB file I didn't know before leaving while on flight though ? That one puzzles me. Either wait to be at the hotel to pull it or pull it before leaving, why have to do it on a plane ? :confused:

Some people come up with the silliest of scenarios that will probably never happen in real life.

----------



I hope you have some mucho dinero :

http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Other World Computing/SSDAPE6G480/

480 GB is 1100$ right now for MBAs.

Fair enough, but the MacBook Pro is a premium product, and if people have to pay for it, I'm sure they will.

----------

Many good points. Also some arguments which have no foundation in reality. For example:



Even though many many commenters here seem to fulfill at least one (in many cases both) of the following criteria:
• primary culture anglo-american
• living in a city
I can assure you that is neither an universal truth, nor even the norm. (Something I sincerely hope Apple does not miss to notice.)

Let's take the example of digital downloads. This scenario is a nice hypothesis, but if neither of the criteria above apply to you, then that is something which really benefits only "the others". The simple fact is that a) sufficient download speeds are not available everywhere (or at a reasonable price) b) your preferred cultural material may not be available at all and at least the breadth of the offering will not satisfy you.

Finally another point:
Let's assume that a consumer might be able to get the same material (movie, tune, other) with the same quality with the same availability (meaning no download speed limitations) for the same price*, would he prefer a digital download or a hardcopy (essentially an optical disc)?

I assume that many consumers would not care one way or the other. Some might prefer the no-hassle approach the digital download offers. But finally a meaningful percentage of consumers would still by the DVD/BR/CD, due to the fact that there is no lock-in.

Just in case you don't catch the meaning of that last sentence: If you own a DVD, you own it, and it's free for you to utilize as long as you have the hardware to play it. Even thought technology gets outdated quicker than before, It's safe to assume you will be able to play it or rip it for another 20 or so years. After that you are still able (although the legality varies by jurisdiction) to extend its lifespan through converting your media into a newer format.
With the "digital download right" you've purchased you are essentially:
a) at the mercy of your content provider and
b) locked in with the content provider you bought it from.

Can you see Apple, Amazon and <insert third party here> settling some deal to enable cross-transferance of "digital download rights".

Which is exactly why I still:
Buy my movies as DVD's
Buy my music as CD's
Buy my books on paper
Purchased a hardcopy of Lion
and
Avoid the Mac App Store whenever possible.

RGDS,
Pekka

* The fact of the matter is that digital downloads are cheaper only when the material is a) new or b) an absolute classic. With DDL's there are no 75% discounts, inventory sales or any of those situations (2nd hand, anybody) where you're able to buy your DVD's for a fraction of the iTunes store's price.

I actually totally agree with what your saying about it not being the norm, and that people do want hard copies, but Apples way isn't to listen to what people want, its to tell people what they want. Hence why we don't have Blu Ray on mac (as much as I'd want it)
 
True, you can embed video, but how large are your typical presentations? I'm guessing most don't have 2 hours of HD video like a movie.
They vary a lot, but too big to conveniently download via 3G.

As for China, I've heard that they get decent coverage out in the sticks.
See, that's the difference: you're referring to something you've heard, I'm referring to what I've actually experienced during several visits to China.
 
No. Non-user swappable drives suck especially if you've got tons of stuff you need on you right now or your needs grow beyond the original 256/512 GBs.

Until the price of Thunderbolt storage drops dramatically Firewire is still the way to go for on the go portable storage. Adapters just make things more inconvenient and would most likely cost $50 a pop.

Totally true, but I think it will likely be like the current MacBook Air, where you can actually switch out and upgrade the Flash storage.

Adapters are inconvenient, yes, but not everyone uses Firewire, and I could see apple simplifying the laptop itself, and expecting people to use an adapter or docking to a Thunderbolt display for Firewire support
 
I think you have said this a few times in this thread. And it is honestly a load of bull.

