I totally agree with you. Apple controls the quality of the device and the software it runs. I have a MacBook Air for the times when I travel. It's small and light and works as an adjunct for my iMac. The iPad would fit the role just as well at a third of the cost. I see the iPad as a great device to have around the house, to pick it up to read the paper, a magazine, a book or just to check my e-mail. I can walk out on my deck to continue the experience without even thinking about it. Eventually the price will drop and we will all have this device to do a lot of things around where we live. This is merely the first iteration of a new way of doing things.Well, because people just want it all. Some things just take time. Apple makes choices that are practical for their products, and to keep people from shooting themselves in the foot. Believe or not, it's more important for Apple to create flimsy apps like Pages then a USB port. They need to market a way to use this device productively, or create an illusion of it. And a USB port? That's what itunes is for. I know, it's the Apple cult. But it's worth it and makes the integration of their products more tighter in the long run. This makes them the company they are.
I love all my Apple products. I don't use all their software apps because some are not for serious work. Now there are a number of people on here that will agree with that. Put those aside and use what you want.
The only 'negative' comment I have is the MacBook Air. I just don't get that product. But that me. And I don't own one.
With so many people fixated on hardware, software and network, features and benefits, I would like to see posts and threads about LIFESTYLE CHANGES and things that heretofor were impractical or inconvenient without an iPad.
This will tell real people in real terms, "What's this thing good for?"
Just Rocketman
Needs one for initial setup.
Very good question, this is why I am waiting for the content I need to be available. But if all works according to plan, the iPad will:
-make newspapers cheaper and easier on the environment (and keep me from freezing while trying to get the newspaper out of the driveway in a snowstorm, or forgetting to put it on hold and have to buy it twice when I travel). Even without the cold, on $ this pays for the iPad in five years.
-make books cheaper and easier on the environment
-make magazines cheaper and easier on the environment (if the magazine publishers get over themselves and the notion that they can continue to charge the consumer the same newsstand price and pocket the printing and transport savings)
-make traveling easier, instead of carrying 1 laptop, 1 iPod, 2 chargers, 2 paperbacks and 2 magazines through airport security 1 iPad + 1 charger is a dream
-Save desk space in homes (most homes only need 1 Desktop/laptop for heavy work and would be better off with 1 or more iPads for communication and entertainment)
-Allow you to do all that communicating and entertaining from the comfort of the couch. Instead of having each family member in their room on their computer or watching tv, now everyone can be together. They may still ignore each other but they will at least be in one room![]()
Note, all of these lifestyle conveniences are "wants" instead of "needs" and Apple may have a slow go of it pushing this technology in a recession (though if you are an environmentalist maybe they are "needs")
Actually, the lack of Flash is a feature!
I name it? Okay: pr0n & advertising. There's 90% of Flash right there.
Heh, you can bet Flash will be drying up sooner rather than later (once these large iPad sales take their toll). After all, advertisers don't want to miss out on potential customers who so easily spend their cash on such (purportedly) frivolous devices.![]()
Flash is not drying up soon. To many Windows users and non iPhone, iPad users. When iPad users (non Apple) find out that a lot of websites cannot be accessed on iPad then they will start to see that it's just a big iPhone with out the phone.
If Flash is so bad on Mac's why doesn't Apple remove it from all Apple products? That's the only way to kill flash.
If you surf the net and can't view a site on your iPhone or iPad what are you going to do? Go to your desktop and surf the web. To the average user they see the iPad or iPhone as not being able to access site in Flash.....not the other way around.
HP Slate will be the iPad alternative to those who want what the iPad cant do.
Flash is not drying up soon. To many Windows users and non iPhone, iPad users. When iPad users (non Apple) find out that a lot of websites cannot be accessed on iPad then they will start to see that it's just a big iPhone with out the phone.
What about things iPad can and HP can't?
Which is still a big thing.
You really don't get it, do you? Mobile devices like phones and iPads are a MAJOR growth area in the next 1-3 years. The logic of economics is going to compel sites to take this into account. If Adobe isn't going to optimize it for handhelds, then sites will put up dual versions to cater to handhelds.
The existence of a feature means nothing if it's not usable for a device. Being power and resource hungry is tolerable on a laptop. It will not be on handhelds.
And when you find out what HTML5 is about (try that googly thing), then perhaps you'll realize that "Apple versus Adobe" isn't all there is to this issue.Flash is not drying up soon. To many Windows users and non iPhone, iPad users. When iPad users (non Apple) find out that a lot of websites cannot be accessed on iPad then they will start to see that it's just a big iPhone with out the phone.
The reason it matters on iPhones and iPads is primarily battery drain and lack of support for the touch UI.If Flash is so bad on Mac's why doesn't Apple remove it from all Apple products? That's the only way to kill flash.
The iPhone has been around since 2007... and perhaps that provides some indication of how naive and meaningless your questions are at this point. But if truly interested... then why don't you ask all 15 gazillion of the iPhone (and iPod touch) users out there?If you surf the net and can't view a site on your iPhone or iPad what are you going to do? Go to your desktop and surf the web. To the average user they see the iPad or iPhone as not being able to access site in Flash.....not the other way around.
And when you find out what HTML5 is about (try that googly thing), then perhaps you'll realize that "Apple versus Adobe" isn't all there is to this issue.
The reason it matters on iPhones and iPads is primarily battery drain and lack of support for the touch UI.
The iPhone has been around since 2007... and perhaps that provides some indication of how naive and meaningless your questions are at this point. But if truly interested... then why don't you ask all 15 gazillion of the iPhone (and iPod touch) users out there?
[hint: YouTube comes standard on all models.]
And of course, HTML5 will not have support for touch and will cause exactly the same battery drain but somehow it's OK.
And of course, HTML5 will not have support for touch and will cause exactly the same battery drain but somehow it's OK.
No flash, no multitasking, no thanks.
It's a giant iPod Touch
i love to see apple fan's.
No usb, no flash. Can't share internet from my phone (buy the 3g version and pay the acess to web...) Can't view the websites correctly. Can't share a file that i created to a simple usb pen, i doubt that camera kit will allow share to a pen drive.
Every device have usb, everybody uses usb to share files, my car have usb to listen music what a well apple?
The next step is to remove all the usb and firewire ports from mac's (remember the removal of firewire from macbook) ?......
This is a big ipod touch.
Open your eyes apple is getting the new Microsoft they don't care a damn about users they want to control everything it's all about apple lock in and of course a beautiful design.