Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Sharing accounts its obviously a contributor, but by far not the biggest factor.

I would say rapidly rising prices and more competing streaming services, each with their own blockbuster shows that draw attention and $$$, are the main causes. When they do land huge shows, they sometimes botch it: has anyone actually tried to watch Seinfeld on Netflix? The picture quality is absolutely atrocious.

Also people have been stuck at home for 2 years... they've already binged all the shows that are worth watching on Netflix, and it seems that the output of new shows and movies that people actually want to watch has slowed down dramatically.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WiseAJ
No. I unsubbed a year ago as not enough content to justify the ever creeping price. And I pay the max for full fat 4K.
 
What's missing from this version of the story: revenue improved vs. same quarter 1 year ago but fell short of expectations.

Keep in mind too that they suspended operations in Russia which resulted in a loss of 700K paid net additions. Had there been no war-driven action there, they would have added about 500K subscribers in this quarter.

Much like Apple releasing better revenue numbers than expected but then the stock taking a hit, it's expectations that is mostly driving this. The bad news on that front is Netflix expecting to lose about 2M more subscribers this quarter. However, for the next quarter, they are expecting to again (revenue) beat the same quarter from a year ago even with fewer subscribers. How do you do that? One way is the added revenue from price hikes makes a modestly smaller number of subscribers yield more revenue.

So while we will beat them down in this thread, the net result is they are actually making MORE money from modestly fewer subscribers AND taking the stance of actually cutting off certain revenue from Russia. They similarly expect to make MORE money next quarter than year ago too but their projection is not as high as Wall Street would like (sound familiar?) so the stock is taking a pounding today.

Basically "Netflix is doomed! Netflix is doomed!" with about $8 Billion/quarter, 222 MILLION subscribers and their belief that 100 MILLION households are "sharing" access from someone else without paying for it. If that number is real and they cut off up to 100 MILLION people and/or do what they are doing with an extra fee to share with another household in some test countries, what is likely to happen to paying subscriber counts? They add a bunch of new revenue from the people who are not paying for it now... certainly not 100M but it won't take many having to actually pay for the service to completely cover this modest loss of subscribers PLUS the expected 2M. This whole thing is about a fraction of 1% of the whole business.

No particular sympathy for Netflix or anything- just adding some information that might paint a different picture than the simplistic: price hike = devastation... quality of content = devastation.
I dont think they understand how many people justify the cost by sharing. Honestly piracy is now easier again and good luck combatting that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SigEp265
Two days ago I logged into Netflix on a Roku TV that was in my vacation rental. Will I still be able to do that when I'm not allowed to "share" with myself in a different location? I'll probably hold onto Netflix until the end of May to watch Stranger Things, but it'll most likely get the axe after that.
 
It's now back to piracy as streaming is becoming a fragmented and expensive mess of low quality content - just like cable and satellite.

I think Netflix has peaked and all the streaming services forgot that piracy is waiting in the wings to punish them for their greed and stupidity.

I dont think they understand how many people justify the cost by sharing. Honestly piracy is now easier again and good luck combatting that.

If piracy ever becomes THE solution for the masses, that will kill the whole machine. It will certainly stick it to the "greedy and stupid" by destroying the whole industry. Thereafter, all original content would have YouTube video-type budgets and quality and the pirate masses will need to be happy with what was produced up to the point of the masses rebellion of 202X.

Analogous example: we're not wanting to pay Apple's "greedy" margin for the next iDevices or Macs. So let's just all steal them. That will show 'em... put them right in their place. And somehow Apple will be able to keep making new models year after year for no income that we can all steal too.

The piracy option only "works" while the numbers of pirates are small. If that becomes the masses "I'll show 'em" option, that's the end of new professionally-produced movies & TV content and the best new video will be YouTube quality made mostly by volunteers working for nothing-to-near-nothing in all of the professional roles of production.
 
Last edited:
Or now hear me out, how about they stop cancelling the quality shows after only one season? I am looking at you "Archive 81" and I am not ok with this". Great shows gone too long. It is like why should we invest in any of their shows?
 
  • Love
Reactions: SigEp265


Netflix lost subscribers for the first time in more than a decade in Q1 2022, according to subscriber numbers the company said during today's earnings results. Netflix is down more than 200,000 subscribers, and the losses are set to continue.

netflix2.jpg

Netflix was expecting to add 2.5 million subscribers in the first quarter of 2022, but did not hit that target. The suspension of its business in Russia cost it 700,000 subscribers, and without that loss, Netflix would have added 500,000 paid global users, which is still well below its projections.

In the United States and Canada, Netflix lost 600,000 customers, due to recent pricing changes. Netflix said this subscriber loss was anticipated and in line with expectations.

In a letter to shareholders [PDF], Netflix said that revenue growth has "slowed considerably," with the company faulting "a large number of households sharing accounts" and "competition" as reasons for the drop off. Netflix estimates that its 222 million paying households are sharing with an additional 100 million households that are not being monetized.

Going forward, Netflix said that it plans to implement "more effective monetization of multi-household sharing," which suggests that Netflix will soon enact measures to prevent account sharing. Netflix in March began testing an extra payment for those who share their Netflix accounts with people outside their households.

In Netflix's current test markets of Chile, Costa Rica, and Peru, customers can pay an extra fee to share their accounts with two people outside of their household. When the test was launched, Netflix said that it was working to "understand the utility of these two features" before making changes in other countries.