It is bull. The whole point to the initial statement to begin with was simply saying "the ODD is a dinosaur, it needs to be removed" is about the most ignorant reason one can give for removing it, where valid reasons actually exist to do so (nevermind that Apple would never do it for any of them). Hence me offering up a similarly stupid thing to say such as "we should remove UNIX and replace it with a newer OS underbelly" as comparison. This comparison seems to have been lost on a lot of people, so I'll just drop it.

Optical media (in Macs) has seen no major changes or enhancements. The DVD and CD of today are much like they were years ago. Even Blu-ray isn't picking up traction. I think the death of optical media has much to do with moving away from a reliance on mechanical mechanisms in computing, but also more reusable forms of distribution.

Blu-Ray is picking up as much traction as any new format at its age is. Pending actual data to back this up, I'd say more BluRay movies have been purchased than movies from the iTunes Store. You can't get BluRay quality video-on-demand yet as 720P is still the most economical (in terms of bandwidth and drive space) format of online High-Definition content.



Unix on the other hand has seen many substantial improvements over time. If Unix had not been changed and enhanced over time it would be living with Windows 95 right about now and the internet would be run on a different platform.

As a technician, I can tell you that you'd be surprised at how many changes these Mac optical drives have actually gone through. Mind you they do nothing but comply with the anorexia that Apple's engineers seem to impose on their portables and fix the problems caused therein. But to say that no substantial improvements are happening there is kind of...well...wrong. In any event, you're taking the comparison that I made in response to one of the more ignorant comments made in the favor of the death of the ODD more seriously than even it was intended.

In other words, "old" in this case has some additional ideas packed in. Not just age but also relevancy and progress. CD and DVDs (and optical media in general) are simply not as relevant today as they were even just a few years ago and there has been no significant advancements in optical media that warrants its continued usage.

The argument of "if it isn't being advanced, it should be tossed" is not a good one. FireWire has seen many advances past IEEE 1394b (FireWire 800), yet Apple hasn't used a single one, nor will they. FireWire was primarily used for Target Disk Mode and DV camera editing; now Target Disk Mode can just as easily be used via Thunderbolt, and DV cameras that use FireWire are all but extinct. Now please point me in the direction of the forums where people all say "get rid of the FireWire Port, it's old and we don't use it!" I'd make the same case with Ethernet, but I don't think I need to and if I do, then it's a futile argument to even have.

We're talking about trends, declining technologies, and surfacing technologies, and all the rumors and directions are pointing that the MBP will ditch it soon enough.

If you follow the trends OF rumors, you'll know that large sweeping rumors like "The MacBook Pro line will merge with the MacBook Air line" and "All MacBook Pros will become ultra-mobile" tend to and probably will only end up meaning that Apple will announce the rumored-about 15" MacBook Air and that there will be overlap between the two lines.

That being said, the MacBook Air is an ultra-portable laptop; an "ultrabook" if you will. Many companies make ultrabooks. But all of them don't JUST make ultrabooks. Just because the MacBook Air dominates the spotlight, doesn't mean it's going to take over Apple's laptop line.

If by "soon enough" you mean this year, I'd wager actual money against that. I'll happily eat my words if I'm wrong.

The built-in optical drive will be touted, much like Ethernet and FireWire 800, as a high-end feature only for those who need it before it finally disappears from all Macs. The 17" MacBook Pro will find itself the only portable Mac with it before it's gone from the line altogether. At the very least, if we're talking about trends, I'd wager EVERYONE uses their optical drive more than their ExpressCard slot.

Like I told you before, from many discussions ago, that Apple would ditch the white Macbook, but you were too adamant and too blind to see that they wouldn't. I really don't think your foresight is quite good if you cannot see the trends developing right in front of you.

And I said that they wouldn't due to the education market, hence it lingering even post-discontinuation for as long as it did.

