I told you I am simple guy, I like a working antenna and a phone that doesn't look like crap, and of course i appreciate aesthetically pleasing consumer items. This phone to me looks like crap, maybe the antenna works though, we shall see. You know what phone I have now, $20 **** phone that does the job after my losing a few iPhones here and there. But it's functional cause I don't mind whatever happens to it. The iPhone on the other hand is a status symbol of banality for pimps, porn stars, starlets etc etc. it's not me saying this, it's the way apple markets it, it's about a large % of people owning iPhones.
But you seem to be too far up...the point you are trying to make to realise what I am saying. It's not about my self esteem, it's about valuing something well designed, that's why the iPhone isn't targeted to people like me who do value good design it's targeted to people who want a status symbol via association, and hence the design is bland, boring, and banal cause that's what a Chinese trophy wife would like to buy. I'd much rather have a **** phone than an iPhone, as I'd much rather have a **** car I don't care bumping than some boring SUV for pimps.
You can laugh all you want but take any designer (and I am not one), or anyway most any designer, people who have a trained and talented eye for aesthetics and ask them how this prototype looks to them, they ll tell you it looks like like crap. It might not look like like crap to you, but then again you might be someone who watches fox news and considers it journalism.