Netflix has always included wording in its terms and services that prevents account usage across multiple households, but until now, the service has ignored password sharing. Netflix also recently enacted new price hikes, and a 4K streaming plan is priced at $20 per month.

It's worth noting that Netflix is the only streaming service that charges by streaming quality. In the U.S., Netflix charges $9.99 for the Basic no-HD plan that allows for streaming on a single device, $15.49 for a Standard HD plan that allows for two people to watch at the same time, and $19.99 for a Premium plan with Ultra HD streaming and support for four simultaneous viewers.

In the second quarter of 2022, Netflix is anticipating losing two million paid subscribers.

Article Link: Netflix Loses Subscribers for the First Time in 10 Years, Blames Account Sharing
Yeah, sure Netflix, like password sharing is new. Blame it on the competition and your pricing tiers, which provides higher quality options. Disney+, Prime Video, Hulu, HBO Max, Apple TV+, etc while neither of them have the amount of content that Netflix has, they're pushing higher quality content. Netflix just picks up every show, gives them a first season, cancels 70% of them and so on. I think people are getting tired of that.
Exactly that. Netflix need to stop giving contracts to people like Adam sander and instead make decent stuff. I know the need to cater to a wide audience but they can do that while not spending a load on utter garbage.

When the cancelled The OA after the second season I cancelled my subscription and haven’t had one since. I’ll rejoin when they stop cancelling
Yeah, sure Netflix, like password sharing is new. Blame it on the competition and your pricing tiers, which provides higher quality options. Disney+, Prime Video, Hulu, HBO Max, Apple TV+, etc while neither of them have the amount of content that Netflix has, they're pushing higher quality content. Netflix just picks up every show, gives them a first season, cancels 70% of them and so on. I think people are getting tired of that.
Exactly that. Netflix need to stop giving contracts to people like Adam sander and instead make decent stuff. I know the need to cater to a wide audience but they can do that while not spending a load on utter garbage.

When they cancelled The OA after the second season I cancelled my subscription and haven’t had an account since.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FindingAvalon
Two days ago I logged into Netflix on a Roku TV that was in my vacation rental. Will I still be able to do that when I'm not allowed to "share" with myself in a different location? I'll probably hold onto Netflix until the end of May to watch Stranger Things, but it'll most likely get the axe after that.

Depending on how they implement it, if "you" were watching Netflix from both your home and your vacation rental at the same time, you'd probably have to pay extra... unless perhaps you can show them a way for you to be in 2 places at the same time.

On the other hand, if you watch from home when you are there and from the vacation rental when you are there, then that's "you" watching in one place at any one time. That should be fine and no extra cost.

I suspect the "sniffer" is going to take note of situations where 1 subscriber must be in 2 or more places watching 2 different things at the same time. Even those with some kind of wormhole/transporter technology to support the first part probably don't actually want to watch 2 different things simultaneously very often.
 
Content is still better than anything on Apple TV+.

With that said, yes, indiscriminate price increases are more to blame.
I barely watch anything on Netflix anymore. A complete waste of my money and they keep making it more expensive while at the same time delivering less quality shows etc. TV+ on the other hand is a steal at only $5 a month.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alexhardaker
Didn’t they answer why they’re down in the first part about withdrawing from Russia?

There is also the fact Netflix is the oldest of all streaming services. Everyone has had it and likely split off into their most preferred.

Account sharing is just one area (that has always existed) that they’re seeing potential to increase subscriptions.
 
But you get all of them for probably less than 1 or 2 tickets to the theaters to see ONE. That's been the value proposition from the beginning. And generally quality beats quantity for the average buyer. That's the kind of thing that led to 500 channels (of crap) cable packages, etc.

I'm not defending the concept- I'm more of a quality over quantity guy myself- but what works for the masses is generally what Netflix is doing: provide a whole bunch of content for about a Starbucks coffee or two or perhaps the cost of a movie ticket or two to a single movie.
I pay $22 a month to AMC to see 3 movies a week in theaters. Better value than Netflix.
 
I pay for 4K because you know its 2022 and I have a 4K TV. I can't remember the last time I watched something on Netflix. I keep paying because my parents and my brother use it once and a while to watch a couple shows. Please block them so I can cancel service. I can tell you right now neither of them will sign up I am the technology person of the family. Funny enough I don't even think my parents know how to use it they ask me to put it on when I come over.

If they offered a cheaper 4K single stream for someone like me who lives alone I would likely keep paying just to have the option.

Things I won't do:
-Pay for four streams as a single person household.
-Pay for less than 4K 2022.

Netflix is hitting a fun point in their company's lifespan. Either modernize or die out. Stream quality and Family are not a hand in hand metric......

These companies are all a joke honestly.
Finally watching Discovery on Paramount and I love that I have to crank my soundbar to max to hear the dialogue then the commercials can be heard across the street. They have multiple times acknowledged the issue on social media and say they are working on a fix but you can always pay for ad-free until they decide to give the fix to the subscribers.

Charging more and more for less. These companies act like they are going bankrupt while their pockets are overflowing.

I hope this is going to go the way of Music in the long term. For the most part you can pay which ever company you want and you have access to almost all music. They finally figured out that was the way to go. Piracy went down significantly. Do you want some money or none? Nice to see people are voting with their wallets/piracy and they are finally getting slapped in the face.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.