Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'd rather they keep the size the same, and make an "iPhone Pro", where we can have features like 3G modem tethering, stereo bluetooth headphones, etc.

Y'know, some of the same features my current, 2 year old Windows Mobile smartphone can do now.
 
iphone nano is coming out but it will not have safari or mail. it will have ipod feature and embrace app store.

If you want to surf the net then the iphone nano will not be for you

Not so fast!. It will have a Wifi bridge mode where, you whip out your iPod Touch or Gen1 iPhone and use Wifi to access the carrier 3G HSPA data channel. They want to feed off the usage cost off the carriers with their revenue model, remember ?. I just hope the battery life is decent or they have piggyback "double power" battery modules of $50 extra (yeah, rip off and thats the Apple we know).

This device will be small enough (hopefully) for me to carry as a spare rather than piggyback a spare iPhone with me...:D:apple::apple::apple:
 
Not terribly excited about this. I'm sure that there's some way that Apple would bypass the size issue but I wouldn't be overly thrilled to use it.
 
Screen: My guess is that it will have the same resolution but a smaller screen.
Data/internet: No 3G, only EDGE and Wi-Fi.
Keyboard: Landscape mode and a new portrait mode.
Plans/Tariffs: Pay as you go and contracts will be available. Maybe Unlocked?
 
This is awful

come on apple.

If this is true, i will officially kill myself.

They have released many revisions of the iphone/touch already.
Why another...
-Sam:apple::apple::rolleyes:
 
If this comes unlocked, plan on Apple making a boatload of cash. I just wonder how they're gonna pull that off without MMS.

But the bigger story here is this: if the iPhone nano is indeed coming, likely at Macworld, why isn't Steve Jobs going to announce it? If this is true, this is a huge announcement and you would figure he'd want to make it. Unless it's not coming out during Macworld....
 
If you want to be suprised on Christmas stop looking for your presents early, like wise, if you want to be suprised on new releases stop reading rumor sites :p

that's impossible. sometimes i just open up Digg.com or CNN.com and skim the headlines. what happens when i read a headline titled "iPhone Nano coming out!"?

spoiled i say...the internet strips us all of our dignity.
 
Nano, no problem

What could they take out to make a nano size phone? For the sake of software, the screen MUST remain the same number of pixels, though it could be physically smaller. The CPU must remain the same with the same speed.

They could take out the GPS and the WiFi. They could take out the 3G. This reduces size and power, allowing them to use a smaller battery. They could take off the black top and bottom sections, leaving the front literally all screen. They might go plastic over the screen instead of glass, for weight reduction. And that's about it, but that should be enough.

Removing WiFi is acceptable as long as you can use the iTunes and App stores over the cellular network. They might reduce the size limit from 10MB to 5MB for over the air purchases.

Now you have a smaller, lighter unit that runs all the very same software, has almost all the same features (no GPS but still location manager is there like in the first gen iPhone), and it could be significantly cheaper. But who cares the price, that never bothered me because it is nothing compared to the enormous $70/month you pay to those robbers at ATT.
 
Why stop at Nano. Why not an iPhone Shuffle? No screen, integrated iPod functionality similar to iPod Shuffle, randomly calls friends in your Addressbook...
 
I like the nano concept, I hope it's pay-as-you-go. I'm happy with my iPod Touch and Pay-as-you-go crappy flip-phone combo. The only thing that would make me happier is if my crappy pay-as-you-go flip-phone had OTA synching of contacts and calendar events from my Mac and iPod. Manual entry, pfft. A pay-as-you-go iPhone Nano with address book synching... I'd buy it in a second. Don't need the apps or the web surfing, that's what the ipod is for.

This is awful
come on apple.
If this is true, i will officially kill myself.
They have released many revisions of the iphone/touch already.
Why another...
-Sam:apple::apple::rolleyes:

Now where would we be if we all killed ourselves every time somebody tried to sell a product we didn't like? Assuming the human race survived Ladas, radios with moving pictures on them (bizzare!), Hummers, the movie Ishtar, and single-ply toilet paper, Apple would have lost 3/4 of their supporters when they announced that ridiculous music player concept of theirs back in aught-one, dagnabbit.
 
I just really don't see a Nano iPhone as being practical. What about apps already designed with the full screen real estate in mind? The screen can get small enough as it is. I know personally a smaller screen would greatly hinder the performance. Would it really have the same specs and be cheaper? I would think if they shrunk everything in the iPhone down that it would cost MORE. Smaller and slower processor? I hope not. The phone is laggy enough as it is with the UI and some apps.
 
If Apple releases a $50 phone, with similar features to the iPhone, they will absolutely dominate the cell phone market.
 
I am looking forward to finding out what makes the nano a nano other than size. Hopefully they won't take too much functionality away. I wouldn't mind losing the iPod functionality if I could retain the web browsing and apps. That might make it the perfect companion to the iPod nano.
 
I am looking forward to finding out what makes the nano a nano other than size. Hopefully they won't take too much functionality away. I wouldn't mind losing the iPod functionality if I could retain the web browsing and apps. That might make it the perfect companion to the iPod nano.

That doesn't make any sense. Why would they remove a software functionality that affects nothing? It will pretty much be all hardware concessions.
 
If this is true, is it something that the FCC wants to approve 6 months early or is Apple pass that now?
 
That doesn't make any sense. Why would they remove a software functionality that affects nothing? It will pretty much be all hardware concessions.

True, but perhaps they will reduce the storage. You could have a cheap phone that holds quite a few apps with 1GB, but it wouldn't be much of an iPod. It seems to me at the moment the storage is one of the biggest costs involved.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.