Yes, they are scanned, but for your benefit, not to turn you into the cops like the CSAM scanner. Huge difference, so much so, that it really doesn't apply.Your photos are already scanned. Think about it, go to the photos app and type a name of some your contacts. The photos apps should show you photos with those people. Type tree, dog, cat, pet, food etc. etc. etc.. The photos apps shows pictures of whatever you are searching for. This is not new to iOS 15. This feature has been enabled for a few versions of iOS. I get your point about CSAM but that's not what you've stated in your posts. And now with iOS 15, type in a word that's on a document in the search field, and if it's in a photo it will show in your results. Photos are already scanned.
Wealthy companies don’t take risks?The backlash and legal liability it would open Apple to if one of the worlds richest consumer focused companies lied at this scale would be biblical. I treat companies from a legal point of view - i.e. liability. I think the probability is far more likely to trust the giant company that says 'hey we are selling privacy and don't make money from selling your data' which is obvious from their quarterly earnings vs company that says, hey we are selling your data and here's how much we made by doing that.
I don't treat companies at face value, I treat companies by what's in their best financial interest. Selling privacy allows Apple to club Google/Facebook/Amazon over the head so to speak.
Hard evidence users have no clue about their privacy.
They scan everything. And not just for hashes. They scan content to use it for marketing. Remember, to google, you are more the product than the customer to them.Yeah, if only they knew google has already been doing that for years. As well as scanning all gmail and logging all the Wi-Fi passwords… among other things.
they scanned on your device?
And they supply a service for the data. Its anonymous. Don’t use Google if you don’t want to. They offer a great service. Works well. Rarely issues.They scan everything. And not just for hashes. They scan content to use it for marketing. Remember, to google, you are more the product than the customer to them.
I’m baffled to see a report saying a poll of meagre 1000 people voting means anything. If the number is 100k then I at least can Hope the demographic gets covered decently well. Heck, medical research of COVID variant needs to have 57k cases analysed according to NYTimes!
Guys, do a better job and interview more than just 1000 people. This “report” provides little to no value.
You don’t need more than a thousand to be adequately statistically significant (and there is close to zero difference between eg 1000 and 10000) - no matter how large of a group they represent ?A poll of just over a thousand US internet users. OH, I guess that’s fair, there’s only, what, 4 thousand internet users in the US anyway? Plus, it must be REALLY hard to get more than a thousand internet users to provide their opinion on something. So, this is more than likely the BEST possible outcome.
I don’t think it gets much more clickbaity than this![]()
Anonymous my a**. If you are concerned with privacy and you use google, you are doing exactly the wrong thing. I’m sure google does. And if not, what does it matter, they have all your data anyway.And they supply a service for the data. Its anonymous. Don’t use Google if you don’t want to. They offer a great service. Works well. Rarely issues.
Notice how you ignored the question. Who else scans on device?
I guess we’re ignoring the fact that the above statement (about Apple’s privacy stance being bs) is complete speculation without evidence. Meanwhile you judge other people’s opinions.this is exactly 100% the case.
a lot of people don't seem to realise this, either due to being mis-informed or just plain blinkered with bias.
Well, you may think you’ve confirmed it, at least. But these things need to be held to scientific standards.But my wife and I have run a variety of tests and have confirmed that both iPhones and Android phones listen in on our conversations when they are turned on but not using them.
Right... they are maybe out to get you. But I assume, then, that you don’t own a single Apple device, right?I've been convinced that Apple is a multilayered NSA project, an arm of a shadow (privatized) government, for a very long time.