Isn't that the point? There's waaay more than 2.8 streaming platforms, and to start making the kind of money they need to, the likes of Netflix and Disney need to keep growing their subscriber numbers month by month, which means retaining existing ones, not having them rotate between the other services. One way that I was managing to keep across several services was password sharing, i.e. my mum paid for Netflix, I paid for Disney, and we all had log ins. If they start cracking down on that *and* people still stick to the 2.8 average, something is going to break eventually. How long can i.e. Lionsgate+ keep operating as a separate service? What's the end goal for them?You're making the assumption that people subscribe to all those services at the same time. But they don't. People subscribe to an average of 2.8 services at a time.
I guess we will see that happen, but that’s the whole reason they exist in the first place!What's the betting that we will now see Netflix profits soar and then read that they have given huge bonuses to directors and large dividends to share holders. In my opinion only a very small amount will be invested back into the company.
No, they exist to provide a service that people would want. Making a reasonable profit is part of the overall goal but the password word thing is nothing more than a money grab to increase profit and nothing to do with improving services, that was their goal in my opinion. Netflix excuse in doing the password thing has always been about getting money to improve their service, to provide better content. You watch, I bet you that will not happen or if it does it will be very very minimal because they want the new found money to go to directors and shareholders.I guess we will see that happen, but that’s the whole reason they exist in the first place!
I could post other similar things but as they fall in the realm of politics would not fly here...View attachment 2234752
They seem to forget this...
A streaming service can match the speed and content of a cable TV service. It all depends on the content they wish to purchase. It's like saying CD's will never go out of business. There will always be a newer way to distribute content. CD's may literally never go out of business, but they will be a small player compared to music streaming services or even purchasing digital music.I honestly don't think Cable TV will ever go out of business. There's something about watching live TV which you don't get from Netflix, Hulu or Disney +, and so on.
The whole reason a business exists is to make money; businesses that don’t make money go out of business.No, they exist to provide a service that people would want. Making a reasonable profit is part of the overall goal but the password word thing is nothing more than a money grab to increase profit and nothing to do with improving services, that was their goal in my opinion. Netflix excuse in doing the password thing has always been about getting money to improve their service, to provide better content. You watch, I bet you that will not happen or if it does it will be very very minimal because they want the new found money to go to directors and shareholders.
They are growing at about 107% in subscriber numbers...they're doing something right...Well that's one way to increase your subs.
Yes we need a centrally planned and controlled economy.And immediately they increased the prices. Cause the free market self regulates and all that.. It only self regulates in the sense of taking as much as possible from the people. It's not really connected to costs anymore for most businesses and that's partly why we're seeing these crazy profits at the same time when people are struggling with paying for food and rent/mortgages. The free market needs a lot more rules to protect people.
That is just it, companies take the public for fools when they increase costs is the result of a free market. It may have meant that a number of years ago but BS to that now. A free market means how much greedy profit a company can make at the expense of a poor service. Free market no longer gives the public good services, all it does it make bosses and shareholders richer whilst the consumer suffers. Look at all the companies that made profits during the pandemic and now the energy crisis. Have any of these companies upped their game in provide us the public/consumer a better service? hell no. All they do is raise prices, announce huge profits and then give the their directors huge bonuses whilst government watchdogs/overseers just sit back and let the companies get away with it.And immediately they increased the prices. Cause the free market self regulates and all that.. It only self regulates in the sense of taking as much as possible from the people. It's not really connected to costs anymore for most businesses and that's partly why we're seeing these crazy profits at the same time when people are struggling with paying for food and rent/mortgages. The free market needs a lot more rules to protect people.
Netflix IS audited. It's a publicly traded company. Both the SEC and E&Y audit Netflix activities and report this information back to the shareholders.Something is not right.
How do we know these are real subscribers? Could be the bot accounts. Someone needs to audit Netflix.
