Choose your default browser skin you say?and as has been pointed out before, iOS users have been able to choose their default browser since iOS 14.
Choose your default browser skin you say?and as has been pointed out before, iOS users have been able to choose their default browser since iOS 14.
So you think it’s a sane decision to disallow the feature on an iPad when it’s been allowed on an iPhone?So go to Android or Windows or Linux.
Offers less. Issue with Webkit is it is behind the times and not being kept up with modern standards.
So go to Android or Windows or Linux.
Such a tired retort to frustrations with Apple
Yeah. That’s Apple’s playbook. The only way to get Apple to change is to change the rules they operate under.So you think it’s a sane decision to disallow the feature on an iPad when it’s been allowed on an iPhone?
Because a non-WebKit browser app could choose to make any iOS function that is available to apps also available to web applications, which in turn would allow to implement web applications with basically the same functionality and platform integration as native applications. This, in turn, would deprive Apple of revenue from their App Store.
Funny thing is Steve Jobs originally never wanted an app store when the iPhone first came out. He wanted everyone to make web-apps instead so he could keep iOS even more locked down. Now the App Store keeps making them so much money that it seems almost insane that he wanted to pass that upAnother explanation - perhaps less cynical - is that Apple is trying to have control over all code that runs on the device in order to provide better security. If browsers are forced to use he Apple engine, all Javascript being loaded by the browser gets run under Apple's control. If browsers use their own engines, Apple loses that control/oversight. You may argue whether Apple actually does any security checking on the Javascript it runs, but you can't argue how controlling code execution can have security benefits. This is also the reason Apple didn't allow the Java VM onto the iOS platform.
Choose your default browser skin you say?
There is nothing like this in the play store.You can install it in Firefox for Android.
As long as Android and its derivative exist, this talk point will never die. I feel very sorry that Microsoft took way too long to react how important mobile market is. Had windows phone properly took off, Apple might not believe they can just BAU however they like.Windows - for a phone? In 2024?
Also, as above..
Oh, no! There are unforeseen hardships! Who could have known when EU regulators, who have never had to design, build nor support ANY technology, would have created a set of regulations that would end up with things being worse? Of course, the answer is literally anyone who was paying attention to GDPR![]()
While support for alternative browser engines sounds like a win for browser companies, Mozilla spokesperson Damiano DeMonte told The Verge that Firefox is "extremely disappointed" with the way Apple is implementing the feature because it does not extend to the iPad.Firefox uses the Gecko engine and could swap to that on the iPhone, but it would need to continue using WebKit on the iPad. According to DeMonte, Apple's implementation of the DMA does not give consumers "viable choices" because it makes it "as painful as possible" for companies to provide alternatives to Safari.
As long as Android and its derivative exist, this talk point will never die. I feel very sorry that Microsoft took way too long to react how important mobile market is. Had windows phone properly took off, Apple might not believe they can just BAU however they like.
Whilst you have a point - if you can’t see that this is apples doing then I’m afraid you’re being somewhat shortsighted.Oh, no! There are unforeseen hardships! Who could have known when EU regulators, who have never had to design, build nor support ANY technology, would have created a set of regulations that would end up with things being worse? Of course, the answer is literally anyone who was paying attention to GDPREven John Gruber at daringfireball.net
The European Commission expected that the GDPR would result in websites prioritizing the privacy of E.U. users — a better web in Europe than elsewhere. Instead, the result was increased user annoyance under a nonstop daily barrage of consent popovers — a worse web in Europe than elsewhere. I suspect the same will prove true of the DMA and mobile platforms.
I would disagree with that - the iPad is going just fine, despite the lack of any competition - and that not really being because Apple did something amazing, but because everyone else seemed to forgor about tablets in the mid-10s until it was too late to counter Apple effectively.This is another reason why people having mixed feelings about iPads presently because its seems like iPadOS is gong no where as fast as iOS. Like when Classical came out it was iOS and using it on a iPad didn't allow for the larger display to be used effectively with its more involved interface of artwork. Instead you just enlarged a IOS app to grow in size.
So here is this alternative browser support example again being centered around the iOS so making iPadOS users 2nd class citizens once more. Give us some love Apple?
And how effective and powerful Apple PR has been on various issues involving them. It’s just terrifying to even think about it. Thankfully some judges and regulators don’t buy all of their PR stunt and EU took the lead.It's amazing how many people don't understand what they have/haven't been using
(Safari skins, not actual other browsers)
It explains so much of the rest of the uninformed commentary around all things Apple
Free plug for the iOS app “Hush Nag Blocker”, which blocks said GDPR cookie pop-ups on EVERY website.Oh, no! There are unforeseen hardships! Who could have known when EU regulators, who have never had to design, build nor support ANY technology, would have created a set of regulations that would end up with things being worse? Of course, the answer is literally anyone who was paying attention to GDPREven John Gruber at daringfireball.net
The European Commission expected that the GDPR would result in websites prioritizing the privacy of E.U. users — a better web in Europe than elsewhere. Instead, the result was increased user annoyance under a nonstop daily barrage of consent popovers — a worse web in Europe than elsewhere. I suspect the same will prove true of the DMA and mobile platforms.
Sadly it died, and I never got the chance to properly experience it.Windows Phone was brilliant with how they handled notifications with “tiles” on the main screen.
Certainly lets you block some company putting whatever they feel like on your computer though - so there’s that.It’s ridiculous we need an extension to block a legally required notice because it ruins the user experience.
You install it from Firefox’ Add-on menu.There is nothing like this in the play store.
Apple also has a promoted privacy and security and these laws undermine that. If you disagree buy an android phone. I trust Apple over these other companies any day of the week.
Which makes one wonder, of ALL the countries to enact something so draconian (we’re going to fine you not based on what you make IN the region, but based on what you make WORLDWIDE), why was it the EU? What makes the EU more power hungry in this area than China which has a similar iPhone market percentage (20-30%) but, even knowing all of the things they’re known for, they still didn’t go as far as the EU?It would be interesting if Chinese government follows suite and demand the same. Apple would have no choice but to comply, and they cannot even use the same talking point much publicly in China, otherwise they’d lose 20% of their revenue stream immediately.
Maybe but Apple was upfront about what it is about. There were no surprises. Some people like myself bought an iPhone for those very reasons. I don’t want the Wild West of Android with all the malware, virus and security problems that come with it. That is what the EU changes will bring and they will denigrate the overall experience.Such a tired retort to frustrations with Apple
Cookie Autodelete! Any cook from a site NOT on the whitelist goes away when you close the browser. Take a look and see how many useless cookies are cluttering up your system.Why would anyone use another browser like Safari?
When I use an Android device, I always dream of going back to safari.
No, it includes any operating systems or devices. The deciding factor is how many EU citizens are affected. So it may depend on whether you see iOS and iPadOS as basically the same or as two different operating systems.The distinction for the EU is probably that they mandated phones, and that does not include tablets.