Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Because a non-WebKit browser app could choose to make any iOS function that is available to apps also available to web applications, which in turn would allow to implement web applications with basically the same functionality and platform integration as native applications. This, in turn, would deprive Apple of revenue from their App Store.
Another explanation - perhaps less cynical - is that Apple is trying to have control over all code that runs on the device in order to provide better security. If browsers are forced to use he Apple engine, all Javascript being loaded by the browser gets run under Apple's control. If browsers use their own engines, Apple loses that control/oversight. You may argue whether Apple actually does any security checking on the Javascript it runs, but you can't argue how controlling code execution can have security benefits. This is also the reason Apple didn't allow the Java VM onto the iOS platform.
Funny thing is Steve Jobs originally never wanted an app store when the iPhone first came out. He wanted everyone to make web-apps instead so he could keep iOS even more locked down. Now the App Store keeps making them so much money that it seems almost insane that he wanted to pass that up
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
mozilla-firefox-banner-fixed.jpg

While support for alternative browser engines sounds like a win for browser companies, Mozilla spokesperson Damiano DeMonte told The Verge that Firefox is "extremely disappointed" with the way Apple is implementing the feature because it does not extend to the iPad.Firefox uses the Gecko engine and could swap to that on the iPhone, but it would need to continue using WebKit on the iPad. According to DeMonte, Apple's implementation of the DMA does not give consumers "viable choices" because it makes it "as painful as possible" for companies to provide alternatives to Safari.
Oh, no! There are unforeseen hardships! Who could have known when EU regulators, who have never had to design, build nor support ANY technology, would have created a set of regulations that would end up with things being worse? Of course, the answer is literally anyone who was paying attention to GDPR :) Even John Gruber at daringfireball.net

The European Commission expected that the GDPR would result in websites prioritizing the privacy of E.U. users — a better web in Europe than elsewhere. Instead, the result was increased user annoyance under a nonstop daily barrage of consent popovers — a worse web in Europe than elsewhere. I suspect the same will prove true of the DMA and mobile platforms.
 
As long as Android and its derivative exist, this talk point will never die. I feel very sorry that Microsoft took way too long to react how important mobile market is. Had windows phone properly took off, Apple might not believe they can just BAU however they like.

Windows Phone was brilliant with how they handled notifications with “tiles” on the main screen.
 
Oh, no! There are unforeseen hardships! Who could have known when EU regulators, who have never had to design, build nor support ANY technology, would have created a set of regulations that would end up with things being worse? Of course, the answer is literally anyone who was paying attention to GDPR :) Even John Gruber at daringfireball.net

The European Commission expected that the GDPR would result in websites prioritizing the privacy of E.U. users — a better web in Europe than elsewhere. Instead, the result was increased user annoyance under a nonstop daily barrage of consent popovers — a worse web in Europe than elsewhere. I suspect the same will prove true of the DMA and mobile platforms.
Whilst you have a point - if you can’t see that this is apples doing then I’m afraid you’re being somewhat shortsighted.
 
This is another reason why people having mixed feelings about iPads presently because its seems like iPadOS is gong no where as fast as iOS. Like when Classical came out it was iOS and using it on a iPad didn't allow for the larger display to be used effectively with its more involved interface of artwork. Instead you just enlarged a IOS app to grow in size. :rolleyes:

So here is this alternative browser support example again being centered around the iOS so making iPadOS users 2nd class citizens once more. Give us some love Apple?
I would disagree with that - the iPad is going just fine, despite the lack of any competition - and that not really being because Apple did something amazing, but because everyone else seemed to forgor about tablets in the mid-10s until it was too late to counter Apple effectively.

The distinction for the EU is probably that they mandated phones, and that does not include tablets. They really should have better anticipated the shenanigans Apple would pull.
 
It's amazing how many people don't understand what they have/haven't been using

(Safari skins, not actual other browsers)

It explains so much of the rest of the uninformed commentary around all things Apple
And how effective and powerful Apple PR has been on various issues involving them. It’s just terrifying to even think about it. Thankfully some judges and regulators don’t buy all of their PR stunt and EU took the lead.

For the record, Firefox has been so inconsequential, they desperately need to penetrate more of mobile user base to improve their engine and have more exposure.
 
Oh, no! There are unforeseen hardships! Who could have known when EU regulators, who have never had to design, build nor support ANY technology, would have created a set of regulations that would end up with things being worse? Of course, the answer is literally anyone who was paying attention to GDPR :) Even John Gruber at daringfireball.net

The European Commission expected that the GDPR would result in websites prioritizing the privacy of E.U. users — a better web in Europe than elsewhere. Instead, the result was increased user annoyance under a nonstop daily barrage of consent popovers — a worse web in Europe than elsewhere. I suspect the same will prove true of the DMA and mobile platforms.
Free plug for the iOS app “Hush Nag Blocker”, which blocks said GDPR cookie pop-ups on EVERY website.

It’s ridiculous we need an extension to block a legally required notice because it ruins the user experience.
 
They’ve spent years carefully crafting and cultivating a nice system, and instead of responding properly to the new rules, they are chucking their toys out of the pram. iOS and iPadOS share apps, and suddenly, overnight, that only works in certain circumstances and in certain parts of the world. Talk about cutting the nose off to spite the face.
 
Apple also has a promoted privacy and security and these laws undermine that. If you disagree buy an android phone. I trust Apple over these other companies any day of the week.

How? You can choose not to use the 3rd party app store and the laws do JACK to change anything.
You can choose to not leave the walled garden and again it does not affect you.

If you you think the app store keeps you safe then I have some magic beans to sell you. Remember the apple App reviewers are little more than trained monkeys poking around on the app. The real security is OS level and those requires an app reviewer or no review is gong to change that.
Remember they are trained monkey's reviewing the app so anything that is against the rules can be remotely turned off so never pops up.

So you are repeating FUD. Your entire argument is FUD.
 
It would be interesting if Chinese government follows suite and demand the same. Apple would have no choice but to comply, and they cannot even use the same talking point much publicly in China, otherwise they’d lose 20% of their revenue stream immediately.
Which makes one wonder, of ALL the countries to enact something so draconian (we’re going to fine you not based on what you make IN the region, but based on what you make WORLDWIDE), why was it the EU? What makes the EU more power hungry in this area than China which has a similar iPhone market percentage (20-30%) but, even knowing all of the things they’re known for, they still didn’t go as far as the EU?
 
Such a tired retort to frustrations with Apple
Maybe but Apple was upfront about what it is about. There were no surprises. Some people like myself bought an iPhone for those very reasons. I don’t want the Wild West of Android with all the malware, virus and security problems that come with it. That is what the EU changes will bring and they will denigrate the overall experience.
 
Why would anyone use another browser like Safari?
When I use an Android device, I always dream of going back to safari.
Cookie Autodelete! Any cook from a site NOT on the whitelist goes away when you close the browser. Take a look and see how many useless cookies are cluttering up your system.

Also Privacy Badger was good, but Safari has anti-tracking now too.
 
The distinction for the EU is probably that they mandated phones, and that does not include tablets.
No, it includes any operating systems or devices. The deciding factor is how many EU citizens are affected. So it may depend on whether you see iOS and iPadOS as basically the same or as two different operating systems.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.