If enough consumers don’t think Netflix offers good value and end their subscription then Netflix will sit up and take notice. Until that happens, your own individual gripes about the service are (frankly) not important. I don’t mean that horribly, I just mean you do not have any power as an individual to change anything; you would need many many more consumers to feel the same way you do to have an effect.That is just it, companies take the public for fools when they increase costs is the result of a free market. It may have meant that a number of years ago but BS to that now. A free market means how much greedy profit a company can make at the expense of a poor service. Free market no longer gives the public good services, all it does it make bosses and shareholders richer whilst the consumer suffers. Look at all the companies that made profits during the pandemic and now the energy crisis. Have any of these companies upped their game in provide us the public/consumer a better service? hell no. All they do is raise prices, announce huge profits and then give the their directors huge bonuses whilst government watchdogs/overseers just sit back and let the companies get away with it.
Will Netflix provide a much much better service with all this new found wealth from the changes they made to the password policy? hell no. They will make excuses that money had to be spent elsewhere. They will probably announce staff reductions because lets face it, how many other companies have been downsizing on employee's lately? quite a few.
You are one of the few posters that actually gets this is a business.If enough consumers don’t think Netflix offers good value and end their subscription then Netflix will sit up and take notice. Until that happens, your own individual gripes about the service are (frankly) not important. I don’t mean that horribly, I just mean you do not have any power as an individual to change anything; you would need many many more consumers to feel the same way you do to have an effect.
This is why Apple does not make changes based on the moans and gripes of a few people on this forum and instead listen to what the majority of people want.
No it is not. There are two reasons why a business exist, reason 1 is wanting to help people which has the result of making the business money but making money was not the primary factor and reason 2, purely to make money, nothing more, nothing less.The whole reason a business exists is to make money; businesses that don’t make money go out of business.
That's total croc.No it is not. There are two reasons why a business exist, reason 1 is wanting to help people which has the result of making the business money but making money was not the primary factor and reason 2, purely to make money, nothing more, nothing less.
So it provides enough value to subscribe right now and share, but the second they say non paying people can’t use it, it loses its value? Make it make senseSame here. My brother lives about 10 minutes away and we can still share one account. If they crack down on us, we'll cancel. No big deal.
Well, if you think it is BS then I hope you go to every single business in the world and call the owners 'liar' to their face when they say they did what they did to help others and was not all about money because believe me there are business owners out there who have their business because they want to help others or are doing what they are doing because they turned their love for something or a hobby into a business and not just purely to make money. Yes there are many businesses out there who sole purpose for existence is to make money but not every business is like that and if you still think it is BS then please make video posts on social media of you asking business owners why they created their business and if they say anything other than making money then I want to see you call them a downright liar because that is what you are accusing all businesses of doing. If you don't then I know your post if just full of BS.That's total croc.
Do you really think Apple gives a flying hoot about you? They make good products to make heaps of money. The more they massage their customers' ego, the more $$$ we are willing to part with, in their direction. People are greedy. They want lots of dollar bills and if it means making good products, then great.
But let's not fool ourselves. The end goal is $$$.
Even good charities see the same. Their end goal is $$$, but the difference is the money gets distributed differently.
No business exists simply to make people happy with $$$ as a secondary target. Those that do exist this way are destined to fail.
ETA, one more thing to add. Those that appear to want to make people happy and have money as a secondary objective are just very clever, and they keep their earnings discreet. A great example of this was FTX. Sam Bankman was seen as a "hippie" geeky guy who just wanted to help to make the world a better place. He would boast of his Prius and was very discreet about his money.
The reality was he was hoarding millions. How much, we will never know, but his goal was $$$. We were just all duped by his "Robin Hood" story. Many fell for it, and even more were stung when it eventually collapsed.
Morons. IP is not reliable solution.Netflix restricting access based on IP.
I'm sorry, but that is total delusion on your part.Well, if you think it is BS then I hope you go to every single business in the world and call the owners 'liar' to their face when they say they did what they did to help others and was not all about money because believe me there are business owners out there who have their business because they want to help others or are doing what they are doing because they turned their love for something or a hobby into a business and not just purely to make money. Yes there are many businesses out there who sole purpose for existence is to make money but not every business is like that and if you still think it is BS then please make video posts on social media of you asking business owners why they created their business and if they say anything other than making money then I want to see you call them a downright liar because that is what you are accusing all businesses of doing. If you don't then I know your post if just full of BS.
And what might those "easy ways" be?There are easy ways to get around the password sharing ban, so I doubt this is the sole reason.
I haven't tried, but according to Netflix, VPN doesn't work because your account is tied to your physical address.Customer to Netflix: In an acronym, “VPN”.