Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That's about what the Pound is worth anyways.....


...and I like my plastic Australian Dollars!

+100000

I don't know why the hell the USA hasn't gone to anything like the polymers the Australian dollar has.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banknotes_of_the_Australian_dollar

First off, being plastic/polymer kills the idea of having the right like/kind of paper, which is the first deterrent for counterfeits. Second, the holographic/transparent images are very hard to duplicate. Third, the feel of the bill helps those who are blind to recognize which bill is which. Fourth, the colour makes it easy to know which is which for everyone else.

As far as western cultures go, the US is way behind the curve on this.

BL.
 
Umm...
ten.png


As far as I know, all bills down to the $5 (maybe even $1) have a watermark like the above.

Yep. The watermark is supposed to be the same as the portrait on the bill. So a $5 would have a Lincoln watermark, a $20 a Jackson watermark. The $1000 doesn't have a Grover Cleveland watermark (at least the bill I've got). I haven't gotten my mits on the $10,000 or the $100,000 bills yet.:( I've heard rumors of a $1,000,000 bill but I've only seen that in Leisure Suit Larry 2.;)
 
Yep. The watermark is supposed to be the same as the portrait on the bill. So a $5 would have a Lincoln watermark, a $20 a Jackson watermark.

I think I may have had some older notes that didn't have those security features :eek:. Maybe also the US banknotes aren't quite as obvious as other currencies.
 
Umm...
As far as I know, all bills down to the $5 (maybe even $1) have a watermark like the above.
Yep. The watermark is supposed to be the same as the portrait on the bill. So a $5 would have a Lincoln watermark, a $20 a Jackson watermark. The $1000 doesn't have a Grover Cleveland watermark (at least the bill I've got). I haven't gotten my mits on the $10,000 or the $100,000 bills yet.:( I've heard rumors of a $1,000,000 bill but I've only seen that in Leisure Suit Larry 2.;)
Read his whole post:
Eraserhead said:
The dollar does need to improve its security, the only way to check that the money is real is to check the paper feel between your fingers, it would be nice if there was at least a watermark as well, like the British have with the Queens head.

While we've been through quite a few currency redesigns over the last decade or so, but the $1 bill has received no attention since 1963.
 
While we've been through quite a few currency redesigns over the last decade or so, but the $1 bill has received no attention since 1963.

It was about the dollar to a reasonable extent as I had a lot of dollar notes when I went travelling, but it was about the larger notes too.
 
I think counterfeiting (oh hay, I spelled it right! :p) $1 bills would cost more per bill than they're worth. It would really only be something used for an attack on a currency, and that still wouldn't be very effective.

I can see it now: foreign agents taking wads of fake singles to strip clubs. :D
 
Not bad but I never understood the need to totally redesign money. Security features notwithstanding they should leave it as it is.
US money has been sorely in need of a redesign. It's easier to counterfeit and it's difficult for people with disabilities to use.
For example, if you're blind there's no difference in size or texture between the bills. How are you supposed to know what is a $100 and what's a $20? The different sizes would also help those who are color blind and/or have poor vision.
Although it wouldn't be useful for people with color blindness, different colored bills makes it so much easier for people who have poor vision.
There's other features, like using a material similar to Australia's money, that a real redesign could implement. Also, if the treasury did a real overhaul, then they wouldn't have to do this patchwork nonsense.
 
Do they need any beta testers?

...in using them, or faking them? ;)

I like the new $100 dollar bills, and others.

They kind of look like most European and Asian money from way, way back. The last step would be to have slightly different sizes to help the visually impaired.
 
Actually, if Photoshop detects currency, it won't even open the image. I tried to scan in a 20 out of boredom (and because I heard about that Photoshop "feature" and wanted to see if it was true) and it gave me a message about how counterfeiting money is bad and wouldn't open the file.

Photoshop didn't even let me open these "beta" samples. :p
 
They need to make it more accessible for people with vision impairments.

Ours are brightly coloured, have large numerals for the denominations and are of increasing size as the value goes up. Makes it much easier for blind and vision impaired people to use the currency.

What about blind drunk people?
 
For example, if you're blind there's no difference in size or texture between the bills. How are you supposed to know what is a $100 and what's a $20?

Sounds like an episode of ABC's "What would you do?" Have someone posing as a blind person buy something in a store and hand the clerk a series of bills asking them to take the correct amount for the purchase.

...that show is awful.
 
Fed Notes sure are getting colorful. I'm sure if Franklin knew his images was on these things, though, he'd be disgusted.

The US Constitution states:

• The Congress shall have power to...coin money, regulate the value thereof.

• No State shall...make any thing but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts.

Gotta go, I hear the PRSI forum calling.

Ben Franklin made quite a bit of money printing paper money.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.