People are crying about 1,810 mAh, like it is a battery going into a phone with tech from 5 years ago, SoC's now are becoming really power efficient with manufacture designs coming out espcially like Moto X's cores and also the move to smaller manufacturer nodes (20nm, 14nm, etc) The 1,810 mAh could be a bigger battery,this is the sacrifice we are all gonna get for that iPod touch like thinness with a synthetic sapphire screen, but if the SoC is 20nm which I think it surely will be and it'll hit speeds in turbo boost modes around 2.0 GHz (ala Intel turbo boost) and its gonna have really good voltage control on 20nm and utilizing the power fully at proper moments
-So a 20 nm SoC that has much better efficiency and power efficiency
-Possible use of DRAM in the screen (new screen tech)
-Very low power contextual core, other dedicated cores to increase power efficiency (like Moto X)
-More power efficient LCD, even with a bigger screen size
-AC wifi (which boosts battery life and less power drain and increased performance)
-Better antenna system which is less battery drain and better cellular service
All this added and iOS 8 software optimizations for the Apple A8 SoC along with a really fast charging solution (ala Qualcomm Quick Charge 2.0 ) to charge that 1,810 mAh battery up real fast, iPhones charge pretty dam fast already and with a new charging solution also, i know the iPhone 6 will have fantastic battery life IF its a move to 20nm node for the A8.
Yes, yes, yes and again, yes! The 5S (I don't know about the 5, I have not had one) is an absolute disgrace in terms of battery life, and good on Samsung for their wall-hugging ads. I am outraged that I spent over £500 on a computer capable of so much to help me through my day, but which I have to keep plugging in or rationing my use of. Do I allow myself to watch the cricket for 30 minutes, or can I use the maps to help me find a decent restaurant? Can I listen to live radio, or should I save the battery in case I am stranded later at Clapham Junction and want to read an eBook with the screen bright enough to be able see it properly?
The pathetic, smug, indulgent nonsense about "super thin" whilst many of us find we can't use this device like the much vaunted Jobs would have wanted makes me sick. It is not the first time I have said this, and usually some Apple-apologist cretins come back with comments like " why don't you buy a battery case" or "why not use your phone less". You couldn't make it up...
Quite honestly, the mind boggles. The 5S is otherwise impressive, to be sure. But its pathetically inadequate battery makes it a daily trial when I am doing anything other than the most basic casual use, and if that is all I wanted from a phone, I would not have bought the 5S. Now, to praise Apple, the battery life they have got out of the MBAs is remarkably impressive.
TL;DR: I've heard plenty of complaining about the battery life not being good enough, but have not heard one person complain that the iPhone is too thick.
Yes, yes, yes and again, yes! The 5S (I don't know about the 5, I have not had one) is an absolute disgrace in terms of battery life, and good on Samsung for their wall-hugging ads. I am outraged that I spent over £500 on a computer capable of so much to help me through my day, but which I have to keep plugging in or rationing my use of. Do I allow myself to watch the cricket for 30 minutes, or can I use the maps to help me find a decent restaurant? Can I listen to live radio, or should I save the battery in case I am stranded later at Clapham Junction and want to read an eBook with the screen bright enough to be able see it properly?
The pathetic, smug, indulgent nonsense about "super thin" whilst many of us find we can't use this device like the much vaunted Jobs would have wanted makes me sick. It is not the first time I have said this, and usually some Apple-apologist cretins come back with comments like " why don't you buy a battery case" or "why not use your phone less". You couldn't make it up...
Quite honestly, the mind boggles. The 5S is otherwise impressive, to be sure. But its pathetically inadequate battery makes it a daily trial when I am doing anything other than the most basic casual use, and if that is all I wanted from a phone, I would not have bought the 5S. Now, to praise Apple, the battery life they have got out of the MBAs is remarkably impressive.
They're saving the higher capacity battery for the iPhone 6s. You know perfectly well that Apple doesn't put all their eggs in one basket.
Plenty of complaints about the iPhone 3G/3GS looking too fat.
I'd be surprised. Especially when it comes to health and sports tracking with gps. That consumes a lot of power and I'd rather had the same thickness as with the 5s paired with 16+ hours on gps.Don't really care about the battery capacity, I care more about the battery life. As long as that is increased, it's fine. I don't think that's impossible, remember the iPad Air in which Apple increased the speed and battery life while reducing the capacity.
Compared to the iPhone 5S, the 6 will have:
- A slightly larger screen (38% larger)
- A slightly larger battery (16% larger)
- A less power hungry SoC (rumoured)
- A less power hungry screen (rumoured)
I think battery life could actually be increased over the 5S substantially.
I'd be surprised. Especially when it comes to health and sports tracking with gps. That consumes a lot of power and I'd rather had the same thickness as with the 5s paired with 16+ hours on gps.
Still hope for a battery case made by apple.
No.
iPhone 5S: 1,550mAH battery; 4.0 inch screen.
iPhone 6: 1800mAH battery; 4.7 inch screen
1800mAH is about 16% more capacity than 1,550mAH
4.7 inch screen is about 14% bigger than 4.0 inch screen.
A8-Processor: Maybe 5% more efficient (real life effect).
End result: Same overall battery life performance (IMO), about 7% better than the 5S.
The 5.5" model on the other hand is going to have hours more battery per charge.
Why do so many people assume that a percentage increase in screen size (16 in your example) results in an exactly equivalent (16) increase in battery usage. This could only happen if the screen used 100% of all battery consumption. It does not.
Bahroo, optimizations are great. Now think about those very same optimizations PLUS a bigger battery.
Over and over, "we" keep trying to spin a relatively smallish battery as a positive with this "but everything else is optimized to be more power efficient" suggestion. That's GREAT! BUT maximum miserly power sipping + bigger battery would yield so much more than maximum miserly power sipping and a mid-range battery.
That's the point. "We" want hardware & software optimizations AND a bigger battery.