Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The higher those prices are the more people will be going back to their pirate ships ?

As someone who comes from the era where you had to pay about $3 in rental fees per video tape and return it after 3 days, $20/month (about 7 tapes/movies) is still really good deal. I also remember cable tv costing like $100/m ($171 fixed for inflation!) . So yeah, $20 is not bad.

The problem, back when you paid $3 per tape you could watch any movie you want with $20/month you are limited to the Netflix library.
Exactly. And let’s not forget you can “rotate” services — for example, there isn’t enough on Apple TV+ to justify us subscribing all year, so we just hop on for a month or two, then remove it and get something else and catch up on that one.

The key here being that you don’t need to subscribe to 5 services simultaneously. We usually keep Netflix all year, then one other depending on the content.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JahBoolean
Might have to cut Apple TV to make up for it. If not for the forth coming Ted Lasso 3rd season, I would have done it now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: r3m1
They are beginning to price themselves out of the market now..
Will have to see how this affects the U.K. prices, we only had an increase about 4 months ago!

Disney Plus won't put another raise through for a while and Amazon haven't had a raise in ages, yet they offer great content.
Every time Netflix raises prices this is the usual comment, then their subscriber numbers grow because they continuously acquire a wide variety of content to be developed or licensed for streaming by them. They also seem to be the largest international streaming provider of foreign language content. Remember back in Jan 2021 they Leased two production facilities in Korea? Squid game was theirs. They now seem to be getting a lot various asian productions on a regular basis, some dubbed, most subtitled. From Japan, Taiwan sources also. A lot of counties they stream to subscribers, demand local production content be included. Does HBO, Disney do that? Amazon? Even if a lot of their content appears so so they are marketing to the world which is pretty unique.
 
We’re in the midst of the pandemic, businesses are going under and people are uncertain about their financial futures. Way to read the room, Netflix.

And for what? Netflix has had its bones picked by every studio launching their own streaming service and we are left with Netflix Originals and crappy shows and movies from the throw out bin at Blockbuster.
I think you're forgetting that Netflix is also a business who, like others, is probably also facing rising costs due to the pandemic? Nonetheless, with the trash content on Netflix over the last few years I agree that they shouldn't be charging customers for sub-par content.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AuntieL
LOL, like THAT ever happens! ?

Yep. I know a recording artist who taught music as a side-gig. He would make his students and their parents sign an agreement: No Television on Weeknights/School Nights.

That was before smartphones, so I'll bet today he has added to that requirement, but his point was that people would complain that they don't have time to practice their instrument, and kids would be really good at saying they don't have time to practice.

He would call BS on that and say that EVERYBODY has 15-30 minutes or more to practice their instrument weeknights, at least. Unless you're spending 3 hours watching television. Or, I would add, messing around with social media, playing online games, and more.

"Than". And yes, if you have a lot of individual services, that may be true. That's why I limit myself to Prime (free) and purchased media for my own use. Adding more and more services just provides more temptation for me to sit and vegetate.

That's how I left DirecTV.

Yep, that's great advice, "go enjoy something else for a few months". All this content will be here for you when you come back, even if it's 5 years later. Or 10.
LOL, like THAT ever happens! ?

Yep. I know a recording artist who taught music as a side-gig. He would make his students and their parents sign an agreement: No Television on Weeknights/School Nights.

That was before smartphones, so I'll bet today he has added to that requirement, but his point was that people would complain that they don't have time to practice their instrument, and kids would be really good at saying they don't have time to practice.

He would call BS on that and say that EVERYBODY has 15-30 minutes or more to practice their instrument weeknights, at least. Unless you're spending 3 hours watching television. Or, I would add, messing around with social media, playing online games, and more.

"Than". And yes, if you have a lot of individual services, that may be true. That's why I limit myself to Prime (free) and purchased media for my own use. Adding more and more services just provides more temptation for me to sit and vegetate.

That's how I left DirecTV.

Yep, that's great advice, "go enjoy something else for a few months". All this content will be here for you when you come back, even if it's 5 years later. Or 10.
I might not understand the morale of the story properly. It looked like finding 30 min a day for something important is always possible. But do you say that Netflix is a good thing and is worth find time for?
 
Every time Netflix raises prices this is the usual comment, then their subscriber numbers grow because they continuously acquire a wide variety of content to be developed or licensed for streaming by them. They also seem to be the largest international streaming provider of foreign language content. Remember back in Jan 2021 they Leased two production facilities in Korea? Squid game was theirs. They now seem to be getting a lot various asian productions on a regular basis, some dubbed, most subtitled. From Japan, Taiwan sources also. A lot of counties they stream to subscribers, demand local production content be included. Does HBO, Disney do that? Amazon? Even if a lot of their content appears so so they are marketing to the world which is pretty unique.

Amazon has sports and is growing in that, Netflix has decided to do games. Their is a massive hole in the market for streaming sports especially live. Game streaming already has huge players in it.
So whilst they may add content I fail to see the reason for a price increase way above others. Let's not forget Netflix do release their films into cinemas too.
And let's not forget, Netflix still geolock some of it's content, the US will get more content then the U.K. dose for instance that isn't made by Netflix.
 
Remember when streaming meant you could save money instead of an expensive DirecTV contract? Seems like a long time ago...
Things have changed. Netflix is churning out plenty of original content that costs billions to produce and that content currently justifies the current prices. I'm fine with it for now but there has the be a balance.

