bokdol said:the question should be when will they support verizon so i can get me one.
Verizon has confirmed that they will get RAZRs afther Thanksgiving sometime. Just wonder if we'll get the iTunes?
bokdol said:the question should be when will they support verizon so i can get me one.
geniusj said:There are upsides and downsides to the US cell phone situation. On the upside (at least vs most the rest of the world), a cell phone is treated the same as any other phone for anyone calling it. We don't pay inflated charges to call a cell phone. Granted, most cell plans charge minutes for incoming calls (not mine, however), but for those of us with free incoming calls, it means that neither side is paying anything extra because one party is on a cell phone. It's quite nice that way. I also have unlimited SMS, so I guess it depends on your provider/plan.
I do realize, however, that our pay as you go plans and locked phones suck![]()
Because that's what the cell phone service providers want. Ultimately, the Cingulars, T-Mobiles, Verizons of the world are the ones buying the phones (not the end user). They want camera phones so that people can spend more money using their networks.oober_freak said:I had a small question for all cell phone companies.. why can't you produce cell phones without cameras?
I mean they can sell a camera as well as a non-camera model of the same phone, can't they? I just hate cell phone cameras..
ftaok said:Because that's what the cell phone service providers want. Ultimately, the Cingulars, T-Mobiles, Verizons of the world are the ones buying the phones (not the end user). They want camera phones so that people can spend more money using their networks.
And of course, the cell phone manufacturers are more than happy to oblige since they can charge more for a phone with a camera than one without.
In the end, the user is the one with less options. It's pretty hard to find a phone without a camera that isn't anything but an entry-level phone.
I'm still hanging onto my Moto v60i because it's a great "phone". Sound clarity is excellent and it holds a great signal.
I intend to do that, and encourage other Verizon customers to switch as well. I don't care how good their service is, when a company tries to steal from you, it's time to stop doing business with them. Direct file transfer is NOT a revenue leak. It is a right, and trying to block that right for unwarranted gain is theft.Misplaced Mage said:Direct file transfer between a phone and a computer without the use of a carrier's network represent a revenue leak that some carriers are more like to plug than others. If you don't like one carrier's stance on phone features, fine, vote with your dollars, go to another carrier, and tell the one you're leaving the reason for your actions.
rockandrule said:Very nice phone, but I'm definitely waiting for an Apple-branded Smart Phone.
jayb2000 said:I have a nice digital camera.
I have an iPod.
I want a good, clear, long lasting, easy to sync, digital phone. If I wanted a little computer I would get a Treo or similar. If I wanted to type with my thumbs I would get psychological help or a blackberry.![]()
BRLawyer said:Charges to receive SMSs in the U.S.? Gosh, I didn't know Bush's land was so far behind the rest of the world....
glowingstar said:no, not the razr.....THIS one:
Mr Maui said:I must say that I still like my Sony Ericsson T68i and would likely use it forever if it weren't for the fact that Cingular is no longer supporting the AT&T phones and the service is starting to go down the tubes since Cingular took over AT&T Wireless. Never had a problem till Sinkular came in.![]()
You could always get the phone and unlock it.QCassidy352 said:No way. I want my cell phone to be good at one thing - calls. And verizon is the best for that (at least all the places I've lived). All the other features - BT, itunes, cameras, nice design, etc. - are cute, but I'd never give up the best network (and hence the most clear and reliable calling) for something with all the bells and whistles that I won't be able to use when I need it.
So I hope verizon does get on board, but I'm sure as heck not leaving them just to have the latest must-have phone.
Yes, and with wackos pushing non-science like "Intelligent Design" into the science curriculum, it isn't likely that we'll be seeing much technical progress in the future.BRLawyer said:Charges to receive SMSs in the U.S.? Gosh, I didn't know Bush's land was so far behind the rest of the world...and I am not talking only about "developed" countries....
caccamolle said:man ! screw the stupid retarded cameras!!!!! lose them !
T-Mobile does if you send an email to your phone.manu chao said:Imagine they charged you for incoming e-mail...
cwtnospam said:I intend to do that, and encourage other Verizon customers to switch as well. I don't care how good their service is, when a company tries to steal from you, it's time to stop doing business with them. Direct file transfer is NOT a revenue leak. It is a right, and trying to block that right for unwarranted gain is theft.
MacTruck said:- Bluetooth technology will be looked upon as the worst wireless tech in history but this will only be said once its replaced.
cwtnospam said:Yes, and with wackos pushing non-science like "Intelligent Design" into the science curriculum, it isn't likely that we'll be seeing much technical progress in the future.
No, at least not soon. Motorola's CDMA phones have little in common with their GSM counterparts under the skin of the housing and user interface. It'll be a complete rewrite, assuming it shows up at all. After all, Verizon already has a music store of its own in the works.JesterJJZ said:Verizon has confirmed that they will get RAZRs afther Thanksgiving sometime. Just wonder if we'll get the iTunes?
dferrara said:Sorry, not everyone is a technocrat. Education is about the exchange of ideas and learning, not restricting curriculum to what you believe is "fact."
I read that this is going to be made by Samsung, so it's crap.spinko said:this is a nice phone from B&O which is very simple... Apple could get some inspiration here. I havn't got one yet because it is expensive..
http://www.bang-olufsen.com/web2/systems/product.asp?section=systems&sub=tp&prodid=562
Not that simple with CDMA phones in North America, I'm afraid, and getting more complicated by the day. First, CDMA phones for the North American market don't use RUIM cards (the CDMA version of a SIM card). Second, Verizon's going to its own, BREW-based user interface, and won't buy phones without it implemented from now on. Sure, you can reprogram the phone with a firmware load for a competitor like AllTel and hack the configuration tables to enable OS-supported features. But Verizon's BREW-based UI can be reprogrammed remotely, i.e., they have the ability to add new features (or replace or remove old ones) without a traditional firmware update at a dealer. And if certain desired features are in the UI code instead of the OS, you're screwed because BREW files are encrypted and digitally signed to the phone they're downloaded to, and won't run on another phone if transfered.Tupring said:You could always get the phone and unlock it.