Your appraisal of this post is not shared by people who know Engrish when they see it.Wait, wait, it's context!
To be fair, I singled him out solely because he just seemed so emotionally involved. His posts were very involved. And, the "aluminum is more expensive" side seemed to be tiring of him. I could single you out as well if only you would post some gibberish as well, but your post is intelligible.
Here's a fact, though: Oppenheimer (he works for Apple, in case you don't know) said aluminum is more expensive. At least, that was when it was adopted in 2008. Aiqw has been strangely silent about this. And when you think about it, if you're smart, you'll know that the only opinion that matters is Apple's - it wouldn't even matter if they were wrong in their cost analysis. That's why, to put an end to this, I directed people to Apple's quarterly conference calls. Facts without the logic of which facts are relevant are facts that nobody needs. This is why anyone speculating about transport costs, weight, etc - this is the reasoning of people who don't really know the what's what of business. There's a lot of factors. You need to be Apple to know. End of story.
Does it matter who won? Still, the answer is NO. If you agree and think Oppenheimer's sentiments are better than idle speculation, you may think I have won this argument. I did not. The quote is old. Anyway, the costs could change any time.
You're a joke. You just wanted to assume I was somehow "emotionally involved" in a argument on an online forum. You called yourself a loser by continuing to argue about plastics and aluminum. Case closed, your pathetic argument is over. I'm not checking this thread anymore, you're a waste of time.