Because the 4" iPhone currently available is outdated?
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
New A9-Based 4-Inch iPhone Expected to Launch Early 2016 With Apple Pay and Colorful Metal Casing
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Because the 4" iPhone currently available is outdated?
Lol too Samsungy? That's pretty funny you say that since Samsung makes plenty of much smaller phones, and the S6 is thinner and much much lighter than the 6S with a larger screen, etc. I think it would be more accurate to call it new-Appley
Metal chassis, CPU A9, Ram 2gb, 16 GB, nice screen and camera quality, 200$ cheaper than the 6s and this "Iphone 6c" could be my first iPhone.
Maybe by "colorful metal" they mean they are matching iPod colors?
Maybe by "colorful metal" they mean they are matching iPod colors?
I'm not, I'm talking about Apple making an iPhone that has reduced size while a nice large display.
Apple already sells over 200 million iPhones a year.
Is 20 million enough to start up a new product line?
iPhone was born and thrived as a small phone, based in part on the iPod form-factor, it's an iconic form factor that worked well for millions of users and there is nothing drastic that has changed that basic premise.
Sure bigger phones are more fashionable now, but they don't make smaller phones obsolete, I think it's primarily a matter of preference.
Sure bigger phones are more fashionable now, but they don't make smaller phones obsolete, I think it's primarily a matter of preference.
Because 5s lags/stutters with iOS9.
I don't agree they should have the exact same specs. For instance, the laws of physics dictate that smaller devices have less surface area for dissipating heat. I have no problem with there being 5-10% speed differences between different iPhone models based on clock speed alone. Or if they dropped a graphics core because of the lower screen resolution, that would be acceptable. If the OIS was only possible because of some size limitation, then I would be ok with that. Many people thought that was the reason last year as the 6 Plus was slightly thicker. This year the 6s is the same thickness of the old 6 Plus and it didn't get any OIS.
Although if thickness is the problem then I would simply prefer Apple stop making everything so damn thin. I understand that it helps drive innovation but we're reaching the limit of what is ergonomic. This 4" device sounds thicker with the 5s design. That means there's probably no reason they couldn't put 3D Touch into it. The energy efficiency of the A9 vs the A7 is pretty significant, so they could reduce the battery capacity to make room just like they did with the 6s. After all, the thickness helps makes up for the volume loss of a bigger device and quite honestly the fact that they're keeping it thick makes me wonder if there is more to this phone than we expect.
Apple probably would have made more money if they had kept the 4" size and priced it like this in 2014: $199 for the iPhone 6 Mini, $249 for the iPhone 6, and $299 for the iPhone 6 Plus. They would get a lot of people buying the mid-range size and make an extra $50 to boot. Then they could keep the smaller size at the same price point. The main thing I wonder about is if they couldn't get the 4" size to match the design of the others because they couldn't quite get it thin enough, but if that's right then that doesn't explain these reports of a 5s type design.
Thanks. I guess that is right...though the 5s is still a good phone, and the rumoured new 4-incher might be still be hamstrung in some way.
Grateful. Guess having Apple Pay in the rumoured phone would also be very useful for consumers and for Apple.
I still have 8.0.2 on my 5C and it runs fast! Some of the apps don't work but I don't care since I just get competing apps that will still work!
Apple is designing the product for "budget" conscious buyers and for buyers in the developing countries. I sure the U.S. veersion will have 16GB instead of the 8GB offering and 1GB RAM! The 4" is for people who cannot afford a 4.7" and for the U.S. carriers are offering it for "zero" down as a recruiting tool for new customers! It is not for the "normal Apple buyer"!
I think Apple missed out on the perfect smart phone screen size of 5". The 4.5" 6(s) and 5.5" 6 plus are both just outside that size, and don't work nearly as well as many other phones nearer to that 5" size.
I'm sure the new 4" size will sell a lot more than people think it will. That size is great for a number of folks. And the addition of the finger print feature on the button is a much needed boost for Apple Pay, which I still think is the best payment method out there. Not to mention just overall smart phone security in general. Hopefully they'll give it some camera love too.
As far as pricing, Apple does need to come down to compete better in the future. Most top end phones from competitors have been getting lower in price, and there is no reason the iPhone 6(s) were priced like they were. Any cheaper model should be much cheaper, starting below $300 full price/unlocked.
I'm sure the new 4" size will sell a lot more than people think it will. That size is great for a number of folks. And the addition of the finger print feature on the button is a much needed boost for Apple Pay, which I still think is the best payment method out there. Not to mention just overall smart phone security in general. Hopefully they'll give it some camera love too.
As far as pricing, Apple does need to come down to compete better in the future. Most top end phones from competitors have been getting lower in price, and there is no reason the iPhone 6(s) were priced like they were. Any cheaper model should be much cheaper, starting below $300 full price/unlocked.
Same. I sold my iPhone 6 three months after launch. For me it was too big, too slippy and impossible to use one handed. Pain to use. Went back to a 5s. The only thing I miss is the updated speed that the newer phones get with the latest chips.
Will be interested in this new 4" phone.
Exactly! But not only U.S, for everyone it needs to be A9, 16GB for base model and 2GB ram.
If not... it will be just an Ipod Touch with a SIM Card slot which has an A8 and 1GB of ram starting at 220$
If someone were to say, pat you on the back while you were using your phone, would it fall out of your hands? I cannot reach the top corner of my screen if the phone is placed PROPERLY in my hand, not balancing on my palm or fingertips, but actually gripped from both sides. This is why some of us would prefer 4" phones, they like to feel as if they are actually holding the phone, not juggling it.
If a lot of people still think that 4.5" is pushing it, I don't know that 5" would be that perfect.
It looks like Apple is finally apologizing for the "unapologetically plastic" iPhone 5c. Hopefully, this one will actually allow you to change your screen wallpaper to a color other than the phone color.
Metal chassis, CPU A9, Ram 2gb, 16 GB, nice screen and camera quality, 200$ cheaper than the 6s and this "Iphone 6c" could be my first iPhone.
Maybe by "colorful metal" they mean they are matching iPod colors?
It would be very easy for Apple to add the cellular module and the A9 is much smaller then the A8 SoC!
I would like to have the same technology and capacities as the 5.5" flagship as in the rumored 4" and leave the 4.7" as the budget model! Price the 4" and 5.5" the same!
It's insane. Look at the iPad lineup alone. They need to slim it down and focus on the simplicity of Good/Better/Best.
As of Dec 2015:
rMacbook, MacBook Air 11/13, Macbook Pro 13, rMacBook Pro 13/15
iMac 21.5, iMac 21.54k, iMac 27 5k
MacPro
MacMini
AppleTV
iPod Shuffle, iPod nano, iPod Touch,
iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, iPhone 6+, iPhone6s, iPhone 6s+
iPad mini 2, iPad mini 4, iPad Air, iPad Air 2, iPad Pro
Apple watch sport/watch/edition/ 38/42 (20 models available)
Last edited:
S6 Weight: 140 grams 6S Weight: 143 grams. "Much much lighter" eh? I think it would be more accurate to say you don't know what you're talking about.
And a heck of a lot of people buy the 5" Samsungs.... Not sure you got my point. And I did update my post before seeing yours that a 4" iPhone makes sense too. It's the iPhone 6 sizes that didn't quite meet what my opinion of a good phone size should be.