I actually do see the trend of optical media disappearing believe it or not, but given that I don't foresee all BluRays and DVDs disappearing within this (or even the next) calendar year, and given that software (yes, even Mac software) is still predominantly sold on discs and in stores, I think it's safe to say that Apple won't pull the optical drive from every portable machine it has this calendar year. In 2015, sure. Not today and not tomorrow.

Nope, more common? No one will take you seriously if you cannot provide your argument with data to prove that people who use the ODD are more common at all.

Right, like you telling me that the MacBook Air is Apple's best selling computer without providing any data to support that claim is any different. Oh, hi pot, I'm kettle, did you know that we're both black?:rolleyes:

I work in IT. I live and breathe it, even when I don't want to and would rather be out drinking with the friends or doing something else. I have surveyed a plethora of people on this matter, and with one or two real-life exceptions, most use their optical drive very seldom, but would still be upset to see it gone and would never buy a machine without one. Case in point: none of them would ever consider a MacBook Air and the mobile-Mac-prefering among them always default to a MacBook Pro.

I've given my side of the data, and thats an easy one: the Macbook Air is the best selling Mac product, and it does not have an ODD, and thats where real data about real trends happen: in the sales numbers, not the trivial complaints you find and read here on MR. Furthermore, why do you think starting this CES 2012, this has been called the year of the "ultrabook"? Why do you think Intel, Asus, HP, and Dell are all now trying to copy Apple and jump on the super thin, light-weight notebook aesthetic that does not include an ODD?

The Ultrabook craze is no different from the Netbook craze. They're all crazes and much like the Netbook craze, the Ultrabook craze will eventually die down. Once the costs go below $999, Ultrabooks will be replacing traditional notebooks for users whose notebooks are given to them and managed by their IT departments. For all other users (gamers, digital artists, mobile video editors, Pro audio people), the traditional notebook will stick around as the Ultrabook is a poor solution for those people. See Steve Jobs' now-famous "truck analogy".

Come on, stop being so defensive and emotional about a technology, just because you think its inconvenient for you and others to use. Look at the industry as a whole, and not to yourself and a few others anecdotes on this forum.

I don't take others anecdotes on this forum at all seriously. Nor do I see any reason to. I am being no less unreasonable than anyone else on here, I just happen to have a differing opinion and not be in love with the MacBook Air or things about it.

And really, just because the Macbook Pro has a "Pro" in it's name, you don't think consumers are buying these models too?

They absolutely are. I'm a consumer and I'll be buying one. But Pro tends to mean "More features than the other models", which is entirely why I'll be buying a MacBook Pro and not a MacBook Air. That being said, I expect the MacBook Pro line to offer features that stand apart from the MacBook Air as they each fill two entirely different needs.

Obvious is obvious? Uh, it tells me that was the past. I'm talking about the future. What was the purpose of pointing that out? :confused:

You said that Apple is moving in that direction as the Mac mini no longer has the optical drive after its 2011 refresh. I made the counter-point that the MacBook Pro still has its optical drive after both of its 2011 refreshes, the latter of which took place AFTER the Mac mini refresh, which to me is a clear indication that it'll stick around this next refresh, whether you or others think it should go away or not. Apple doesn't listen to the MR community, it acts on its own volition.

So your argument is "UNIX is older"? :rolleyes:

No, my argument is that killing the optical drive because it is "old" is the worst reason to do so. I don't want it gone personally, as I really don't want to have to tie up my WiFi network using remote disc to install the gigabytes of Adobe software that I just bought onto the MacBook Pro that I'm going to buy at the refresh, but even I can come up with much better reasons for its demise. "Old" is a weak argument, hence the point about UNIX, which shouldn't go away anytime soon, though I guess that analogy wasn't picked up by many.
 
Last edited:
If the rumors are true, I won't be buying any further Apple laptops. If I can't watch my DVDs on a long plane or car ride, then I might as well just read a book. And don't tell me to just watch Netflix streaming. The quality and quantity of the available titles is EXTREMELY lacking, IMHO.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.