I subscribed the Disney+ specifically to watch the Beatles documentary. Most of the content on Disney+ is fluffy family friendly rubbish and all that Marvel nonsense, but Disney+ will go the same way with their pricing eventually. Unfortunately for them, they just have their back catalogue to rely on (which is mostly awful) and not a lot of original shows & content. I'm sure Disney being Disney will soon start jacking up the monthly pricing quite substantially. It's just how steaming business models work - attract customers with low pricing then jack the prices up & hope no one notices too much.
 
I don't have Netflix but looking at these tiers, they should not charge for resolution. Delivering 4K versus 1080P is an effectively zero cost to Netflix. Billions of hours served per day, this means Netflix really costs $240 a year and the other tiers are there for people to feel like they have a choice. No one else charges for resolution except Netflix.
 
Geeze, this is ridiculous.

The least Netflix can do is offer 4K across all tiers, differentiated only by # of simultaneous streams.

They're holding 4K hostage on the premium price, because they know that people will pay it to get 4K. If they put it on the middle price many would switch to that.
 
As a family of 5, I am basically (still) finding nothing on Netflix to watch. I don't think the wife and/or I have watched a movie on Netflix in over a year. Maybe the kids find a tv series every blue moon or a kid movie, but rare. I agree that the movie selection on Netflix is quite poor. There is absolutely nothing good for movies created from 1960-present. Nothing. I think it's time for me to dump Netflix at $15.50/month and just concentrate on Disney and Apple and HBO Max. There are plenty of great movies I can buy on Apple for $6-$12 that I can then watch a billion times.

Disclaimer: we're also not tv junkies, so your mileage may vary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AuntieL
So whilst they may add content I fail to see the reason for a price increase way above others. Let's not forget Netflix do release their films into cinemas too.
Content production costs billions. They are actually making their own content rather than limited time licensing like they were doing previously. The main problem is that all the content owners have gone the route of creating their own sites, like Disney, ViacomCBS, NBCUniversal and are cutting a lot of deals to get back most of their content. Most of HBO is WB based, so heavily on movies, some deals with TMC/Criterion, some TV content. Most of their content is only HD. I know they have a 20% off discount right now, but normally they are ad supported $9.99 HD normally and $14.99 4K no ads normally. So I guess most feel that all the streamers should charge the same, but it really comes down to is there something on a particular streaming web site you need to watch, if so sign up for a month if the service is not your cup of tea. ;)

Disney will be more of a contender when it can dissolve the Comcast ownership of Hulu here in the states and create that matured content section on Disney +. Hulu is indeed doomed some time in the next 2 years, because it only runs in USA and Japan, not internationally. (in UK its the Star content)
 
Got off their wild ride last year. Constantly escalating prices, frequent removal of content I'm trying to enjoy... no more... back to owning stuff, or yarring it where necessary.

A trans friend suggested people leave it to help their cause and I didn't take much convincing!
 
Content production costs billions. They are actually making their own content rather than limited time licensing like they were doing previously. The main problem is that all the content owners have gone the route of creating their own sites, like Disney, ViacomCBS, NBCUniversal and are cutting a lot of deals to get back most of their content. Most of HBO is WB based, so heavily on movies, some deals with TMC/Criterion, some TV content. Most of their content is only HD. I know they have a 20% off discount right now, but normally they are ad supported $9.99 HD normally and $14.99 4K no ads normally. So I guess most feel that all the streamers should charge the same, but it really comes down to is there something on a particular streaming web site you need to watch, if so sign up for a month if the service is not your cup of tea. ;)

Disney will be more of a contender when it can dissolve the Comcast ownership of Hulu here in the states and create that matured content section on Disney +. Hulu is indeed doomed some time in the next 2 years, because it only runs in USA and Japan, not internationally. (in UK its the Star content)

That's the issue though, most of Netflix's own content is drivel, I'm not alone in thinking that. Some of it is good but not all. And not have any Disney content makes for poor value.
They IMO can't justify this increase again in price so quickly after the last one.
It's all relative to the content you want to watch I guess. I enjoy some things on Netflix but Disney Plus and Amazon Prime for me are better value because of what I watch. For now I'll keep all three but if they begin to become too expensive then I'll have to reconsider my options.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Realityck
I didn’t even know my basic plan subscription is not HD ?
Once upon a time it was.... but if you never changed plans I believe you never lost the HD stream unless you canceled and came back.
Geeze, this is ridiculous.

The least Netflix can do is offer 4K across all tiers, differentiated only by # of simultaneous streams.
So many streamers still don't even off 4K at all (Looking at you Hulu) or very limited. HBO Max is awful with that... and things dont stay in 4K. When Tennant was in theaters and on HBO max it was 4K, now it's just in HD.

The majority of people don't own 4K TV's, so I see the logic in branching it out (even though I'm stuck paying more). Since the orange man's administration killed net neutrality, companies have to pay a lot more money to operators for 4K streams so Netflix's cost for delivering 4K is higher. This is why YouTube TV charges an add on for 4K content because their cost to deliver to the end user is higher. Close to double.
 
I have Netflix that's "free" with my T-Mobile plan, but now the portion I have to pay is going to $10-11/month I'd guess. It started out as $0...and has crept up since. That's not free, so it's likely toast. Basically watch Youtube and Discovery+ at this point. Good by me, too many distractions anyhow to sit around and watch Netflix.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No thanks. I stopped subbing Netflix already. Too much mediocre and dumb assembly-line content. The last show they butchered was The Witcher. They had a sure hit on their hands here, but they had to go and mess it up YET AGAIN with subpar writing. Seriously, Netflix and Disney deserves each other. They represent the same issues in today's entertainment - ie. putting woke messaging and political correct nonsense over quality scripts, dialogue, plot and intelligence.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.