Or your cell phone provider is subsidizing it for you.Disney just announced they lost $1.1 billion on its streaming business in a single quarter.
The free ride is over (unless you sail the high seas)
Or your cell phone provider is subsidizing it for you.Disney just announced they lost $1.1 billion on its streaming business in a single quarter.
The free ride is over (unless you sail the high seas)
Definitely. We got memberships cards in the mail lately, but otherwise, I'm pretty much taking stuff from the mailbox to the garbageThat's exactly what happens. And generally nothing is sent there, because so much is digital.
In terms of how I personally think services should work, I'm actually in full agreement that it shouldn't matter where the streaming is from, only the number of streams--if I'm paying for 2 simultaneous streams, it should not matter what IP address they're going to.But if they have fewer eyeballs will it be more difficult to get good content? I guess what I don’t get is why does it matter whether the content is streaming from the same ip address or not? A stream is a stream right?
But if 4 people stream from the same ip address it won’t cost anything extra? Where is the logic in that?
Like I said earlier, I have an Apple One subscription. My mom and sister are family members on it. Neither one lives with me. Apple doesn’t care.
So what? What does it matter whether the streams are coming from a single address or not? Because Netflix now thinks if my mom and sister weren’t using my login they’d pay for the service themselves? Haha, not quite. They just won’t watch.
Likewise, a friend's son is deployed in the Marines, but still stateside. However, his residence is still my friend's, as they've got no permanent address. Should they (the son) be denied access or charged extra, for serving in the military? I mean, I guess if Netflix really wants to go down that extreme road, fine. But they'll lose subscribers.Definitely. We got memberships cards in the mail lately, but otherwise, I'm pretty much taking stuff from the mailbox to the garbage
This, and also credit card companies.Or your cell phone provider is subsidizing it for you.
That really isn't fraud. Their mailing address is the same household. My daughter's income tax stuff got mailed to my home. It didn't get mailed to her dorm. Not sure why this is so difficult to understand.
Neat, I never knew CC gave you that. We have D+ Bundle through VZW, so maybe I should peruse some CC perksThis, and also credit card companies.
I would not subscribe to Netflix or AppleTV, personally, but get both for free from T-Mobile, and while I did have a Hulu subscription I didn't get Disney+ until American Express subsidized it for the same cost I was paying.
JFC dude. Okay. If you can't understand the concept of someone going to college or being deployed in the military, but still has their residence/household listed as the same as the account holder's for everything (not just Netflix), I don't know what to tell you.If they are LIVING in your house that's fine. If they are NOT LIVING in your house, you're violating Netflix's terms and conditions.
Not sure why this is so difficult to understand.
This will backfire on them. And even though they’re not ad based you would think they (or the people selling them content) would care about eyeballs because they want people watching (and talking about) their content.In terms of how I personally think services should work, I'm actually in full agreement that it shouldn't matter where the streaming is from, only the number of streams--if I'm paying for 2 simultaneous streams, it should not matter what IP address they're going to.
If Netflix doesn't think they can make a profit allowing 4 streams for the price, then they should reduce the number of streams, not try to shame users because of who, specifically, those streams are being watched by. Apple, for example, is quite vague about what constitutes a "family" for their sharing plans, mainly restricting the total number of people and how often people join and leave.
However, as far as eyeballs go, Netflix currently isn't at all advertising-based, so why would the number of viewers have anything to do with their ability to get good content? It is 100% down to how much money they spend on content, not how many people actually watch it. Indeed, leaving aside that they need to keep customers happy and watching, the less people watch the more profit Netflix makes and/or the more they have to spend on content, since it reduces bandwidth and IT costs.
Phrased differently, the number of people who watch a show on broadcast TV or on any ad-supported streaming service is directly proportionate to the amount of money that show earns. But once Netflix has spent the money on a show, that's it--the only value it has is the abstract ability to keep customers from cancelling their subscription, or to entice new customers to subscribe who otherwise would not have.
I learned today that that actually has a great impact on how they report their financials, as they amortize the cost of content in interesting ways.
Though this indeed isn't their ToS, I completely agree with you.In terms of how I personally think services should work, I'm actually in full agreement that it shouldn't matter where the streaming is from, only the number of streams--if I'm paying for 2 simultaneous streams, it should not matter what IP address they're going to.
So Netflix’s business plan is to have fewer people watch their content. And then watch as good content goes elsewhere.That's the idea.
Arguing T&C is kinda ridiculous considering Netflix wasn’t/isn’t enforcing them.If they are LIVING in your house that's fine. If they are NOT LIVING in your house, you're violating Netflix's terms and conditions.
LIVING vs. NOT LIVING in your house.
Not sure why this is so difficult to understand.
And then more will cancel, and they will thing raising the price and poorly cutting costs will help, but actually more will cancel until NF goes the way of BB and the DodoSo Netflix’s business plan is to have fewer people watch their content. And then watch as good content goes elsewhere.
JFC dude. Okay. If you can't understand the concept of someone going to college or being deployed in the military, but still has their residence/household listed as the same as the account holder's for everything (not just Netflix), I don't know what to tell you.
But they do live there. So yeah, pretty simple!It really boils down to understanding the concept of Living or Not Living in a single household.
Pretty simple.
Arguing T&C is kinda ridiculous considering Netflix wasn’t/isn’t enforcing them.
My bill has not changed in 7 years, ao if they are, cool!Or your cell phone provider is subsidizing it for you.
but the college student 3000 miles away is totally going to move back with mom and dad forever!If they are LIVING in your house that's fine. If they are NOT LIVING in your house, you're violating Netflix's terms and conditions.
LIVING vs. NOT LIVING in your house.
Not sure why this is so difficult to understand.
But they do live there. So yeah, pretty simple!